Trophimus in 2 Timothy 4:20

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

crossnote

Senior Member
Nov 24, 2012
30,709
3,651
113
#21
How bout God is sovereign and heals when,where, how and whoooo.
 

Elizabeth619

Senior Member
Jul 19, 2011
6,397
109
48
#22
It seems a mystery why some are not healed, but then again it also seems that faith has a lot to do with it as Jesus couldn't heal those that had no faith...and again when Jesus did heal He said "according to your faith you are healed" so maybe that means big faith = big healing , little faith = little healing and no faith = no healing.
I don't think because someone does not get healed that it means the gift has ceased because of the above.
I think healing by faith is referring to spiriual healing.
I am referring to physical healing. Jesus healed many who did not beleive. After they saw his miracles they followed him. That was the purpose of his miracles. So people would beleive.
 
Feb 17, 2010
3,620
27
0
#23
In James we read it is actually the people that pray for health that should have faith, not the sick person. And Elizabeth there we read that the sickness as well as the sin would be removed... But there is a condition...

Read this, and see how God CANNOT say no to healing done this way.... The only NO to healing is LACK OF FAITH FROM ELDERS!...

WOW!
Is any sick among you? let him call for the elders of the church; and let them pray over him, anointing him with oil in the name of the Lord:
Jas 5:15 And the prayer of faith shall save the sick, and the Lord shall raise him up; and if he have committed sins, they shall be forgiven him.

Who else see that God will NEVER say no to a faithful group of elders? I believe this with my whole heart! Seen it happen before, obviously helps.
 
J

jimmydiggs

Guest
#24
He can heal anyone he wants, but why didn't this happen? Why was it mentioned he was left sick?
How come Jesus didn't heal the Chinese? He could have. Oh noes! Therefor, Jesus didn't do any miracles at all.

Stick to scripture. ;)

There is an argument against modern miracles in scripture, and you're not using it.
 
J

jimmydiggs

Guest
#25
How bout God is sovereign and heals when,where, how and whoooo.
Amen.

I wish this whole CoC propoganda stuff wouldn't be used as support of Cessation of miracles. The CoC worldview is more effected by 19th century perceptions of a mechanical universe than it is by Christianity.
 

Elizabeth619

Senior Member
Jul 19, 2011
6,397
109
48
#26
How come Jesus didn't heal the Chinese? He could have. Oh noes! Therefor, Jesus didn't do any miracles at all.

Stick to scripture. ;)

There is an argument against modern miracles in scripture, and you're not using it.
Give it time. I will get to what I need to in time my dear friend. I am actually interesting in seeing others views. I have my view, but I could have overlooked something.

Until I came across this scripture, I always thought the ceasing happened when the apostles died. That they had their gifts until the point of death. I never really thought they could fade, and they were not able to perform miracles as often as they first could.
I am also looking at how they did cease. Did they cease upon death or did they fade. It may seem insignificant to some to ponder it, but if I am wrong in my understanding I want to correct it.
 

Elizabeth619

Senior Member
Jul 19, 2011
6,397
109
48
#27
Amen.

I wish this whole CoC propoganda stuff wouldn't be used as support of Cessation of miracles. The CoC worldview is more effected by 19th century perceptions of a mechanical universe than it is by Christianity.
Unless you know what the Church of Christ actually believes then it is best not to comment on it. I do not believe in the ceasing of gifts because I attend the Church of Christ. This belief isn't restricted to just the CoC. There some branches of the CoC they do still believe in spiritual gifts btw. Before you try to slam a persons belief then at least know what they do believe. Otherwise you look like an ignorant troublemaker.
 
J

jimmydiggs

Guest
#28
Unless you know what the Church of Christ actually believes then it is best not to comment on it.
Depending upon which branch, the Churches of Chrst (proper that is) deny the doctrine of Original Sin, and are fiercely anti-calvinist. They hate monergism.

They have beeen enamored with 19th century ideals, rather than scripture. This thread is just a propoganda thread.

I do not believe in the ceasing of gifts because I attend the Church of Christ.
Not a problem, I haven't said this.

This belief isn't restricted to just the CoC.
I think you miss the point of my post. My post wasn't a criticism of cessationism. I am generally cessationist (though not totally, I believe God intervenes as I am a theist and not a diest).

There some branches of the CoC they do still believe in spiritual gifts btw.
Maybe the DoC, which is the liberal wing of the Restorationist denominations.


Before you try to slam a persons belief then at least know what they do believe.
I wasn't criticizing cessationism. I much prefer it over the Benny Hinn types.

Otherwise you look like an ignorant troublemaker.
I am by far ignorant, that I confess. For I know but a miniscule amount, compared to an omniscient God who knows all. As regards troublemaking, I have done nothing but sin all my days. There is not one iota of righteousness within me. I will let you proclaim yourself as righteous though.
 
J

jimmydiggs

Guest
#29
Give it time. I will get to what I need to in time my dear friend. I am actually interesting in seeing others views. I have my view, but I could have overlooked something.

Until I came across this scripture, I always thought the ceasing happened when the apostles died. That they had their gifts until the point of death. I never really thought they could fade, and they were not able to perform miracles as often as they first could.
I am also looking at how they did cease. Did they cease upon death or did they fade. It may seem insignificant to some to ponder it, but if I am wrong in my understanding I want to correct it.
I hope you start to use scripture, consistantly. Otherwise, thus far you have made a mockery of cessationism with the argument you present. "Oh noes! He didn't, but could have!"
 

Elizabeth619

Senior Member
Jul 19, 2011
6,397
109
48
#30
Never once have I stated what you accuse me of. It's clear you don't even know the purpose of this thread. I simply asked WHY he wasn't healed. Never once said he could have but didn't. That's not even biblical. Please do not take my words out of context.
 
A

Abiding

Guest
#31
So noones buying my Paul was a lunch bully huh?
 

crossnote

Senior Member
Nov 24, 2012
30,709
3,651
113
#32
Give it time. I will get to what I need to in time my dear friend. I am actually interesting in seeing others views. I have my view, but I could have overlooked something.

Until I came across this scripture, I always thought the ceasing happened when the apostles died. That they had their gifts until the point of death. I never really thought they could fade, and they were not able to perform miracles as often as they first could.
I am also looking at how they did cease. Did they cease upon death or did they fade. It may seem insignificant to some to ponder it, but if I am wrong in my understanding I want to correct it.
There is a view (Cornelius Stam in his Acts Dispensationally Considered) that holds that Acts was just a much of a telling of the waning and eventual postponement of the promised Kingdom to the Jews due to their overall unbelief than it had to do with the growth of the Church. Part of that 'waning ' involved the waning of the gifts..
 
J

jimmydiggs

Guest
#33
Never once have I stated what you accuse me of. It's clear you don't even know the purpose of this thread. I simply asked WHY he wasn't healed. Never once said he could have but didn't. That's not even biblical. Please do not take my words out of context.
Exhibit A:
He can heal anyone he wants, but why didn't this happen? Why was it mentioned he was left sick?
 

Elizabeth619

Senior Member
Jul 19, 2011
6,397
109
48
#35
Which is a prime example of you taking a comment out of context. Did you not even see the comment I actually replied to?

Maybe God just decided not to heal him. for he had no reason too. God can;t heal everything, we would never die.. lol
Yes, God can heal anyone he wants. He does at HIS will. Not ours. He can do whatever his will is. He is all powerful.
I NEVER said "he can, but doesn't" as if he doesn't want to. He will not do things that would go against his Word. He never promised that the Holy Spirit would physically heal every person on the planet. EG was correct in saying he can't heal everyone because we would never die...because that isn't His purpose.
Again, please do not take comments out of context. You came in this thread with intentions or starting something. Taking comments out of context, and condescending a person's church belief and congregation(which doesn't even pertain to this thread) is childish, and uncalled for.

If you would like to discuss the actual topic it would be appreciated. If not then our discussion is over.
 
J

jimmydiggs

Guest
#36
Which is a prime example of you taking a comment out of context. Did you not even see the comment I actually replied to?


Yes, God can heal anyone he wants. He does at HIS will. Not ours. He can do whatever his will is. He is all powerful.
I NEVER said "he can, but doesn't" as if he doesn't want to. He will not do things that would go against his Word. He never promised that the Holy Spirit would physically heal every person on the planet. EG was correct in saying he can't heal everyone because we would never die...because that isn't His purpose.
Again, please do not take comments out of context. You came in this thread with intentions or starting something.
So, if you did not say the bolded portion below, who did?

He can heal anyone he wants, but why didn't this happen?

Taking comments out of context, and condescending a person's church belief and congregation(which doesn't even pertain to this thread) is childish, and uncalled for.
I guess it is childish to speak against the false gospel of the catholic church?





If not then our discussion is over.
It never began. It was impossible from the start.
 

Elizabeth619

Senior Member
Jul 19, 2011
6,397
109
48
#37
So, if you did not say the bolded portion below, who did?




I guess it is childish to speak against the false gospel of the catholic church?





It never began. It was impossible from the start.
There you go again taking part of a comment, and making something of it that it never was intended. You do realize the who reason for this thread is why is it that Trophimus was not healed miraculously by Paul don't you?

Who is talking about catholics in this thread? Yet again you take comments out of context and blow stuff out of proportion. Never said one should speak against something they don't believe. Derailing a thread, and attacking someone about it when it doesnt even pertain to the topic is the problem....

You have yet to discuss the actual topic. You have derailed this thread long enough. Goodbye
 
1

1still_waters

Guest
#38
Most commentaries (Clarke's, Gill's, Wesley's for a start) that deal with it merely say that apostles do not have the power to heal at will, thus leaving someone ill is not unusual. That doesn't properly fit any of those five, but it is the prominent opinion on the mater...

Not much is said about it because its not an unusual or unexpected event.
Ok I'll amend it..

Here I'll give you six angles at the debate...

1. Well he obviously lacked faith and couldn't get his healing. Paul left him sick.
2. God never heals ever. So duh. He's left sick.
3. He clearly had sin in his life and hadn't repented yet. SO yeah he had to be left sick.
4. It wasn't God's time to heal him.
5. It's a sign the gifts of healing were fading out.
6. Some other option where they are left sick because the apostle can't heal at will, and they are left sick.

Edit that--->Now imagine all five of those perspectives arguing until they are repeating themselves, and adding 50 pages to this thread.

To that---->Now imagine all six of those perspectives arguing until they are repeating themselves, and adding 50 pages to this thread.
 

Elizabeth619

Senior Member
Jul 19, 2011
6,397
109
48
#39
Ok I'll amend it..

Here I'll give you six angles at the debate...

1. Well he obviously lacked faith and couldn't get his healing. Paul left him sick.
2. God never heals ever. So duh. He's left sick.
3. He clearly had sin in his life and hadn't repented yet. SO yeah he had to be left sick.
4. It wasn't God's time to heal him.
5. It's a sign the gifts of healing were fading out.
6. Some other option where they are left sick because the apostle can't heal at will, and they are left sick.

Edit that--->Now imagine all five of those perspectives arguing until they are repeating themselves, and adding 50 pages to this thread.

To that---->Now imagine all six of those perspectives arguing until they are repeating themselves, and adding 50 pages to this thread.
Yay! Finally! Someone who knows how to discuss topics of threads! Would it be a bad idea for people to post scripture supporting or disproving any of the 6 theories?
 
1

1still_waters

Guest
#40
Yay! Finally! Someone who knows how to discuss topics of threads! Would it be a bad idea for people to post scripture supporting or disproving any of the 6 theories?
I think we can cross off number 2.
Because it's completely stupid.
And completely unbiblical.