P
peterT
Guest
Matthew 11:17 And saying, We have piped unto you, and ye have not danced; we have mourned unto you, and ye have not lamented
Yes, but is God just? Would a holy God send His covenant people to hell for not believing truths He prevented them from seeing? How can the Jews know doctrines that God has sovereignly blinded them from seeing, Romans 11:8?
Well, I have never believed that salvation depended on having the right doctrine, if it did, then salvation could depend, not on heart condition, but on head knowledge and on when you were born in history. According to Micah 6:8 and many other verses, salvation depends on having a right heart before God.
Yes, but is God just? Would a holy God send His covenant people to hell for not believing truths He prevented them from seeing? How can the Jews know doctrines that God has sovereignly blinded them from seeing, Romans 11:8?
G4138
πλήρωμα
plērōma
play'-ro-mah
From G4137; repletion or completion, that is, (subjectively) what fills (as contents, supplement, copiousness, multitude), or (objectively) what is filled (as container, performance, period): - which is put in to fill up, piece that filled up, fulfilling, full, fulness.
There are still Gentiles coming to the Lord daily so the completion or fulness of the Gentiles has not occurred.
Let’s not try comparing apples to oranges it just doesn’t work.
2Th speaks of those given a spirit of delusion, Romans talks about those given a spirit of slumber. The spirit of delusion is not the spirit of slumber. If Paul meant the same spirit why give it a different name?
Then use Scripture to prove the view espoused to be in error.
In your unproven opinion maybe my views on the bible aren't deemed credible, but until you prove your vew correct it s nothing more then an irrelevant unproven opinion.On the other hand when one misrepresents (i.E. Lis) about what soeone else is saying they have already proven their own lack of credibility. So do you believe that those who are willing to misrepresent(I.E. LIE about) what others are saying are credible?
The only way to see the kingdom of God is to be born again, the branches broken out come to know Christ through the New Testament or perish. But for the sovereignly blinded Jew that is not allowed to see the truth of the first advent of Christ and the gospel, they can only come to know Christ through the Scriptures they are allowed to see, the Old Testament. It is all about which ones God chose to use to keep His everlasting covenant alive. After all if God did not keep some of the Jews under the Old Covenant it would not be an everlasting covenant.
Heb 8:13 In that he saith, A new covenant, he hath made the first old. Now that which decayeth and waxeth old is ready to vanish away.
While it may be ready to vanish and wax away it hasn’t or it would not be an everlasting covenant. For it to be an everlasting covenant there must be a remanant of the Jews still observing it. Those Jews are the enemies of the gospel that are elect.
I see you chose not to address the questions I asked. Shall I assume from your silence you have no Scripturally sound explanation of how one can be an enemy of the gospel and elect at the same time?
Yes, but is God just? Would a holy God send His covenant people to hell for not believing truths He prevented them from seeing? How can the Jews know doctrines that God has sovereignly blinded them from seeing, Romans 11:8?
Read Isaiah 28 where paul was quoting from. Israel is no exception to any other nation.
When you turn your back on God in unbelief He will harden you. The believers He shows mercy.
Yes, He did not prevent them from seeing it. He hardened their hearts like he always does. He confronted them with truth, and they rejected, the more they rejected, the easier it was..
Brother, it is improper exegesis to use one verse to negate the intent oif another. Both are the word of God. So the question remains: Is it just for God to blind His covenant people for 2000 years so they cannot see the Gospel and then send them to hell for not accepting the Gospel. Even I, a wretchedly sinful human, am more just and merciful than that.
According to Romans 11:8 the Jews as a people were given a total inability to see the Gospel. So were they blinded to be lost? Romans 11:11 says they were not.
So the question we should be asking is: Why did God blind the Jews from hearing the Gospel for almost 2000 years? The answer to all this is not in negatating the meaning of any verse, but in finding how this all fits together.
that's all your own personal interpretation, which you have so much invested in now - you're trapped.Brother, it is improper exegesis to use one verse to negate the intent oif another. Both are the word of God. So the question remains: Is it just for God to blind His covenant people for 2000 years so they cannot see the Gospel and then send them to hell for not accepting the Gospel. Even I, a wretchedly sinful human, am more just and merciful than that.
According to Romans 11:8 the Jews as a people were given a total inability to see the Gospel. So were they blinded to be lost? Romans 11:11 says they were not.
So the question we should be asking is: Why did God blind the Jews from hearing the Gospel for almost 2000 years? The answer to all this is not in negatating the meaning of any verse, but in finding how this all fits together.
And the same manner as the Gentiles
So God blinded the Jews to the Gospel for the 2000 years since the Cross and then sends them all to hell for not believing in a Gospel God blinded them from seeing? I worship a far more loving, merciful and just God than that.
That only happens to dispensationalists.
What are you talking about i gave you a chapter and you respond that i gave you a verse?
No of coarse it isnt just. Thats why God never did that. That only happens to dispensationalists.
the 2000 year future thingy. The all Israel will be saved is not a future thing nor does it mean
everyone in the nation. Noone has been lost. If one was then all Israel will be saved would be a tall tail.
Very Good. If I understand you correctly, you agree that Jews during the Christian era can be saved withour recognizing Jesus as their Messiah. That's the point I've been trying to get across all along. <smile> Salvation for the Jews is not dependant on him having his doctrine updated, but on him having a humble and contrite heart towards God.
How will they be forgiven and made New? Mercy and not Sacrifice, how will they learn what this means without accepting the Messiah?
Jews during the Christian era are saved in exactly the same way all the saints in the Old Testament were saved, by grace through faith. Salvation does not depend on having the right doctrine, but on having a humble and repentant heart towards God.
We in the New Testament era are not saved by knowing the four spiritual laws and saying the sinners prayer, but by coming to God and asking Him to forgive us for our sins, through the blood of His Son, Jesus. Now Old Testament saints didn't have that knowledge, but they had to have that same repentant heart, and God the Father who recognized His Son as crucified in eternity, accepted that same sacrifice for them. The blood of the Lord Jesus flows both ways in time . . . .
Micah 6:8 "He hath showed thee, O man, what is good; and what doth Jehovah require of thee, but to do justly, and to love kindness, and to walk humbly with thy God?"
Despite all our dogmas to the contrary, notice that there are no additional hoops you have to jump through and that no doctrinal head knowledge is required. Of course, once the Holy Spirit makes biblical truth known to you, obedience to those truths is then required.