Adam and Eve only?

[A-Omega]

1 Corinthians 15:22For as in Adam all die, even so in Christ shall all be made alive

1 Corinthians 15:45And so it is written, The first man Adam was made a living soul; the last Adam was made a quickening spirit.

1 Timothy 2:13For Adam was first formed, then Eve.

Amen. Thank you for properly applying Scripture.

 

[crossnote]

Which is why God accepted Abel and not Cain. Don't twist it, take it for what it says.

Who are you addressing?

 

[Earlmayknowornot]

Everyone that reads this thread.

 

[crossnote]

Everyone that reads this thread.

Ok as long as you are not mixing me up with the two race dealy wheely.

 

[Earlmayknowornot]

Ok as long as you are not mixing me up with the two race dealy wheely.

Glad to hear that crossnote. Whew thank god.

 

[PS]

Adam (aw-dawm') is everyone, the whole of humankind.

man, mankind

any man (2), anyone (4), anyone's (1), being* (1), common sort* (1), human (19), infantry (1), low degree* (1), low* (1), man (363), man's (20), man* (1), mankind (9), men (104), men of low degree* (1), men's (3), men* (4), mortal (1), one (3), people (1), person (5), person* (1), persons (3), population (1), someone (1).

Genesis 2:19 Biblos Interlinear Bible

Somehow I feel I am talking to a brick wall.

The individual who fathered Cain and Able came much later.

This means when Jesus paid the price for Adam's sins it was for all of mankind.

 

[Earlmayknowornot]

​wow you mean nobody is going to debate against me on this. should I put this on my calendar. Well i will just praise God and give him the glory.Amen

 

[Hungry]

Thank you all for your responses. I really didn't have my mind made up as to whether it was an Adam and Eve only Genesis or whether a separate "man" was created. As expected there was quite the mix of answers. Not to throw fuel on this fire but does anyone have a clue to the Sons of God and daughters of men are referencing in the beginning of Genesis 6? This too has clouded understanding.

 

[PS]

Thank you all for your responses. I really didn't have my mind made up as to whether it was an Adam and Eve only Genesis or whether a separate "man" was created. As expected there was quite the mix of answers. Not to throw fuel on this fire but does anyone have a clue to the Sons of God and daughters of men are referencing in the beginning of Genesis 6? This too has clouded understanding.

For "Sons of God" CLICK HERE

Daughters of men is self explanatory.

 

[nathan3]

Thank you all for your responses. I really didn't have my mind made up as to whether it was an Adam and Eve only Genesis or whether a separate "man" was created. As expected there was quite the mix of answers. Not to throw fuel on this fire but does anyone have a clue to the Sons of God and daughters of men are referencing in the beginning of Genesis 6? This too has clouded understanding.

here are just a few scriptures, but it clears it up for me at least.

THE RAIN / "THE SONS OF GOD" IN GENESIS 6:2,4.

 

[PS]

Thank you all for your responses. I really didn't have my mind made up as to whether it was an Adam and Eve only Genesis or whether a separate "man" was created. As expected there was quite the mix of answers. Not to throw fuel on this fire but does anyone have a clue to the Sons of God and daughters of men are referencing in the beginning of Genesis 6? This too has clouded understanding.

You didn't ask about "Son of Man" but it needs to be explained so if you CLICK HERE all will be revealed.

 

[Hungry]

I'm beginning to wonder whether starting this thread is going to result in clarity or more confusion. Right out of the gate we have two conflicting theories. I've heard good debate for both sides.

 

[nathan3]

I'm beginning to wonder whether starting this thread is going to result in clarity or more confusion. Right out of the gate we have two conflicting theories. I've heard good debate for both sides.

Well, the simple way to clear that up is, weather or not it is written . Seems simple that way.

 

[Hungry]

PS what's your take on the Nephilim?

 

[Hungry]

Well, the simple way to clear that up is, weather or not it is written . Seems simple that way.

I think that is the problem. There isn't enough written to form a concrete case either way. I think Moses was writing to the Israelites who already had background info that we aren't privileged to.

 

[wdeaton65]

I'm beginning to wonder whether starting this thread is going to result in clarity or more confusion. Right out of the gate we have two conflicting theories. I've heard good debate for both sides.

Same old story Hungry. The oldest trick in the book hath GOD said Sons of GOD are the angels just like it reads Gen 6;2 6;4 Job 1;6 2;1 and cht. 38 Jude new this and so did Peter all of the people back then new this story and the archaeological evidence is over whelming You people out there keep adding and subtracting from the word of GOD and you will pay a great price in the end. Psalms 138;2 The only thing above the name of GOD is HIS word Yeshua Jesus Jh 1;1 Just trust that GOD knows what HE is doing Blessings

 

[PS]

PS what's your take on the Nephilim?

Seeing as the Bible tells us there were giants then obviously that is true and we shouldn't dispute it.

What we need to bear in mind is that angels are messengers and can be either human or divine and in the context of the Nephilim I suggest the intermarriage was between the Nephilim and the human messengers who were known as angels. (imo)

 

[wdeaton65]

Seeing as the Bible tells us there were giants then obviously that is true and we shouldn't dispute it.

What we need to bear in mind is that angels are messengers and can be either human or divine and in the context of the Nephilim I suggest the intermarriage was between the Nephilim and the human messengers who were known as angels. (imo)

This is not true!!!!!!!! There is no grey areas in the above mentioned scriptures. You might ask Hungry if people making these kind of statements can even read hebrew. They are listening to commentary.
2Pt 3;16 acts 17;11 those are there to protect you the reader.

 

[PS]

This is not true!!!!!!!! There is no grey areas in the above mentioned scriptures. You might ask Hungry if people making these kind of statements can even read hebrew. They are listening to commentary.
2Pt 3;16 acts 17;11 those are there to protect you the reader.

Magistrates and judges were spoken of as gods, see psalm 82 and in Gen 6:4 we read that the sons of God were Elohim which can be applied to ordinary men.

Gen 6:4 There were giants in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God (Elohim) came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown.

H430 'ĕlôhı̂ym Plural of H433; gods in the ordinary sense; occasionally applied by way of deference to magistrates; and sometimes as a superlative: - angels, X exceeding, God (gods) (-dess, -ly), X (very) great, judges and mighty.

If they were the sons of Elohim and not the sons of Jehovah then they were ordinary human beings.

 

[wdeaton65]

Magistrates and judges were spoken of as gods, see psalm 82 and in Gen 6:4 we read that the sons of God were Elohim which can be applied to ordinary men.

Gen 6:4 There were giants in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God (Elohim) came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown.

H430 'ĕlôhı̂ym Plural of H433; gods in the ordinary sense; occasionally applied by way of deference to magistrates; and sometimes as a superlative: - angels, X exceeding, God (gods) (-dess, -ly), X (very) great, judges and mighty.

If they were the sons of Elohim and not the sons of Jehovah then they were ordinary human beings.

Lets try this again. what does this mean בְנֵי-הָאֱלֹהִים ps.