Total Depravity vs. Freewill

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

tribesman

Senior Member
Oct 13, 2011
4,621
281
83
John 14:17 isnt talking about salvation.


Of course it applies in all fields, especially when it comes to a right standing with God.

But, Christ is wrong, the world can receive the Holy Spirit?

1 cor 2:14 isnt either, its talking to believers. Who are natural men. The point is that the Holyspirit is who enlightens. Not their worldly wisdom.
Do you mean to say that there are regenerate men who are yet natural men? Do you believe that there are "carnal christians"?

The context is contrasting believers with the world.
 
Last edited:
A

Abiding

Guest


Of course it applies in all fields, especially when it comes to a right standing with God.

But, Christ is wrong, the world can receive the Holy Spirit?


John 14:17 yes im sure there is a wide application. But not in your case. Who is talking about
whether unregenerate people have the Holyspirit? I sure wasnt..

And 1 cor 2:14 yes are you still not natural?

[SUP]5 [/SUP]that your faith should not be in the wisdom of men but in the power of God.

I like to think of this context when i see socalled apologists talk to athiests with science etc
rather than the gospel.

But i also see the same apologists training church folk with the same human wisdom...which only
speaks to their natural man. And does nothing really to the innerman.

tribesman im trying to understand how people differ with me from scripture. thats
where im a little lost. I dont want to battle anyones systematic theology, if that
thrilled me id just google and learn the tricks of a 500 years old debate.



Do you mean to say that there are regenerate men who are yet natural men? Do you believe that there are "carnal christians"?



John 14:17 yes im sure there is a wide application. But not in your case. Who is talking about
whether unregenerate people have the Holyspirit? I sure wasnt..

And 1 cor 2:14 yes are you still not natural?

[SUP]5 [/SUP]that your faith should not be in the wisdom of men but in the power of God.

I like to think of this context when i see socalled apologists talk to athiests with science etc
rather than the gospel.

But i also see the same apologists training church folk with the same human wisdom...which only
speaks to their natural man. And does nothing really to the innerman.

tribesman im trying to understand how people differ with me from scripture. thats
where im a little lost. I dont want to battle anyones systematic theology, if that
thrilled me id just google and learn the tricks of a 500 years old debate.

I understand the carnal christian thingy from Romans 8, its not relevant here.
 
A

Abiding

Guest
why did Jesus weep over the city?
 
B

BarlyGurl

Guest
There's nothing in scripture that mentions this "free will" of which you speak and there's nothing in scripture that speaks of salvation being condition on such a choice. Nothing, zero, nil.

Inner work? A work that man does by his "free will choice"?

You say it is conditional on man. Scripture says its conditional on Christ.
No I didn't... did you even thoughtfully READ what I wrote?? The principal of freewill is thru out scripture... FROM THE BEGINNING. God created man in his image... doesn't GOD have free will? From the beginning MAN/woman was PERFECT, he gave them ONE command... DO NOT EAT FROM THE TREE OF KNOWLEDGE OF GOOD AND EVIL. If man didn't have FREEWILL God wouldn't have had to command anything...they just would have continued on in sinless perfection. Satan BEGUILED/temped EVE... she CHOSE... she made a choice to do what God said not to. Once the FRuit was eaten... BAM... thier eyes were opened and SIN entered the world... the GOD spirit DIED in them-> fellowship/realtionship was broken... them we have an entire test from there that is God working out how to reconcile US back to HIM. Man does not save himself... nothing of a MAN's work can save him... but by CHOICE he can be reconciled to God thru Jesus Christ. BY CHOICE of ADAM mankind FELL... by CHOICE of individuals we can be reconciled back to GOD... THE TERMS ARE GOD's just like the TERMS were God's from his first COMMAND to Adam.
YOU are required to accept the GIFT of CHRIST's perfect sinless SACRIFICE in accordance with GOD's TERMS of you aren't saved...PERIOD. This is GOD setting the terms... we accept or refuse... his terms our choice. Just like the the friend left a gift at the police station analogy I used previously. So you Can TRY to twist my words... but the BIBLE is very clear about this... I shouldn't have to re-paste the bible here for you... Try humbling yourself that GOD has provided you with witnesses to your error... INCLUDING a woman... you can receive or reject it at your own FREEWILL Volition. I would recommend you prayerfully seek GOd to Open the scripture to you and SHOW YOU at least the principal of freewill... since it is there. I do not think it is a good idea for you to remain loyal to the teaching of a sect... when God is surrounding you with people who are trying to encourage you to re-think some aspects of your theology. But then I guess you COULD hope he send you a talking DONKEY... would that get your attention?
 

tribesman

Senior Member
Oct 13, 2011
4,621
281
83
John 14:17 yes im sure there is a wide application. But not in your case. Who is talking about whether unregenerate people have the Holyspirit? I sure wasnt..
My point was that Jesus' statement is categorical. The world can not receive the Holy Spirit. This same can not this same Jesus also used in referring to in receiving Him and ultimately salvation, which he said is "impossible" for men. You don't think these includes the will of the unregenerate?

Maybe you don't say that the unregenerate has the Spirit - but, is it not so that you think that the Spirit assists basically "all men" in "prevenient grace" and therein gives them free volition to "receive" from God? None of which is scriptural.

And 1 cor 2:14 yes are you still not natural?.
???

tribesman im trying to understand how people differ with me from scripture. thats
where im a little lost. I dont want to battle anyones systematic theology, if that
thrilled me id just google and learn the tricks of a 500 years old debate.
You're battling the concept of free will in salvation and the nature/role of faith in justification. Whether your take on it comes from literal "interpretation", the tradition you are/were part of or some mindset that "it has to be" a certain way, there is no scriptural support for such. It assumes many things which are either very weak in scripture (all too weak to build such a crucial key doctrine on) or are not found in scripture at all. Free will in spiritual matters are usually but a mere philosophical solution to a theological problem. It always assume a lot of things which are not scriptural or it fills in the "blanks" it see in scripture instead of letting those be.

Let's look at a key scripture here:

Eph.2

[1] And you hath he quickened, who were dead in trespasses and sins;
[2] Wherein in time past ye walked according to the course of this world, according to the prince of the power of the air, the spirit that now worketh in the children of disobedience:
[3] Among whom also we all had our conversation in times past in the lusts of our flesh, fulfilling the desires of the flesh and of the mind; and were by nature the children of wrath, even as others.
[4] But God, who is rich in mercy, for his great love wherewith he loved us,
[5] Even when we were dead in sins, hath quickened us together with Christ, ( by grace ye are saved; )
[6] And hath raised us up together, and made us sit together in heavenly places in Christ Jesus:
[7] That in the ages to come he might shew the exceeding riches of his grace in his kindness toward us through Christ Jesus.
[8] For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God:
[9] Not of works, lest any man should boast.
See this? No space to boast. Not even about one's "decision to receive" anything. Why? Because it is not your own doing.

What saves? Grace! A work wholly outside of us. Just as the work of quickening us from the dead. Faith works than as an instrument where this is taken up in us. But it is not conditioned on us nor our doing. It is all a GIFT.

There is nothing about any "free will" here. There is nothing about any condition being fulfilled in us before God can bestow this upon us, not even the condition to use any would be ability to receive something. And that not of yourselves, in any way, shape or form. We are but passive recipients of an undeserved grace. It is all the work of God and to Him alone goes all the glory for it.
 
Last edited:

tribesman

Senior Member
Oct 13, 2011
4,621
281
83
No I didn't... did you even thoughtfully READ what I wrote?? The principal of freewill is thru out scripture... FROM THE BEGINNING. God created man in his image... doesn't GOD have free will? From the beginning MAN/woman was PERFECT, he gave them ONE command... DO NOT EAT FROM THE TREE OF KNOWLEDGE OF GOOD AND EVIL. If man didn't have FREEWILL God wouldn't have had to command anything...they just would have continued on in sinless perfection. Satan BEGUILED/temped EVE... she CHOSE... she made a choice to do what God said not to. Once the FRuit was eaten... BAM... thier eyes were opened and SIN entered the world... the GOD spirit DIED in them-> fellowship/realtionship was broken... them we have an entire test from there that is God working out how to reconcile US back to HIM. Man does not save himself... nothing of a MAN's work can save him... but by CHOICE he can be reconciled to God thru Jesus Christ. BY CHOICE of ADAM mankind FELL... by CHOICE of individuals we can be reconciled back to GOD... THE TERMS ARE GOD's just like the TERMS were God's from his first COMMAND to Adam. YOU are required to accept the GIFT of CHRIST's perfect sinless SACRIFICE in accordance with GOD's TERMS of you aren't saved...PERIOD. This is GOD setting the terms... we accept or refuse... his terms our choice. Just like the the friend left a gift at the police station analogy I used previously. So you Can TRY to twist my words... but the BIBLE is very clear about this... I shouldn't have to re-paste the bible here for you...
Are you saying that man has the same free will after the fall as before the fall?

I read what you wrote. It is obvious you believe in conditionalism.

By the way, I have not said we should not receive what is spoken of here. What we differ on, as far as east is from the west seemingly, is when and how this happens. I believe this happens as a fruit of God's work in us, you believe it is up to natural man and his "free will".

Try humbling yourself that GOD has provided you with witnesses to your error... INCLUDING a woman... you can receive or reject it at your own FREEWILL Volition. I would recommend you prayerfully seek GOd to Open the scripture to you and SHOW YOU at least the principal of freewill... since it is there. I do not think it is a good idea for you to remain loyal to the teaching of a sect... when God is surrounding you with people who are trying to encourage you to re-think some aspects of your theology. But then I guess you COULD hope he send you a talking DONKEY... would that get your attention?
Aha, you're into "I am right, you are wrong". I usually don't waste my time with people who go on like that, since its meaningless. Just sayin'. And, sorry, so far you have only proven your own error and hypocrisy. Loudmouthingly so.
 
A

Abiding

Guest
My point was that Jesus' statement is categorical. The world can not receive the Holy Spirit. This same can not this same Jesus also used in referring to in receiving Him and ultimately salvation, which he said is "impossible" for men. You don't think these includes the will of the unregenerate?

Maybe you don't say that the unregenerate has the Spirit - but, is it not so that you think that the Spirit assists basically "all men" in "prevenient grace" and therein gives them free volition to "receive" from God? None of which is scriptural.



???



You're battling the concept of free will in salvation and the nature/role of faith in justification. Whether your take on it comes from literal "interpretation", the tradition you are/were part of or some mindset that "it has to be" a certain way, there is no scriptural support for such. It assumes many things which are either very weak in scripture (all too weak to build such a crucial key doctrine on) or are not found in scripture at all. Free will in spiritual matters are usually but a mere philosophical solution to a theological problem. It always assume a lot of things which are not scriptural or it fills in the "blanks" it see in scripture instead of letting those be.

Let's look at a key scripture here:



See this? No space to boast. Not even about one's "decision to receive" anything. Why? Because it is not your own doing.

What saves? Grace! A work wholly outside of us. Just as the work of quickening us from the dead. Faith works than as an instrument where this is taken up in us. But it is not conditioned on us nor our doing. It is all a GIFT.

There is nothing about any "free will" here. There is nothing about any condition being fulfilled in us before God can bestow this upon us, not even the condition to use any would be ability to receive something. And that not of yourselves, in any way, shape or form. We are but passive recipients of an undeserved grace. It is all the work of God and to Him alone goes all the glory for it.

I dont hold a position that man has freewill(depends on definition). Or that we choose God unaided. And receiving the gospel or a gift is not a reason to boast.

What other condition would we be in but dead in sins when He quickened us? Of coarse we are saved by Grace.
 

tribesman

Senior Member
Oct 13, 2011
4,621
281
83
I dont hold a position that man has freewill(depends on definition). Or that we choose God unaided. And receiving the gospel or a gift is not a reason to boast.

What other condition would we be in but dead in sins when He quickened us? Of coarse we are saved by Grace.
But you say that man get free will in prevenient grace, wherein he is "aided" by God to either positively respond or negatively reject what he "offers"? This means that the outcome is conditioned on the sinner not on the work of Christ alone. There is no way around this. The biggest savior of the sinner will be his own will wherewith he can outsmart other sinners who weren't as wise as him. An occasion to boast.
 
B

BarlyGurl

Guest
Aha, you're into "I am right, you are wrong". I usually don't waste my time with people who go on like that, since its meaningless. Just sayin'. And, sorry, so far you have only proven your own error and hypocrisy. Loudmouthingly so.[/QUOTE]

Well If that's what you get out of it fine... I was making an observation, having noticed several people have tried to reason with you, recalling your "women shall not teach" thread commentary and trying to use a scriptural imagry to perhaps goad you into prayerful consideration Which you clearly DID NOT pursue based on your rapid response with your "AHA". Sorry there is no guile here... and I haven't come with an attitude to win an argument...rather to win my brother since i have no quarrel with you... if you were my brother I think you should have noticed the point was to consider prayerfully... not to escalate to mud slinging. Using the verbiage "Loudmouthedly and contesceious" says more about were your heart is at than mine :(
 
Last edited by a moderator:

tribesman

Senior Member
Oct 13, 2011
4,621
281
83
Well If that's what you get out of it fine... I was making an observation, having noticed several people have tried to reason with you, recalling your "women shall not teach" thread commentary and trying to use a scriptural imagry to perhaps goad you into prayerful consideration Which you clearly DID NOT pursue based on your rapid response with your "AHA". Sorry there is no guile here... and I haven't come with an attitude to win an argument...rather to win my brother since i have no quarrel with you... if you were my brother I think you should have noticed the point was to consider prayerfully... not to escalate to mud slinging. :(
You have not come to me as a sibling. And your spirit is everything than meek and quiet. If you dislike my biblical take on female officers then so be it. It has nothing to do with this thread and by way of netiquette it shouldn't have been mentioned. Let's at least keep the thread on-topic.
 
A

Abiding

Guest
But you say that man get free will in prevenient grace, wherein he is "aided" by God to either positively respond or negatively reject what he "offers"? This means that the outcome is conditioned on the sinner not on the work of Christ alone. There is no way around this. The biggest savior of the sinner will be his own will wherewith he can outsmart other sinners who weren't as wise as him. An occasion to boast.
Yup thats it. I wouldnt see it the way you put it. Or say it that way.
Abraham believed and it was accounted him for righteousness.... <--------id put it that way.
 

tribesman

Senior Member
Oct 13, 2011
4,621
281
83
Yup thats it. I wouldnt see it the way you put it. Or say it that way.
Abraham believed and it was accounted him for righteousness.... <--------id put it that way.
Settled then. You do believe in salvation conditioned on the sinner.

Then Abraham could boast about being smart enough to "choose the right".

Btw, didn't all men without exception get the same "offer" as Abraham? He just simply outsmarted (most of) the rest.

PS. The deeper issue is of course what caused Abraham to believe.
 
Last edited:
G

GreenNnice

Guest
Tribers:
You say it is conditional on man. Scripture says its conditional on Christ.


^ Show it^
 

tribesman

Senior Member
Oct 13, 2011
4,621
281
83
Tribers:
You say it is conditional on man. Scripture says its conditional on Christ.


^ Show it^
Read through the posts here and you will see it. Scriptures provided.
 
A

Abiding

Guest
Settled then. You do believe in salvation conditioned on the sinner.

Then Abraham could boast about being smart enough to "choose the right".

Btw, didn't all men without exception get the same "offer" as Abraham? He just simply outsmarted (most of) the rest.

PS. The deeper issue is of course what caused Abraham to believe.
No thats not at all what i said. Thats what you said.
The bible is full of reasons why man refuses and its not about intellect,
 

tribesman

Senior Member
Oct 13, 2011
4,621
281
83
No thats not at all what i said. Thats what you said.
The bible is full of reasons why man refuses and its not about intellect,
What are you saying now then?

And whatever way you want to put things, you do hold to conditionalism. There is a part to be fulfilled in man, even if it is just his assent, before God is able to save him.
 
A

Abiding

Guest
heres one:

[SUP]8 [/SUP]And then shall that Wicked be revealed, whom the Lord shall consume with the spirit of his mouth, and shall destroy with the brightness of his coming:
[SUP]9 [/SUP]Even him, whose coming is after the working of Satan with all power and signs and lying wonders,
[SUP]10 [/SUP]And with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that perish; because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved.
[SUP]11 [/SUP]And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie:
[SUP]12 [/SUP]That they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness.


i understand i left off the remaining verses. but dont bother, because
ive heard it before and its just too much eisegesis for me
 
A

Abiding

Guest
What are you saying now then?

And whatever way you want to put things, you do hold to conditionalism. There is a part to be fulfilled in man, even if it is just his assent, before God is able to save him.
Im not talking about Gods ability. His ability has never been the issue.
 
B

BarlyGurl

Guest
And your spirit is everything than meek and quiet.
[h=2]Definition of MEEK[/h]1
: enduring injury with patience and without resentment : mild Which I have demonstrated at your attempts to subjugate me

2
: deficient in spirit and courage : submissive The Holy Spirit overrides it is By Him I have courage, I am SUBMISSIVE to CHRIST in me

3
: not violent or strong : moderate I have demonstrated no violence or strong-arm tactics here
My spirit is quiet... Not silent as you seem to allude... there is no warring in my spirit. It is considerably presumptious to assert to judge the condition of my spirit from a simple conversation and alluding allegations with respect to my femininity is inappropriate... God sees you.

 

tribesman

Senior Member
Oct 13, 2011
4,621
281
83
Im not talking about Gods ability. His ability has never been the issue.
Don't mix grain and grape and avoid splitting hairs. OK?

As long as you have a or any "part" to be fulfilled in man for his salvation then the consequence of that is that salvation is conditioned on him and not on Christ alone.