Who is voting for Trump again?

their were many red flags with the people who carried out tragic mass shootings that have occurred in the last couple of years, yet they were all ignored, or unacted on by the " government experts "

oh

well

I wasn't referring to his character

I had the ridiculous jumping on a story up in Canada, that fuels the engine of the gibbering leftist media in mind rather than T personally

otherwise, Canada could just drift off into the Arctic Ocean as far as the news down here is concerned

well that and blaming Canada for 'Arctic Air'

Trudeau is a ridiculous pouty child IMO...that's my take on his person as opposed to the reaction of the 'preachy' news theatre down here that passes for journalism

uh huh

don't hold your breath for when they are going to apologize for all the lies they told about Trump though

oh no. don't do that

we need to think up a new word meaning beyond hypocrisy to the 9th degree

perhaps hyper hypocrisy? or is that too expected ?

To paraphrase you: And who said He was?

I am well aware of that fact. And, it still does not change the fact that you think the president should be able to say whatever he wants whenever he wants to whomever he wants. If the Trumpster had a little more control over his tongue enough to keep his mouth out of the dumpster he might garner a little more support. And maybe even respect.

Individuals make up those parties.

Who said He was?

That looks like not only a false accusation but a false dilemma.

YOU said he wasn't being "Biblical". I pointed out NO ONE is going to be Biblical in office UNTIL Jesus reigns.

Garnering support has ZERO to do with the President being able to say whatever he wants to a foreign leader. We were discussing whether it was legal or unconstitutional.

The people IN THE PARTY run on what is in the party platform. Whether they uphold that platform once in office is another matter. Trump CERTAINLY has on the life of unborn children. Do I have to chronicle to you how he has?

The GOP platform is pro-life.

The Democrat platform is anti-life.
Those are the FACTS. FACTS are rough. I get that. So tell me what false accusation I made?

Nice try. No you weren't.

But thanks for not being able to retort the FACTS.

Nobody is responsible for another person's sin.

The one who sins is the one who will die. The child will not share the guilt of the parent, nor will the parent share the guilt of the child. The righteousness of the righteous will be credited to them, and the wickedness of the wicked will be charged against them. Ezekiel 18:20

If you vote for a Democrat, knowing they will restore federal foreign funding to counsel women, and aid them in getting abortions, and tear down through judicial appointment and legislation even the scantest protection for the baby, THEN YOU ARE COMPLICIT IN THE BABY'S death.

Down here the libs like the word phobia, so it must be a phobic based word like epistemophobia or gnosiophobia.

NOT EVEN SLIGHTLY.

THAT, BTW, has been YOUR tactic here all along.

did I miss where the US became a theocracy?

Since you added to what you originally said, you moved them. But you would rather call me a liar.

My tactic here all along? Jeepers, Ed, get a grip.

I added NOTHING. and as for your second point....

What you said the first time:
Is quite different from what you said the second time:
The facts speak for themselves here. Even being "complicit" and being "responsible for" are two different things.

Pot, meet kettle.

Say, has the GOP banned abortion yet?

Ouch, looks like they’re allowing abortions left and right EVEN though they claim to have a prolife platform.

Well, if the shoe fits...lol

hypocraphobiadistortiumadinfinitum

hypocra-phobia-distortium-ad-infinitum

almost as good as that big word from Mary Poppins