First you bash the Catholic church, then mainline Protestantism, then Quakers.
I have my doubts about the RCC being a 'church' at all, true, but that's a notion that I share with a lot of people here. I wouldn't call what I've said about the RCC 'bashing'though. I do have comments on how liberal christians interpret the Bible, true, but that's something completely different from 'bashing' mainline protestantism in general. I would never do that, since they are still brothers and sisters in Christ. I said: 'what I've read about the Quakers,' so that doesn't necessarily make it my opinion. But thank you forgiving me an idea on the way they read the Bible. Now...again, back to the topic... please.
Even if I weren't a liberal Christian who happened to like quakerzen, the person on Christian Chat, and Quakers in general (those I've met), I would say you have WAY overstepped it here. I am disappointed that other chatters have not likewise chastised you for your FAR from Christian behavior.Better than you apparently, especially when it comes to reading to scripture.
{snip}
Oh, and I'm not at all impressed by the Quackers, from what I've read about them they are freethinkers and their theology comes dangerously close to that of the gnosis. So I wouldn't be suprised if they had sympathy for the liberal agenda too.
there is nothing wrong with the liberal agenda in the first place.
The Liberal Agenda
Call to order and roll call
Approval of minutes from previous meeting
Reports from officers
Open Issues:
New Business:
- feed the hungry
- clothe the naked
- visit the lonely
- heal the sick
Adjourn
What's so radical about that?
Probably because it doesnt help the rest of the believers as they pray for yachts and promotions?
(...) I am not going to tell you what you should or should not do, but I will do my Christian duty and point out that your behavior towards quakerzen has been nothing less than sin.
No offense but are you a catholic yourself? You won't believe the stories that have come out the last couple of months about child abuse in the roman catholic 'church.' Priests and other clergy are seldomly punished for their offenses though. And I see no reason why a conservative 'church' as the 'church' of Rome would do away with one of her treasured traditions all of a sudden. And NO, statistically speaking the child abuse is MUCH more rampant in the catholic 'church,' so I'm certainly not trying to stigmatize just ONE group. Child abuse is rare in the protestant churches, because we don't facilitate it, end of story.
Except that the majority of Gay Marriage proponents, dont care at all whether or not churches allow it. They just want governmental acknowledgement and benefits...So ive yet to understand why the church is so involved...
Because they have the human right to do so. Whether you agree with it or not.
False Argument...
God's plain directive Gen. 1:27-28 " male and female he created them...be fruitful and multiply"
From the beginning it was God's design for male and female to mate and procreate in the PERFECT environment of the Garden of Eden. It was not until AFTER sin ravaged the world that it became necessary for God to institute further directives regarding morality... sexual or otherwise.
\
I think YOU'RE reading things into the text. It never says God provided him with a wife. It does say that they were the only people... so...
I'm not defending incest in reality. I'm poking holes in your arguments against homosexuality. If Genesis can't be used to defend incest, it can't be used to defend "traditional marriage" because it provides examples of both.
Liberal agenda? Haha. Go back to highschool, kid. There's no "liberal agenda" in the Quaker congregation. We just know how to interpret the Bible for ourselves instead of being taught things that are interpreted, pretty much from translations of the Bible.
Homosexuals aren't after civil unions. They are seeking to do the impossible: redefine God's covenant of marriage to mean what they want it to mean rather than what God made it to be.
In spiritual terms, their efforts are futile. Even if they are successful in their effort to have homosexual marriage both legalized and made socially acceptable, God still won't recognize their "marriages" because they are illegitimate.
They can legalize it, make it socially acceptable, and conduct them in a church with Catholic priests and Christian pastors presiding, with their names printed on a legal certificate of marriage and they'll still be living in sin afterwards exactly as before but even more deceived than before.
Homosexual "marriage" is as illegitimate in God's definition as "marriage" between a people and animals.
Probably because it doesnt help the rest of the believers as they pray for yachts and promotions?
Why did God allow incest in the Bible?EXACTLY! Couldn't have said it better myself.
Also Leviticus 20:11-17 opposes incest.
This is a good explanation of why incest was "ok" and why God later on oulawed it for anyone who is interested. Which is pretty well just a longer explanation of what BarlyGurl just said.