Not By Works

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

VCO

Senior Member
Oct 14, 2013
11,995
4,615
113
part 2

B1. Belief, Believe, Believers [Noun] pistis "faith," is translated "belief" in Rom 10:17; 2 Thess 2:13.Its chief significance is a conviction respecting God and His Word and the believer's relationship to Him. See ASSURANCE, FAITH, FIDELITY.

Note: In 1 Cor 9:5 the word translated "believer" (RV), is adelphe, "a sister," so 1 Cor 7:15; Rom 16:1;James 2:15, used, in the spiritual sense, of one connected by the tie of the Christian faith.






C1. Belief, Believe, Believers [Adjective] pistos
(a) in the Active sense means "believing, trusting;"
(b) in the Passive sense, "trusty, faithful, trustworthy." It is translated "believer" in 2 Cor 6:15; "them that believe" in 1 Tim 4:12, RV (AV, "believers"); in 1 Tim 5:16, "if any woman that believeth," lit., "if any believing woman." So in 1 Tim 6:2, "believing masters." In 1 Pet 1:21 the RV, following the most authentic mss., gives the noun form, "are believers in God" (AV, "do believe in God"). In John 20:27 it is translated "believing."

It is best understood with significance C1(a), e.g., in Gal 3:9; Acts 16:1; 2 Cor 6:15; Titus 1:6; it has significance C1(b), e.g., in 1 Thess 5:24; 2 Thess 3:3 (see Notes on Thess. p. 211, and Gal. p. 126, by Hogg and Vine). See FAITHFUL, SURE.

Notes:
(1) The corresponding negative verb is apisteo, 2 Tim 2:13, AV, "believe not" RV, "are faithless," in contrast to the statement "He abideth faithful."

(2) The negative noun apistia, "unbelief," is used twice in Matthew (Matt 13:58; Matt 17:20), three times in Mark (Mark 6:6; Mark 9:24; Mark 16:14), four times in Romans (Rom 3:3; Rom 4:20; Rom 11:20,23); elsewhere in 1 Tim 1:13; Heb 3:12,19.
(3) The adjective apistos is translated "unbelievers" in 1 Cor 6:6; 2 Cor 6:14; in 2 Cor 6:15, RV, "unbeliever" (AV, "infidel"); so in 1 Tim 5:8; "unbelieving" in 1 Cor 7:12-15; 1 Cor 14:22-24; 2 Cor 4:4;Titus 1:15; Rev 21:8; "that believe not" in 1 Cor 10:27. In the Gospels it is translated "faithless" in Matt 17:17; Mark 9:19; Luke 9:41; John 20:27, but in Luke 12:46, RV, "unfaithful," AV, "unbelievers." Once it is translated "incredible," Acts 26:8. See FAITHLESS, INCREDIBLE, UNBELIEVER.

(4) Plerophoreo, in Luke 1:1 (AV, "are most surely believed," lit., "have had full course"), the RV renders "have been fulfilled." See FULFILL, KNOW, PERSUADE, PROOF.





Result 2- Unbeliever
apistos an adjective, is used as a noun, rendered "unbeliever" in 2 Cor 6:15; 1 Tim 5:8, RV; plural in 1 Cor 6:6; 2 Cor 6:14; AV only, Luke 12:46 (RV, "unfaithful"). See BELIEF FAITHLESS, INCREDIBLE.




Result 3- Disbelieve
apisteo "to be unbelieving" (a, negative, pistis, "faith;" cp. apistos, "unbelieving"), is translated "believed not," etc., in the AV (except in 1 Pet 2:7, "be disobedient"); "disbelieve" (or "disbelieved") in the RV, in Mark 16:11,16; Luke 24:11,41; Acts 28:24; "disbelieve" is the best rendering, implying that the unbeliever has had a full opportunity of believing and has rejected it; some mss. have apeitheo, "to be disobedient," in 1 Pet 2:7; Rom 3:3, RV, "were without faith;" 2 Tim 2:13, RV, "are faithless. Cp. apeitheo under DISOBEDIENT. See BELIEVE.


Do you KNOW what to BELIEVE IN CHRIST, means to the true HEBREW believer?
 
Dec 12, 2013
46,515
20,402
113
Its all a word game really.

At the end of the day, works are required no matter how you slice and dice it. Whether you "have to do them" or "you will do them out of love God poured into your heart" the fact remains, somethings gotta change after salvation.
Right there is where you miss the mark....the word must.......eternal salvation is given by grace through faith before 1 work is ever done....and the view "must" denies numerous applications of the bible.....such as...

A. First and foremost....ALL who have been genuinely born again have already done the WORKS of the FATHER in BELIEVING

B. believers will have works of EVERY FLAVOR, some good, some bad, some like 1st Corinthians 3...gold, silver and precious stones, some wood, hay and stubble....The latter being burnt to a crisp with nothing left, yet saved so as by fire

C. Some may have 1 work some may have a plethora of works

D. Some, like the thief on the cross was saved without one work done

E. Some may produce and then in their latter years quit producing

F. Some may produce little if anything due to immaturity and or stunted growth

G. Some may take their whole life to produce 1 piece of fruit/work

Paul was clear...a man is justified before God by faith without works/deeds of the law.......!!!!
 

TruthTalk

Senior Member
Jul 17, 2017
2,904
2,262
113
Its all a word game really.

At the end of the day, works are required no matter how you slice and dice it. (Yes it is called our practical sanctification). Whether you "have to do them" or "you will do them out of love God poured into your heart" the fact remains, somethings gotta change after salvation.
Hi Hevosmies, it is much more than a word game, if we are using words to communicate God's plan of salvation for the human race. God set His plan of salvation in motion after the fall of Adam and Eve in the Garden of Eden. Adam and Eve "did nothing" to provide a covering for their sin; Gen3:21

Our God did everything to ensure that their was a covering for both Adam and Eve and there were no works involved on their part, none. Our works are evidence of salvation not the cause of, nor are works used to maintain our eternal salvation. "For God so loved the world that 'He gave His One and Only Son', that whoever 'believes in Him' shall not perish but have eternal life." John3:16

God has provided a covering for the sin of Adam and Even back then and today He has provided forgiveness of our sin by "grace through faith in His Son Jesus Christ, "Not By Works", it is a gift of God, lest anyone should boast." Eph2:8

Eternal Salvation was possible for Adam and Eve without works, in the Garden of Eden; "the Lord God provided a sacrifice, Genesis3:21; and the Lord God provides Eternal Salvation today through the blood atonement of His Son Jesus Christ.

Romans3:25
God presented Christ as a sacrifice of atonement, through the shedding of his blood--to be received by faith. He did this to demonstrate his righteousness, because in his forbearance he had left the sins committed beforehand unpunished--

Today God's covenant with mankind continues and it is our God who provides the sacrifice His, "One and Only Son, Jesus Christ." John3:16, for the remission of sin.

1) God made the garments of skin - Adam and Eve did no work that is pretty plainly revealed
2) God "clothed them"


Genesis3:21,22: The Expulsion from Paradise
21) And 'the LORD God' made garments of skin for Adam and his wife 'and clothed them."
22) Then the LORD God said, “Behold, the man has become like one of Us, knowing good and evil. And now, lest he reach out his hand and take also from the tree of life, and eat, and live forever...”

If you are trying to work for your salvation the Apostle Paul say's "you have fallen from grace."

Your "Practical Sanctification" ((our daily walk)), is for a different topic.

Galatians5:4
You who are trying to be justified by the law have been alienated from Christ; you have fallen away from grace.
 
Dec 12, 2013
46,515
20,402
113
I've ALWAYS quoted scripture.
I said I'm a bible thumper.

@mailmandan posted more of the ECFs than I have in 3 years !
Yep.....usually while ignoring context, verb tense and other scripture in context that totally contradicts a working for salvation that can be lost and that must be kept by what we do.....

You know.....Satan quoted scripture at the temptation of Christ.......and his false messengers quote millions of scriptures every Saturday, Sunday and Wednesday in so called churches world wide every week.......!

That does not make them right....nor does it make you right Fran!
 

stonesoffire

Poetic Member
Nov 24, 2013
10,665
1,829
113
Agreed

The problem seems to begin when we move on to sanctification...


I agree with all.
You call our position in Christ what I call justification.
You call our practice in Christ what I call sanctification.

Also, we should keep in mind always that when Paul speaks of "works" or "law" he's speaking about the law of Moses, or the civil and ceremonial laws that they followed. These are works.

Works are also something that is done to try to achieve a relationship with God but having no faith.
These works are of no value.

The works I'm speaking of, or good deeds, are those that come after salvation and which would be what you call our practice in Christ and what I call sanctification (which is what it's called BTW).

I just don't understand why there is so much refusal to works or good deeds after salvation.
We should all be agreed on this...and I believe most on this thread do agree with it.
The blood is eternally applied and we have been born again by INCORRUPTIBLE SEED.....get that through your head Fran...WE MUST HAVE is one of the most ignorant statements I have seen when it comes to the applocation of the blood!!
It's not a silly question. For those who say that we are saved by obedience or that our obedience maintains our salvation, there must be an answer to, "how much obedience does it take?" Otherwise, you spend your life hoping and wondering if you were "obedient enough" to be saved and that takes us into salvation by works. How much faith does it take to be saved? It's not about how much, but what is the OBJECT of our faith. Either we are trusting 100% in Jesus Christ as the ALL-sufficient means of our salvation or else we are 100% lost. It's not trust in Jesus 50% and 50% in works or trust in Jesus 90% and 10% in works etc..

You said, "To REMAIN saved, we do have to obey God." Obedience is works. So how much obedience does it take?

Amen! :)

It's not about we must do good works in order to become or remain saved but that we will do good works (some more than others) if we truly are saved.

Are you saying that it's faith + the behavior that saves by stressing, "not the acts ALONE?"

James 2:17 We need both faith and works AFTER SALVATION.
In James 2:14, we read of one who says/claims he has faith but has no resulting evidential works (to validate his claim). That is not genuine faith, but a bare profession of faith. So when James asks, "Can that faith save him?" he is saying nothing against genuine faith, but only against an empty profession of faith/dead faith. *So James does not teach that we are saved "by" works. His concern is to show the reality of the faith professed by the individual (James 2:18) and demonstrate that the faith claimed (James 2:14) by the individual is genuine. Simple!

In James 2:20, "faith without works is dead" does not mean that faith is dead until it produces works and then it becomes a living faith or that works are the source of life in faith or that we are saved by works. James is simply saying faith that is not accompanied by evidential works is dead. Again, if someone says-claims he has faith but lacks resulting evidential works, then he has an empty profession of faith/dead faith and not authentic faith.

I'm not suggesting that Jesus left us with His commands merely as a suggestion. These are commands that He expects us to strive to obey, but none of us perfectly obey Him, yet John did say that those who are born of God practice righteousness and not sin and also love their brother. Some believers get off to a slow start, yet Paul still refers to them as "babes in Christ." (1 Corinthians 3:1-3)

In John 3:18, Jesus said - “He who believes in Him is not condemned; but he who does not believe is condemned already, because he has not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God." In Acts 10:43, Peter said - "Of Him all the prophets bear witness that through His name everyone who believes in Him receives forgiveness of sins." In Acts 16:31, Paul said - “Believe in the Lord Jesus, and you will be saved, you and your household.” *Notice believes in Him "apart from additions or modifications."

Where people into trouble is when they re-define faith to "include" works, like the Roman Catholic I mentioned in post #80,253. It sounds to me like you are leaning in the same direction as he is in regards to faith, even though you said we are saved by faith alone. Please correct me if I'm wrong.

Amen! :) I've had discussions with people before on Christian Chat and other Christian forums who claimed to be perfect.

I think I know, but we'll see how it turns out. ;)[/QUOTE]
Hey SoF,
I was waiting for @dcontroversal to answer your questions since you asked him,,,but since he didn't, I will. One answer does not a derail make...

I won't speak to the gap theory because I don't believe this is the case. It would mean that God made a mistake and He's trying to fix it. I believe Genesis 2 is concentrating on the creation of man. There's a problem with the creation of vegetation, but it's accepted that Genesis was not written by the same person so whoever wrote chapter two is just concentrating on a different important aspect.

There's is nothing that says that A and E did NOT eat of the tree of Life. However, in scripture we have to go by what IS stated, and not by what is not stated. You can't prove a negative. IOW, scripture also says that babies were NOT baptized...so it works the same. If it's the same for baptism, it's the same for the Tree of Life. It's generally accepted theology that A and E did NOT eat from the Tree of Life.
This is shown by Genesis 3:22. " Lest they take ALSO from the Tree of Life"...this means it would have been for the first time.

Yes. You're right. We were sons in the beginning and God wants us to be sons again.
Jesus is the firstborn of many. As in Adam we fell, in Jesus we rise.

We will not, however, regain what we had before the fall of Adam. A and E had preternatural gifts which they gave up and which WE cannot have because of the sin nature. One of these gifts is immortality...now we die. Well-being...now we get sick. Etc.
That's just your assumption Gods grace concerning Genesis 3:22. I see that as them knowing what the tree of life did for them,

We will never come to the same conclusions. The reasons being that I see God as the beginning, the power of Holy Spirit working, and finishing what He has started in our lives. It's a promise! We obey by believing and receiving His Word as the ultimate truth. For in the Spirit...faith is power. Supernatural power freeing men to participate with Holy Spirit.

Good deeds even godless men and women can do. But the works of God? Only through Holy Spirit.
 

stonesoffire

Poetic Member
Nov 24, 2013
10,665
1,829
113
Lol...I forgot that my iPad posts more than I intend. It seems to have a mind of its own. That post was just for Gods grace.
 

VCO

Senior Member
Oct 14, 2013
11,995
4,615
113

mailmandan

Senior Member
Apr 7, 2014
25,475
13,419
113
58
@mailmandan posted more of the ECFs than I have in 3 years !
Yet I quoted the ECF's to show why I don't put much stock in the writings of the ECF's and also to explain how Roman Catholics quote the ECF's to defend their false teachings, such as baptismal regeneration, infant baptism and transubstantiation.
 
Dec 12, 2013
46,515
20,402
113
Why is it so hard to understand that James is making a comparison between a mere belief in God and genuine faith while making it very clear that the audience is MEN and not GOD......JAMES DOES NOT TEACH a works based SALVATION.....AND TO THIS VERY DAY THE SAME AUDIENCE he addressed "JEWS" BELIEVE IN GOD, but do not possess SAVING FAITH.....!!!
 

gb9

Senior Member
Jan 18, 2011
12,315
6,688
113
Why is it so hard to understand that James is making a comparison between a mere belief in God and genuine faith while making it very clear that the audience is MEN and not GOD......JAMES DOES NOT TEACH a works based SALVATION.....AND TO THIS VERY DAY THE SAME AUDIENCE he addressed "JEWS" BELIEVE IN GOD, but do not possess SAVING FAITH.....!!!
things are hard to understand for those who do not want to understand................
 

VCO

Senior Member
Oct 14, 2013
11,995
4,615
113
Why is it so hard to understand that James is making a comparison between a mere belief in God and genuine faith while making it very clear that the audience is MEN and not GOD......JAMES DOES NOT TEACH a works based SALVATION.....AND TO THIS VERY DAY THE SAME AUDIENCE he addressed "JEWS" BELIEVE IN GOD, but do not possess SAVING FAITH.....!!!

I think they are sending them in, a FEW at time, so that we Have To Repeat the same Posts, OVER and OVER, and OVER.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
OK Bill, in the order asked:

1. To be saved all that is required if faith.
Paul. Having begun in the spirit

[/quote]To REMAIN saved, we do have to obey God.[/quote]
Are you now being perfected in the flesh.

Before Paul spoke these words. He called the galtions, who were believeing the same thing, fools.

Jesus said that if we love Him we will obey Him.
If we don't obey it means we don't love....
If we don't love God, are we saved? I don't believe so but only God knows for sure.
John 14:15

2. I guess everyone must do something different. I think what we must do is let our light shine on the world so that they could see the love of God in us. Maybe it's being a good mother/father; maybe it's being useful at our job...Paul said to do all t hings as if we're doing them for God...so I would say everything we do we do for God.
Colossians 3:23

3. No. Not by itself. Faith saves us. ONLY obedience is working under the Law. We are no longer under the Law --- and anyway, faith saved in the O.T. too.

4. Faith.
We love BECAUSE he loved us first. The bible says the children of God OBEY HIM (thats how we know they are children of God)
Abraham justified (verified or proved) his faith by following through with his faith which occured 35 years learlier, When God promised a child from him and his wife would be his err, and become a great nation, when as hebrews said, Knowing God could raise him from the dead, went to offer his son of promise and God stopped him, His faith was made more mature, or stronger because of this as james said.

God knows a persons heart. Man does not. You may beed proof you are saved by how well you obey or othe rpeople may need that proof. But God does not. He is not going to save people he KNOWS do not really trust him
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
So you're saying that we ARE to do good works and deeds (after salvation) or we end up at the GWTJ ??

Yes. I agree.
Jesus said so...
John 5:28-29
No. Like most people. We KNOW we are going to do Good works. Because that is what scripture teaches.
Those who end up at GWTJ end up there because they never had faith. Many of them had works (jesus will say depart for he never knew them)

You want to offer God your filthy rags (works), feel free. But please do not be offended by those who offer God their faith. Because they know an understand no matter how much work they do. They will still fall short.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
What's wrong with the word MUST?
!
Must assumes you can not do it, or will nto do it.

The bible says will.

The only reason to say must is you do not believe God, wh began a good will. WILL COMPLETE THAT WORK. It trusts in self and our ability, and not God and his power.

How can you claim to have faiht in God. When you do not have faith he will (not might) complete the work he PROMISED to do.

Faith meand assurance, not mere belief. If you have faith, your faith WILL work. And the more you work. The more your faith is grown.

Belief may or may not do some works. But has no assurance.

You have no assurance. So how can you claim to have faith?
 

Hevosmies

Well-known member
Sep 8, 2018
3,612
2,633
113
Must assumes you can not do it, or will nto do it.

The bible says will.

The only reason to say must is you do not believe God, wh began a good will. WILL COMPLETE THAT WORK. It trusts in self and our ability, and not God and his power.

How can you claim to have faiht in God. When you do not have faith he will (not might) complete the work he PROMISED to do.

Faith meand assurance, not mere belief. If you have faith, your faith WILL work. And the more you work. The more your faith is grown.

Belief may or may not do some works. But has no assurance.

You have no assurance. So how can you claim to have faith?
Well put!

I have to start using "WILL" isntead of "MUST" as well.
This convinces me. Sorry for using it guys!

Thanks!
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
Well, here's my definition...
What's yours?

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Vine's Greek New Testment Dictionary

3 results found for BELIEVE Showing 1 through 3

Click any letter to display an alphabetized index of Biblical terms:
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z
Result 1- Belief, Believe, Believers
A. Verbs
  1. pisteuo
  2. peitho
B. Noun
  1. pistis
C. Adjective
  1. pistos


A1. Belief, Believe, Believers [Verb] pisteuo "to believe," also "to be persuaded of," and hence, "to place confidence in, to trust," signifies, in this sense of the word, reliance upon, not mere credence. It is most frequent in the writings of the Apostle John, especially the Gospel. He does not use the noun (see below). For the Lord's first use of the verb, see John 1:50. Of the writers of the Gospels, Matthew uses the verb ten times, Mark ten, Luke nine, John ninety-nine. In Acts 5:14 the present participle of the verb is translated "believers." See COMMIT, INTRUST, TRUST.






A2. Belief, Believe, Believers [Verb] peitho "to persuade," in the Middle and Passive Voices signifies "to suffer oneself to be persuaded," e.g., Luke 16:31; Heb 13:18; it is sometimes translated "believe" in the RV, but not in Acts 17:4, RV, "were persuaded," and Acts 27:11, "gave (more) heed;" in Acts 28:24, "believed." See AGREE, ASSURE, OBEY, PERSUADE, TRUST, YIELD.

Note: For apisteo, the negative of pisteuo, and apeitheo, the negative of peitho, see DISBELIEVE, DISOBEDIENT.






part 1
So why do you not have these bolded words in your form of “belief? Why are you not persuaded, Why are you not trusting, Why are you not relying upon the focus of your what you claim your faith is in, (God and his promises) and instead are relying on your ability to do what you think must be accomplished?

Faith also has with it the form of assurance (unlike the word belief, which one can believe yet have no assurance) What is it that God has not done that you have no assurance in his promises and must rely on your ability to be obedient?