Bill Hicks is Alex Jones

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
C

claysmithr

Guest
#1

He's a controlled opposition gatekeeper, there is just too much evidence to deny this.
 

maxwel

Senior Member
Apr 18, 2013
9,526
2,608
113
#7
Except... umm... .Bill Hicks was like... ummm... really smart and eloquent.

And whenever someone in a crazy video says "irrefutable evidence", they generally follow that with pure presupposition.

...
 
C

claysmithr

Guest
#8
Except... umm... .Bill Hicks was like... ummm... really smart and eloquent.

And whenever someone in a crazy video says "irrefutable evidence", they generally follow that with pure presupposition.

...
Alex Jones is smart too, he's just playing a character, as per his lawyer in his divorce
 
C

claysmithr

Guest
#9
Do these two believe in a flat earth?
Um sorry please keep flat earth stuff off this thread. It's actually a common psyop to derail any meaningful discussion.
 
C

claysmithr

Guest
#10
I'm really confused, why is this of any import??
because it means alex jones is a gatekeeper poisoning the well of conspiracy information on the web, when you control both sides of the argument you can keep the conversation only on "approved" topics.

AJ job is to only show "approved truth" and make conspiracy theorists look idiotic
 

maxwel

Senior Member
Apr 18, 2013
9,526
2,608
113
#11
Alex Jones is smart too, he's just playing a character, as per his lawyer in his divorce

I've honestly never heard Jones say anything that sounded very intelligent or articulate, and Hicks was a very articulate man.

And... the video you posted keeps claiming "irrefutable evidence", and then it presents evidence that is so entirely refutable that it's silly.



I highly recommend you present us with a better conspiracy theory... for entertainment value, they should either be interesting or funny.

...
 

tourist

Senior Member
Mar 13, 2014
42,543
17,018
113
69
Tennessee
#12
Um sorry please keep flat earth stuff off this thread. It's actually a common psyop to derail any meaningful discussion.
Based on the OP I don't believe that meaningful discussion is possible. Personally, I don't see the importance of the topic about 2 whack jobs.
 

tourist

Senior Member
Mar 13, 2014
42,543
17,018
113
69
Tennessee
#13
because it means alex jones is a gatekeeper poisoning the well of conspiracy information on the web, when you control both sides of the argument you can keep the conversation only on "approved" topics.

AJ job is to only show "approved truth" and make conspiracy theorists look idiotic
How can this guy possibly be the gatekeeper of anything poisonous or otherwise.
 

gb9

Senior Member
Jan 18, 2011
12,277
6,653
113
#14
How can this guy possibly be the gatekeeper of anything poisonous or otherwise.
this is how this works-

alex jones and inforwars exposes things that most media won't touch.

but, there is a group, similar to the flat earth crowd, that firmly believe in a secret Zionist cabal in Israel that " decide " what is going to happen in the world. mass shootings, wars, economies going up and down, etc..

well, alex and his crew do not by into this ( because it is unprovable ), and report things that easily resecarchable that most media ignores.

the Zionist obsessed crowd hates this, and calls him a gatekeeper for this reason.
 
Mar 21, 2019
487
163
43
#15
He's a controlled opposition gatekeeper, there is just too much evidence to deny this.
I agree. For example, Saudis doing 911. Lol. It's obvious to anyone with half a brain that 911 was an inside job, but why blame a country half-way across the sea, when there were demonstrably culpable people in the US government.

Same with this deal about him getting sued for telling the truth about the Sandy Hoax shooting. I wouldn't be surprised to learn the court case etc. was some sort of charade, to turn the heat up on people legitimately speaking the truth.
 

gb9

Senior Member
Jan 18, 2011
12,277
6,653
113
#16
I agree. For example, Saudis doing 911. Lol. It's obvious to anyone with half a brain that 911 was an inside job, but why blame a country half-way across the sea, when there were demonstrably culpable people in the US government.

Same with this deal about him getting sued for telling the truth about the Sandy Hoax shooting. I wouldn't be surprised to learn the court case etc. was some sort of charade, to turn the heat up on people legitimately speaking the truth.
I have heard alex say 500 times " 911 was an inside job".

and, I think that he is saying sandy hook happened because he is being sued, as would most of us if we thought we about to lose everything we had, and hurt our kids.

the court system in this country works like this- it is not about what is true, it is about what you can prove, while we know there are dozens of " questions" about sandy hook, they can' be proved.

when you are own video , saying " it was staged ' that can be proved, and if you do not retract, the judge will say " guilty ".
 
Mar 21, 2019
487
163
43
#17
I have heard alex say 500 times " 911 was an inside job".
But he lays the blame at the feet of the Saudi government? How could you be so right about the crime, but so wrong about the perpetrator? I smell a rat.

the court system in this country works like this- it is not about what is true, it is about what you can prove, while we know there are dozens of " questions" about sandy hook, they can' be proved.

when you are own video , saying " it was staged ' that can be proved, and if you do not retract, the judge will say " guilty ".
I thought it was about what is true. For example, if Alex Jones indicated that Sandy Hook was faked on video, wouldn't someone have to demonstrate it was not faked, before a judge would rule guilty?

I would have thought a legitimate media agency would be asking the accusers to demonstrate their proof that it was real, rather than just backing down. But I accept this might be unfair, given the specifics of the legal situation.
 

cobalt1959

Active member
Feb 10, 2019
253
124
43
65
#18
Um sorry please keep flat earth stuff off this thread. It's actually a common psyop to derail any meaningful discussion.
No, it isn't. Conspiracy theories are like cancer. If you buy into one or two, suddenly you're buying into all of them. And the king of stupid conspiracy theories is the "Flat Earth" conspiracy. So when someone proposes another dumb conspiracy theory, like the subject of this thread, knowing what other conspiracies you buy into as well is germane to the conversation, because it is a direct barometer of your credibility.
 
Apr 10, 2019
69
20
8
#19
Based on the OP I don't believe that meaningful discussion is possible. Personally, I don't see the importance of the topic about 2 whack jobs.
then move along? The atheist trolls the Christian youtube channels to belittle the Christians. You are called to be different than the world/non-believers.

that is a fruit of yours. and I see it clearly as day. no condemnation, brother or sister. but I am definitely not going to watch it take seed before me, without at least letting the arborist know.
 
Apr 10, 2019
69
20
8
#20

He's a controlled opposition gatekeeper, there is just too much evidence to deny this.
I do believe he is. the alex jones of the mid-late 90s looks nothing like Bill Hicks. In the early 00s, suddenly, they have the same moles and teeth. lol