A
The Dutch Reform Church, is a DUTCH institution with MANY unbiblical practises... Let me share just one... They use the Heidelburg Catacasm dictrine for the teaching in their Sunday School.... In the early phaze of teaching children they make a statement.... God sometimes says Yes, somethimes say NO and some times says wait. (to his children) Then I asked them to please give me a verse that will confirm this, and they could not.
I don't see what's wrong with baptising infants. I really don't.
Sarah, did God also say NO to you? When God said to Paul... NO! Did God say no or YES? What was God's ANSWER to Paul? And I ask you again did God SAY no to you? Please share with me... and I will SHOW you God said YES to Paul not NO!
Originally Posted by CobusThe Dutch Reform Church, is a DUTCH institution with MANY unbiblical practises... Let me share just one... They use the Heidelburg Catacasm dictrine for the teaching in their Sunday School.... In the early phaze of teaching children they make a statement.... God sometimes says Yes, somethimes say NO and some times says wait. (to his children) Then I asked them to please give me a verse that will confirm this, and they could not.
Zone,
I need to apologize to you,I should have suggested a different thread for that.
(sorry to contribute to derailment, kath)
Sorry Zone, Sarah and I can take it up privately. So what do you say about the BAPTISM in ONE NAME....? Did you give it ANY attention or am I on your ignore list?
I can't believe this guy saying that baptism in the holy Spirit has ceased! Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born of water and of the Spirit he cannot enter into the kingdom of God. That which is born of the flesh is flesh; and that which is born of the Spirit is spirit - basically, this is baptism in the holy Spirit. (being filled with the Spirit - new birth - new creation, new man) Water does not change the inside, only cleanses the outside of a person, but the Spirit does.k....so far found one site claiming water baptism ceased. but it has a virus so....
but will keep looking. if anyone has anything on it i can read i would be grateful.
i thought this guy was going to say it...so i read the whole article (short). he covers the various baptisms we've been discussing.
but then he closes with this (might as well post it):
Now, Though, "There Is One Baptism"
<snip>
Since there is now, in our age, "one baptism," which of the two, water or Holy Spirit, has ceased? When the purpose of the baptisms that have ceased was fulfilled, the baptism ceased. For example, when the baptism "unto Moses" achieved its purpose, when Israel was finally separated from Egyptian bondage, that baptism was never repeated. When the baptism of John accomplished its purpose, it, too, was terminated (Acts 19:1-5).
Again. . . .amazing. . .To have all truth we need to be led by the Spirit of truth. . .the Comforter, i.e. the holy Spirit.Thus, of the two, water or Holy Spirit baptism, which has fulfilled its purpose, its mission? Is the word of God incomplete? Do men today need to receive more truth? No, for we have "all truth," "the perfect law of liberty," "all things that pertain unto life and godliness," "the faith once (one time for all time) delivered" (Jn. 16:13; Jas. 1:25; 2 Pet. 1:3; Jude 3). The Scriptures are able to furnish the man of God completely unto every good work (2 Tim. 3:16, 17). Hence, we do not need to receive the baptism of the Holy Spirit as the apostles received it. The purpose has been fulfilled. We have all truth, the whole and complete truth of God.
<snip>
Mark 16:16 is questionable because Mark 16:9-20, by some scholars, were added at a later date and even questionable if Mark even wrote them.When the purpose of the baptism of Moses was met, it ended, never to be repeated again. When John's baptism met its goal, it was no longer valid. Likewise, since the purposes of Holy Spirit baptism have been fulfilled, it is no longer being employed. Jesus is not baptizing people in the Holy Spirit as he once did.
What of water baptism? Does it continue? If so, why? Well, water baptism in the name of Christ is "for the remission of sins" (Acts 2:38). Men must be baptized in order to be saved (Mk. 16:16). Do men today need the forgiveness of sins? Do men today still need to be saved? If so, then water baptism continues. It will exist as long as there are men who need to be forgiven of their sins and saved. So, since there is "one baptism," which one is left? Which one, of all the baptisms previously cited, which one has a purpose that is still necessary? Which baptism is needed with respect to its purpose as stated in Scripture? Why, water baptism, of course.
Now, if ever there comes a time when everyone is saved, if there were ever a time when there were no lost sinners, if every man were forgiven, would water baptism continue? No, for its purpose would no longer be necessary. That is why the other baptisms ceased. So, water baptism would end and would no longer be practiced if everyone were saved. Obviously, that has not happened, and water baptism continues. It is, therefore, the "one baptism" of Ephesians 4:5.
There Is ... One Baptism ~ Larry Ray Hafley < click
he rejects kids etc be baptised (i think)
dunno.
processing.....
I can't believe this guy saying that baptism in the holy Spirit has ceased! Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born of water and of the Spirit he cannot enter into the kingdom of God. That which is born of the flesh is flesh; and that which is born of the Spirit is spirit - basically, this is baptism in the holy Spirit.