Catholic vs Protestant Debate.

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

graceNpeace

Senior Member
Aug 12, 2016
2,180
107
63
We do know who all the popes were back to Peter:
Peter (32-67)
Linus (67-76)
Anacletus (76-88)
Clement I (88-97)
Evaristus (97-105), and the entire list is here CATHOLIC ENCYCLOPEDIA: List of Popes
Seriously...LOL

You are NOT going to get a lot of love here with silly claims like this.
The RCC did not exist for centuries later than Peter.

The RCC could not even have nominally existed prior to 1054, despite the wild claims of the patriarch of Rome (one of the issues that led to the great schism).
Before this there was just the church, an imperfect one full of problems to be sure.
After 1054, yes, the church in Rome and what became the Orthodox church separated further to become very different entities.
t
There is no unbroken line of Apostolic succession from Peter through to the current Pope. Just a fiction, worthy of a Dan Brown novel!

And you know of course that the term "Pope" is derived from the word "Papa" and was coined by people in the eastern churches (those that would later become the Orthodox Church) as a term of endearment in the days when the Patriarch of Rome was actually instrumental in doing something useful, like settle doctrinal debates amongst various eastern congregations.
The current definition of "Pope" and titles of the Pope is another fiction without Biblical foundation.
(If there is no such thing as Apostolic succession, and there is not, then none of the current claims stack up.)

I think you need to understand that the version of history (and theology) taught by the RCC is really just a Dan Brown novel - a creative mix of just a little bit of truth here and there mixed in with a lot of imagination!
 
Mar 4, 2018
17
0
0
Well, there's a lot of issues brought up here. I'll be going through and trying to take topics one at a time.

The main point for me being Catholic though are that Jesus started one Church and it has continued to this day, and from historical evidence, I believe that is the Catholic Church.

I hope to have many more hours of conversation here.

Thanks for the dialogue and God bless.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
Well, there's a lot of issues brought up here. I'll be going through and trying to take topics one at a time.

The main point for me being Catholic though are that Jesus started one Church and it has continued to this day, and from historical evidence, I believe that is the Catholic Church.

I hope to have many more hours of conversation here.

Thanks for the dialogue and God bless.
Don't trust history. Trust the bible (I know your church tells you not to trust the bible but them, that should be your first clue)

Ask yourself. Does the catholic church (as you see it today) resemble anything about the churches in acts? Or any of the other churches.

You will find the answer to be no. Now ask why
 
Mar 4, 2018
17
0
0
Where do you get the idea that the Catholic Church tells me not to trust the Bible? The cannon of the Bible was decided by the Catholic Church after all. I have listened to many Catholic Bible studies. The Bible is read at every mass.
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
Where do you get the idea that the Catholic Church tells me not to trust the Bible? The cannon of the Bible was decided by the Catholic Church after all. I have listened to many Catholic Bible studies. The Bible is read at every mass.
Is the bible your final authority?

 

wolfwint

Senior Member
Feb 15, 2014
3,590
879
113
61
Just joined the site and thought I'd post here.

Basics are that the Catholic Church is the original Church founded by Jesus. History shows this, as we can trace all popes back to Peter, for one example.

Also, it was the Catholic Church (only church at the time), that decided what books belonged in the Bible.
Then you should still believe that you are pleasing God in worship ideols and Mary.
But dont tell that catholic church teaching is that what God wants. My relatives are catholic and my mother was.
You cant tell me anything good about this false believe.
 

Katy-follower

Senior Member
Jun 25, 2011
2,719
155
63
Interesting the church is indeed catholic in the proper use of the word. Catholic as universal describes the Christian church. It is universal in that every believer is part of the church without respect to tribe or tongue. Every born again blood bought believer who is baptized by the Holy Spirit unto new life in Christ is part of the church that Christ birthed.

The Roman catholic church is not universal nor is it Christian but papal. It has for centuries excluded all others who were not water baptized into the Roman catholic church.

For the cause of Christ
Roger
There was a bishop, Tony Palmer, who was ecumenical, and he kept using that universal line as a way to get all the churches to unite with Rome. Quite deceptive. He kept saying "if you're born again then you're catholic" :eek:
 
Mar 4, 2018
17
0
0
My authority is the Bible plus the Traditions of the Church. We need to follow all of God's word, as St Paul says in 2 Thes:

15 [FONT=&quot]Therefore, brethren, stand fast, and hold the traditions which ye have been taught, whether by word, or our epistle.


[/FONT]
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
My authority is the Bible plus the Traditions of the Church. We need to follow all of God's word, as St Paul says in 2 Thes:

15 Therefore, brethren, stand fast, and hold the traditions which ye have been taught, whether by word, or our epistle.



What if tradition contradicts the bible or vise versa?
 
Mar 4, 2018
17
0
0
That would be a problem, except I beleive that the Holy Spirit guides the Church and keeps it from error in teachings on faith and morals. As Jesus says in Mt 16:18

18 [FONT=&quot]And I say also unto thee, That thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.[/FONT]
 
E

eternally-gratefull

Guest
That would be a problem, except I beleive that the Holy Spirit guides the Church and keeps it from error in teachings on faith and morals. As Jesus says in Mt 16:18

18 And I say also unto thee, That thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.
Thats prety dangerous, WHat if a man in charge wants to change things? God will not force a man to go against his will. oh, And the rock that he built the churhc on was not peter. Different words were used. Peter was called the pebble, or smaller rock, Jesus was the cornerstone of the church not peter.
 

notuptome

Senior Member
May 17, 2013
15,050
2,538
113
That would be a problem, except I beleive that the Holy Spirit guides the Church and keeps it from error in teachings on faith and morals. As Jesus says in Mt 16:18

18 And I say also unto thee, That thou art Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.
More perversion of the scriptures in Roman theology. The church is not built on Peter but on Christ. Peter would be a most faulty foundation upon which to build. Christ is the Rock which cannot be moved. The chief cornerstone which the builders rejected.

For the cause of Christ
Roger
 

mailmandan

Senior Member
Apr 7, 2014
25,047
13,056
113
58
What if tradition contradicts the bible or vise versa?
The concept of tradition is a convenient excuse for the Roman Catholic magisterium to teach whatever they desire and call it the Word of God without any accountability whatsoever. Tradition is the magician’s hat, out of which the Roman Catholic magisterium can pull out any theological rabbit that it wishes and call it the Word of God. :rolleyes:
 

Lucy-Pevensie

Senior Member
Dec 20, 2017
9,265
5,624
113
My authority is the Bible plus the Traditions of the Church. We need to follow all of God's word, as St Paul says in 2 Thes:

15 Therefore, brethren, stand fast, and hold the traditions which ye have been taught, whether by word, or our epistle.


That is the problem to me. The Bible plus anything can lead one astray. The most important thing is to seek what God wants.
Who is he? What is his message? What is important to him?

Israel got into trouble time and again because they worshipped God but then set up something else beside him or in addition to him. Building an alter to "Our God YHVH" is right. Our God YHVH + Our Goddess Ashtoreth = trouble.

Catholicism has a good base, Father, Son and Holy Spirit. They honour Jesus. I know many Catholics believe in and love Jesus. But The RCC sets up others beside Jesus. We must worship God as he has asked us to. We can't have worship of The Lord God alongside the bowing and genuflecting to The Queen of Heaven. It's something God has told us he hates.

This is hard for me. I find it difficult when speaking to Catholics who won't be honest about the religious practices. When you have done these things all your life they seem normal but please consider what God really wants over what tradition teaches.

Jesus taught the Pharisees how he felt regarding the traditions of men if they are exalted too highly. Mark 7

5 So the Pharisees and teachers of the law asked Jesus, “Why don’t your disciples live according to the tradition of the elders instead of eating their food with defiled hands?”
6 He replied, “Isaiah was right when he prophesied about you hypocrites; as it is written:
“‘These people honor me with their lips,
but their hearts are far from me.
7 They worship me in vain;
their teachings are merely human rules.’ [Is 29:13]


8 You have let go of the commands of God and are holding on to human traditions.”
 
Mar 2, 2020
185
18
18
Catholic church had its start in Rome when the pagans of Pergamon decided to move to Rome with all their idolatries and lies.
Pergamon enjoyed centuries of prosperity that continued when it passed peacefully to Rome’s control in 133 B.C. From that point on, Pergamon’s fate was inextricably linked to that of Rome, and it rose and fell in tandem with the great Roman Empire.
https://www.gotquestions.org/origin-Catholic-church.html
catholics are pagans doomed to destruction.
 

mailmandan

Senior Member
Apr 7, 2014
25,047
13,056
113
58
Catholic church had its start in Rome when the pagans of Pergamon decided to move to Rome with all their idolatries and lies.
Pergamon enjoyed centuries of prosperity that continued when it passed peacefully to Rome’s control in 133 B.C. From that point on, Pergamon’s fate was inextricably linked to that of Rome, and it rose and fell in tandem with the great Roman Empire.
https://www.gotquestions.org/origin-Catholic-church.html
catholics are pagans doomed to destruction.
Interesting article. I recently watched a video on the origins of the Catholic church, which describes how pagan customs flowed into the Catholic church.

 
L

Locoponydirtman

Guest
Y'all do know that untill today the latest post in this thread was a year ago.
Randy Travis has a song called "digging up bones". Y'all should give a listen.
 
7

7seasrekeyed

Guest
right

corpses smell

bad

 
7

7seasrekeyed

Guest
Catholic church had its start in Rome when the pagans of Pergamon decided to move to Rome with all their idolatries and lies.
Pergamon enjoyed centuries of prosperity that continued when it passed peacefully to Rome’s control in 133 B.C. From that point on, Pergamon’s fate was inextricably linked to that of Rome, and it rose and fell in tandem with the great Roman Empire.
https://www.gotquestions.org/origin-Catholic-church.html
catholics are pagans doomed to destruction.

why would you kick start this very old thread and end with catholics are pagans doomed to destruction?

that's in very poor taste IMO and you just joined to boot

seems you might have joined to bash Catholics

not a good reason to join a site that is supposed to be for the purpose of discussing Christianity...not bashing others

we are all doomed to destruction without Christ...