Why is praying in tongues necessary?

Garee, I've asked you this before several times, and you have not given a straight answer: how does your view make sense in light of the events of Acts 10, where Cornelius and the others spoke in tongues by the Holy Spirit, and there were no unbelieving Jews present?

Since you have been unable or unwilling to provide a straight answer, I'll provide one: it doesn't. So you need to reconsider whether your view and modify it so that it is consistent with all Scripture.

Tongues (a personal prayer language) is typically the gateway to the other manifestation gifts. It confirms the baptism with the Holy Spirit.

What do you mean by new prophecy?

Why is stirring the pot necessary? Are you ever learning and never able to come unto the knowledge of the truth?

In Scripture, I only see one gift of Tongues with Interpretation(I cor 14). Where do you see each of those, so I can check the context of each?

That is known as Missionary Tongues, I have experienced that twice myself while in the Airforce. But, it does not prove that Roman 8 is referring to the Holy Spirit praying in tongues through a person. Communicating to a person in their language is not the same as praying with "through wordless groans" a "wordless groans" is not a human language.

To my knowledge there is no proof text for Missionary Tongues otherwise Pentecostal Missionary Schools would find people who have that ability to get them out on the mission fields.

For those unaware of what Missionary Tongues is. In both cases I was speaking with Muslims from Iran in their native language. To an observer it was noting more than a conversation in a foreign language., I was thinking in Hebrew at the time and speaking Arabic. In both cases they became Christians and were killed when they went home to Iran. This was under the Carter reign as President.

In a related story on why not to depend on Missionary Tongues.

"
January 6, 2019January 23, 2017by Charles A. Sullivan
A pioneer missionary of the Azusa Street Revival in the early 1900s explains why his conferred supernatural gift of the Bengali language did not work upon arrival.
Surely, such a condition would threaten one’s theological opinions but not Mr. Garr’s. He believed that the gift had switched to another language while in voyage and Bengali never reappeared. He then side-stepped the issue and focused on other miraculous demonstrations.
This case is one of the earliest documented examples of the tongues crisis facing Azusa missionaries. Many traveled the world thinking they were endowed with a certain foreign language and upon arrival, did not. The resolution of this theological crisis became a foremost problem to solve.
The Pentecostal movement had a number of choices to address the issue, admit they were wrong, redefine, or ignore. Garr chose the third option, ignoring the theological crisis by giving a weak apologetic.
A high number of Pentecostals and Charismatics are surprised that such a crisis existed and remain skeptical about the above thesis. They want to see proof. So, the actual letter from Alfred Garr to a periodical named Confidence is digitized and presented below, untouched from the original on this very subject.
"https://charlesasullivan.com/8601/missionary-crisis-speaking-tongues/

I was in NAM and no one heard them speaking our language in the Jungle.

Discernment, Wisdom and Teaching so I am told

OK friend you still sound like you are on another planet.

Confused, is what one says while speaking in tongues considered to be scripture?

1 Corinthians 12:27-31 Easy-to-Read Version (ERV)
27 All of you together are the body of Christ. Each one of you is a part of that body. 28 And in the church God has given a place first to apostles, second to prophets, and third to teachers. Then God has given a place to those who do miracles, those who have gifts of healing, those who can help others, those who are able to lead, and those who can speak in different kinds of languages. 29 Not all are apostles. Not all are prophets. Not all are teachers. Not all do miracles. 30 Not all have gifts of healing. Not all speak in different kinds of languages. Not all interpret those languages. 31 Continue to give your attention to the spiritual gifts you consider to be the greatest. But now I want to point out a way of life that is even greater.

I forgot that text, it shows that tongues are know human languages.

What is Gare's view since it does not make sense to me at all?

Garee's writing is often hard to decrypt. The short answer is that he is a cessationist.

The law in respect to the tongues doctrine shows or confirms a person does not believe prophecy .The sign that shows someone does believe is that they are believers .The invisible confirmation of faith the amen.

The green and the purple in my last post should help keep the two separate confirming the difference..
In order for it to makes any spiritual sense a person must "mix faith" in what they do hear or see. ( No outward sign gifts). Signs follow prophecy .Prophecy is the gift of tongues.... God speaking in all the languages of the nations. Not in the respect of the flesh of one nation .That will not believe prophecy used as an example of unbelief, no faith in a God not seen..

Huh

These things are easier to understand from an experiential perspective, But...
The "gift" of tongues (prophetic prayer language) that you are referring to is #3 in the list below.
The personal prayer language (#1) would be what was received in Samaria, Ephesus and at the house of Cornelius.
Intercessory prayer language (#2) would be using your personal prayer language to intercede for others. (Rom.8:26-27)
Singing in the Spirit (#4) is from ! Cor.14:15.
The Evangelistic language (#5) you are familiar with from Acts chapter two.

Five Different kinds of tongues
1) Personal prayer language - Speaking to/with God
2) Intercessory prayer language - Praying for others in the Spirit
3) Prophetic prayer language - Addressing the whole church/preferably with interpretation
4) Singing in the Spirit - Singing in tongues/worship activity
5) Evangelistic language - Speaking the message of God to a people in their own language (not yours)

IMO, a little discernment and wisdom might have been helpful before starting yet another contentious thread on the same subject that is everyone's favorite argument around here

I guess folks like to argue about tongues cause everyone has one

good point on the other gifts

ain't nobody gonna bring that up with success

but everyone has the gift of teaching, right?

small print: if you do not know me or where I stand on these things, kindly do not assume