Recent content by Dino246

That argument is nonsensical. Actually, Garee did not deny healing in Christ's atonement. However, in keeping with the pattern of your responses to others, you are quick to decry anyone who doesn't immediately and wholeheartedly agree with your view.

You are conflating issues, muddying the waters, and misrepresenting the word of God. The context of the verse you quoted is that Paul was warning Timothy about the danger of empty, godless chatter. Hymenaeus and Philetus were examples of those who engaged in it. By making their comments the...

I'm not debating historicism with you. I'm debating your implication that he translated Revelation incorrectly because he held to a historicist view.

Plus... where are the MAGA hats?

He translated Revelation into English. He interpreted Revelation to be historicist. One may interpret Revelation according to any of the four models and still translate it correctly. Translation is (primarily) a matter of know both languages reasonably well. Interpretation does sometimes...

There are definitely more than ten people in attendance. Aren't they aware of the danger? ;)

Regarding the bolded sentence, that is flawed reasoning. It does not follow that because Wycliffe misinterpreted history that he necessarily misinterpreted Scripture when translating it.

Congratulations! You used a dictionary! Now you can apply your newfound understanding.

You don't seem to understand the word, "relevant". So much of what you post is not relevant to the topic at hand, and certainly not relevant to the posts to which you respond. This post of yours is a perfect example. You took off in four different directions, none of which has anything to do...

You also asked about the large army and the killing of 1/3 of mankind.

More insults. I leave you to your self-indulgence.

Mine was a simple question not asked in reference to 'locusts'. Have you read the book?

Fair enough. Do you accept that there is a significant and important distinction between the two groups?

Garee, you don't understand "relevant" either.

... and has nothing to do with our discussion. I called you out on your bad attitude. You and I have not been discussing the content of her views, but one statement which you badly misread.