God, what's Water Baptism for?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

Nehemiah6

Senior Member
Jul 18, 2017
24,446
12,932
113
#61
I understand "remission" as being temporary.
That is incorrect. Remission of sins is the PERMANENT forgiveness of sins -- the blotting out of sins.

Repent ye therefore, and be converted, that your sins may be blotted out, when the times of refreshing shall come from the presence of the Lord (Acts 3:19)

This corresponds to the words of Christ in Luke 24:47: And that repentance and remission of sins should be preached in his name among all nations, beginning at Jerusalem.
 
Jan 12, 2019
7,497
1,399
113
#62
That is incorrect. Remission of sins is the PERMANENT forgiveness of sins -- the blotting out of sins.

Repent ye therefore, and be converted, that your sins may be blotted out, when the times of refreshing shall come from the presence of the Lord (Acts 3:19)

This corresponds to the words of Christ in Luke 24:47: And that repentance and remission of sins should be preached in his name among all nations, beginning at Jerusalem.
Interesting that you used that verse. Notice that even if Israel repented there and then, their sins are not forgiven immediately, instead it is a "may be".

Their sins will only be forgiven when "the times of refreshing shall come", the word shall implies a future.

How do you understand that verse? What is the "times of refreshing" to you, and when will it come for Israel?
 

Nehemiah6

Senior Member
Jul 18, 2017
24,446
12,932
113
#63
How do you understand that verse? What is the "times of refreshing" to you, and when will it come for Israel?
The answer is found in Romans 11.

ROMANS 11: THE REDEMPTION AND RESTORATION OF ISRAEL BY CHRIST
25 For I would not, brethren, that ye should be ignorant of this mystery, lest ye should be wise in your own conceits; that blindness in part is happened to Israel, until the fulness of the Gentiles be come in.
26 And so all Israel shall be saved: as it is written, There shall come out of Sion the Deliverer, and shall turn away ungodliness from Jacob:
27 For this is my covenant unto them, when I shall take away their sins.
28 As concerning the Gospel, they are enemies for your sakes: but as touching the election, they are beloved for the fathers' sakes.
29 For the gifts and calling of God are without repentance.
30 For as ye in times past have not believed God, yet have now obtained mercy through their unbelief:
31 Even so have these also now not believed, that through your mercy they also may obtain mercy.
32 For God hath concluded them all in unbelief, that he might have mercy upon all.


This does not preclude the remission of sins for both Jews and Gentiles since the day of Pentecost. See Ephesians 2.
 
Jan 12, 2019
7,497
1,399
113
#64
The answer is found in Romans 11.

ROMANS 11: THE REDEMPTION AND RESTORATION OF ISRAEL BY CHRIST
25 For I would not, brethren, that ye should be ignorant of this mystery, lest ye should be wise in your own conceits; that blindness in part is happened to Israel, until the fulness of the Gentiles be come in.
26 And so all Israel shall be saved: as it is written, There shall come out of Sion the Deliverer, and shall turn away ungodliness from Jacob:
27 For this is my covenant unto them, when I shall take away their sins.
28 As concerning the Gospel, they are enemies for your sakes: but as touching the election, they are beloved for the fathers' sakes.
29 For the gifts and calling of God are without repentance.
30 For as ye in times past have not believed God, yet have now obtained mercy through their unbelief:
31 Even so have these also now not believed, that through your mercy they also may obtain mercy.
32 For God hath concluded them all in unbelief, that he might have mercy upon all.


This does not preclude the remission of sins for both Jews and Gentiles since the day of Pentecost. See Ephesians 2.
So, according to what Peter told Israel in Acts 3, when they repented of killing their Messiah and believe him as such, their sins will only be blotted out in the future when their Messiah returns for them.

But what Paul told us in the Body of Christ is that our sins are all forgiven the moment we believe that Jesus died for our sins and rose again. (Romans 4:25).

Can you see a difference in the two?
 

Lafftur

Senior Member
Apr 18, 2017
6,739
3,556
113
#65
That is incorrect. Remission of sins is the PERMANENT forgiveness of sins -- the blotting out of sins.

Repent ye therefore, and be converted, that your sins may be blotted out, when the times of refreshing shall come from the presence of the Lord (Acts 3:19)

This corresponds to the words of Christ in Luke 24:47: And that repentance and remission of sins should be preached in his name among all nations, beginning at Jerusalem.
Oh Nehemiah6, I’m talking about what John the Baptist said about Water Baptism- remission of sins = Temporary.

Go back and try to understand what I posted.

It takes the Blood of Jesus to permanently remove sin.

NOTE: Cancer can go into “remission” but it will probably come back - it’s not definite removal.
 

Lafftur

Senior Member
Apr 18, 2017
6,739
3,556
113
#66
The Gospel is the death, burial, and resurrection of Jesus.

How can you cut out the middle man for water baptism is part of the salvation plan of God.

Jesus said you must be born of water and the Spirit to enter heaven.

Rom 6:3 Know ye not, that so many of us as were baptized into Jesus Christ were baptized into his death?
Rom 6:4 Therefore we are buried with him by baptism into death: that like as Christ was raised up from the dead by the glory of the Father, even so we also should walk in newness of life.
Rom 6:5 For if we have been planted together in the likeness of his death, we shall be also in the likeness of his resurrection.

Rom 6:6 Knowing this, that our old man is crucified with him, that the body of sin might be destroyed, that henceforth we should not serve sin.
Rom 6:7 For he that is dead is freed from sin.
Rom 6:8 Now if we be dead with Christ, we believe that we shall also live with him.

1Pe 3:20 Which sometime were disobedient, when once the longsuffering of God waited in the days of Noah, while the ark was a preparing, wherein few, that is, eight souls were saved by water.
1Pe 3:21 The like figure whereunto even baptism doth also now save us (not the putting away of the filth of the flesh, but the answer of a good conscience toward God,) by the resurrection of Jesus Christ.

The man Christ Jesus died, was buried, and rose again, and then went to heaven and has a glorified body.

We have to identify with the man Christ Jesus by repenting, being water baptized, and receiving the Spirit.

Water Baptism is part of salvation for it is part of the death, burial, and resurrection of Christ, the Gospel.
So, you’re saying.... :unsure:

We need the Blood and Body of Jesus and Water baptism and Holy Spirit baptism are all part of salvation because to enter the Kingdom of God Jesus told Nicodemus:


Nicodemus saith unto him, How can a man be born when he is old? can he enter the second time into his mother's womb, and be born? Jesus answered, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born of water and of the Spirit, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God. That which is born of the flesh is flesh; and that which is born of the Spirit is spirit.
John 3:4-6 - https://www.biblegateway.com/passage?search=John 3:4-6&version=KJV

Very interesting.....I think you might be correct! :love:(y)
 
P

pottersclay

Guest
#67
I am so happy with this thread. The responses are great and very mature.
What I tried to do is bring all the facts to the table along with other saints and then reason.
I think this is one of the few threads that have been successful in doing that.
Although some of us are scratching our heads about this subject as we dig closer and deeper into God's word we find that the truth is revealed by rightly dividing it . Let's continue to practice this kind of study and not embrace every wind of doctrine .
 

mailmandan

Senior Member
Apr 7, 2014
25,043
13,050
113
58
#68
The water baptism was for remission of sins..... repentance was the focus.....or am I wrong?
Is water baptism FOR (in order to obtain) remission of sins or is it FOR (in regards to/on the basis of) remission of sins received upon repentance? (Luke 3:3; 24:47; Acts 3:19) In Matthew 3:11, we read - "I baptize you with water FOR repentance." Now did John baptize with water "in order to obtain" repentance or "in regards to/on the basis of" repentance? Obviously the latter. Baptizing someone "in order to obtain" repentance does not make sense. We "repent first" and are then water baptized "afterwards."
 
P

pottersclay

Guest
#69
This subject is very interesting to me because it's the one thing that Jesus commanded us to do and enabled us to do and have athority to do yet the scriptures never record Jesus baptising anyone.
His reply to John as in why John should baptise him peaks my interest also..."suffer it to be so now"
So if we baptise any one are we carring on John's ministry or Jesus ministry.
Another thing to place before us all is that John the Baptist was known throughout the land for his water baptising. Yet Jesus did not acknowledge him as the baptist but a prophet in fact the greatest one.

Might be something...or am I grasping at straws?

Your thoughts.
 
Jun 11, 2020
1,370
424
83
73
#70
As I have stated to CS1, there is a difference between Kingdom of Heaven and Kingdom of God.

The former refers to the reign of Jesus on earth, a physical reality, a reality that was prophesied in the OT for Israel. That was not possible during the time of the 4 Gospels because Israel rejected their Messiah.

But as Paul explained in Romans 11, there comes a time in the future where all Israel will accept Jesus as their Messiah. That is where it will start.

But the Kingdom of God is about people being saved and received the Holy Spirit, which was only possible after Jesus died and rose from the dead. This is spiritual, with joy peace, all the fruit of the Holy Spirit described by Paul.

Paul also talk about this Kingdom of God when he preached to both Jews and Gentiles. He never offered the physical reign of Jesus on Earth at anytime.
In the normal usage of words, the "Kingdom OF Heaven" means a Kingdom OUT OF Heaven. The connotation is that the King and Laws already established in Heaven will be transported to somewhere else and enforced. The Kingdom of God is even more simple. It is the area, domain or sphere were God's Kingship is recognized and His Laws are enforced. If Christ does not return to earth, the King will be missing. Who will enforce His Laws. Thus, without Christ there is no Kingdom. But Matthew starts with Jesus Christ, seed of Abraham and seed of David. Immediately we see His status ON EARTH, for that is the domain of Abraham and David. Abraham is promised the Land of Canaan as an "everlasting possession", and he is promised the "Whole World" in Romans 4:13. Our Lord Jesus, being seed of Abraham, must INHERIT Canaan, and He must INHERIT the whole world. And, as seed of David, He is promised to sit on David's Throne forever. He is thus BOTH, (i) King of Israel, and (ii) King of kings.

The Kingdom of Heaven is pointedly NOT for Israel because they are "earthy", are as the "sand of the sea shore", has a Law written forst in stone and later in their hearts, and will display a "terrestrial glory" in resurrection. Much more, the Church is "of a heavenly calling" (Heb.3:1), is born from ABOVE (Jn.3:3-6 - lit.Gk.), Look to heaven for the coming of their Lord, focus on heavenly things, have their treasure in heaven, have a King who came down from heaven and have "celestial glory" in resurrection.
  1. The Kingdom of David is for Israel and is in Canaan ON EARTH - Jesus is that King in Jerusalem (Zech.14:16)
  2. The Kingdom of Heaven - the rules enforced in heaven, is brought TO EARTH by our Lord Jesus and the Church. They rule the cities of the Gentiles (Lk.19:17-19)
  3. The Kingdom of God is established by Jesus thrashing the Gentiles at Armageddon in a military battle (Dan.2:34-35, 44-46). Since the Gentiles are on earth, Christ will be King of the EARTH
 
Jun 11, 2020
1,370
424
83
73
#71
This subject is very interesting to me because it's the one thing that Jesus commanded us to do and enabled us to do and have athority to do yet the scriptures never record Jesus baptising anyone.
His reply to John as in why John should baptise him peaks my interest also..."suffer it to be so now"
So if we baptise any one are we carring on John's ministry or Jesus ministry.
Another thing to place before us all is that John the Baptist was known throughout the land for his water baptising. Yet Jesus did not acknowledge him as the baptist but a prophet in fact the greatest one.

Might be something...or am I grasping at straws?

Your thoughts.
You are addressing a massive subject. I count at least five reason why a Believer is Baptized. But in answer to your question:
John was a prophet who came in the Spirit of Elijah and was the greatest "born to a woman". This statement is a terrible judgement on John because if we take the whole verse (Matt.11:11; Lk.7:28), John's greatness is only in the realm if those who are NOT BORN AGAIN. To get into the Kingdom one must be born of the Spirit and out of water (Jn.3:3-5). That is, the "least" in the Kingdom was, is, and will be, greater than John Baptist BECAUSE he/she is NOT BORN of WOMAN - but the Holy Spirit. To be born again one must BELIEVE (Jn.1:12-13). John did not. He sent his disciples to ask Jesus if He was the ONE.

John was a great servant of the Lord. He did his job. But in the final test it was shown that he did not believe Who Jesus was. Yes, he believed that Jesus was son of David and he believed that Jesus was the sacrificial Lamb of God, but he did not believe that Jesus was the son of God (like Peter - Matt.16). Some theologians have coined a sad but true idiom. "John did not recognize Who his Head was - so he lost his head". In case some are very new Christians, Christ is the Head of the Church. If John had believed he would have told his DISCIPLES to follow Jesus. But he stayed "head" of his disciples, as we learn in Matthew 9:14 and 11:2.

Leaving that shocking state of affairs, we turn to the second reason one should be IMMERSED. The first has been discussed. It is a SIGN of a Christian joining the Covenant with Abraham (not any other Covenant). The second reason is that the old is not worthy of the new. Immediately after Adam had eaten of the forbidden Tree, a barrier was put between him (and all men to come) and the Tree of Life. The reason given in Genesis 3:22 is that if he "also" ate from the Tree of Life, he would not die. Why did God allow Adam to die? Because his polluted and corrupted body was not fit for the future Kingdom of God. 1st Corinthians 15:50-53 tells us this and that that we must either ne resurrected or "changed". That is, physical death is God's way of dealing with the old and unworthy.

Now, the earth was IMMERSED in water TWICE and will IMMERSED in FIRE ONCE (i) before Adam, at (ii) Noah's time and (iii) at the Great White Throne. All three IMMERSIONS are an ending of the old system and preparing the way for the new. Both Adam and Noah saw a "pristine earth" after the immersion was over. Turning to individual men, Abraham, an idol-worshiper (Josh.24:2), to reach the promised Land, must pass through "a flood" - no doubt, the Euphrates River. And Israel, on their journey to the Good Land, must pass through the Red Sea and the Jordan in "flood" (Josh.24:14). The old way is unacceptable to God for His recovery. He lets the old die and raises up, out of the death waters of IMMERSION, a New Man. The old must be "buried" and the new come out of the death waters. So when Israel reached Jordan and were on the cusp of the Kingdom of Israel, the were to take 12 stones into the Jordan, place them on the river floor, and take twelve stones from out of the river and place them in a monument on the bank of Jordan. Anybody God uses for His plan and/or purpose MUST BE SYMBOLICALLY IMMERSED.

To inherit the Promise, the OLD must be dead and buried. And out of this death must come the new. And this is why our Lord Jesus insisted on His Baptism. Not because He was a sinner, but, as son of Mary, He belonged to the old. Mary came form Adam and so our Lord Jesus, though He was sinless, was, in His intrinsic human nature - Adamic (Luke's genealogy confirms this). Because He was not the son of a man (Joseph), He did not have the fallen nature of all other men, but He was still 100% man because He came from Mary - and Mary belonged to the old.

Turning to Romans 6 we see the old buried and the new coming forth (vs.1-8). In 1st Corinthians 10 we see that we are to make the same journey as Israel - which includes IMMERSION. The SECOND REASON for Baptism is that you show a SIGN that you abhor the old creation and declare it unfit for the NEW. By REFUSING IMMERSION YOU SHOW THAT YOU ARE WORTHY OF THE KINGDOM IN YOUR POLLUTED AND CORRUPTED STATE AND THEREBY CONTRADICT GOD. If any Christian has doubts about whether he/she should be Baptized just COPY your Lord. Is the servant greater than the Master???
 
L

Locoponydirtman

Guest
#72
Do NOT use human reasoning to decide the validity of Water Baptism........human reasoning CANNOT understand the Mind, Heart, Plan and Purposes of God.....

So, how are we to understand? We have to have ears to hear what the Holy Spirit is saying.

In humility, just simply ask God questions and the Holy Spirit will give us understanding.....

Here's how my conversation with God went.......

Me: So, Lord, please may the Holy Spirit help us to understand what Water Baptism is for........

God: What was circumcision for?

Me: A sign of covenant.

God: Could circumcision save anyone?

Me: No.

God: The same is true with Water Baptism - it's a sign of covenant but, it cannot save you.

Me: Lord, please tell me how is Water Baptism a sign of covenant?

God: Water Baptism is to be done in the presence of witnesses that you and I are entering into covenant. I promise to save you with My Son - Jesus Christ with His Blood and Body and I also promise to give you the Holy Spirit that raised Him from the dead; in return you promise to submit to My Will - the Father's Will and believe on the ONLY Savior I have given you, My Son - My Lamb and receive the gift of My Holy Spirit.

In Water Baptism, the person believes and confesses My Son - Jesus Christ as Lord, Savior and King. They are placed in My Hands ("into Your Hands, Father I commit my Spirit..."). A sign of total submission to God The Father. In My Hands the person is totally submerged under the water as a sign of being buried with My Son and when the person comes up out of the water, they are raised to new life by the power of God The Holy Spirit - the same Spirit that raised My Son from the dead.

Water Baptism is the sign of the New Covenant God The Father, God The Son, and God The Holy Spirit has made with Man. Man is to be ONE with God in the Kingdom of Heaven that is coming.

Me: Thank You, for giving us understanding. Truly, we know NOTHING unless You, by Your Holy Spirit give us understanding. Thank You, Father.

Whoever has an ear to hear, let him hear what the Spirit is saying......amen. :love:(y)
Are you claiming God told you this?
 

Nehemiah6

Senior Member
Jul 18, 2017
24,446
12,932
113
#73
Can you see a difference in the two?
We need to understand that there was a present application as well as a future application to Israel regarding the remission of sins. I already told you to check Ephesians 2 for the present application. And Romans 11 is about the future application. They are both true in their own places.

PRESENT APPLICATION: REMISSION OF SINS FOR THE CHURCH
But God, who is rich in mercy, for his great love wherewith he loved us, Even when we were dead in sins, hath quickened us together with Christ, (by grace ye are saved... Now therefore ye are no more strangers and foreigners, but fellowcitizens with the saints, and of the household of God...

FUTURE APPLICATION: REMISSION OF SINS FOR ISRAEL
And so all Israel shall be saved: as it is written, There shall come out of Sion the Deliverer, and shall turn away ungodliness from Jacob [ISRAEL]: For this is my covenant unto them, when I shall take away their sins.
 
Mar 28, 2016
15,954
1,528
113
#74
This subject is very interesting to me because it's the one thing that Jesus commanded us to do and enabled us to do and have athority to do yet the scriptures never record Jesus baptising anyone.
His reply to John as in why John should baptise him peaks my interest also..."suffer it to be so now"
So if we baptise any one are we carring on John's ministry or Jesus ministry.
Another thing to place before us all is that John the Baptist was known throughout the land for his water baptising. Yet Jesus did not acknowledge him as the baptist but a prophet in fact the greatest one.

Might be something...or am I grasping at straws?

Your thoughts.
I would say the baptizing prophet.

Scripture does record Jesus from the tribe of Judah baptizing .It is the key to understanding the transition from the old to the new testament John the last Levi under the nation of Jews alone. The priesthood became men and woman from all nations or tribes.

For John was not yet cast into prison.Then there arose a question between some of John's disciples and the Jews about purifying. And they came unto John, and said unto him, Rabbi, he that was with thee beyond Jordan, to whom thou barest witness, behold, the same baptizeth, and all men come to him.John answered and said, A man can receive nothing, except it be given him from heaven.John 3:24-27
 
P

pottersclay

Guest
#75
You are addressing a massive subject. I count at least five reason why a Believer is Baptized. But in answer to your question:
John was a prophet who came in the Spirit of Elijah and was the greatest "born to a woman". This statement is a terrible judgement on John because if we take the whole verse (Matt.11:11; Lk.7:28), John's greatness is only in the realm if those who are NOT BORN AGAIN. To get into the Kingdom one must be born of the Spirit and out of water (Jn.3:3-5). That is, the "least" in the Kingdom was, is, and will be, greater than John Baptist BECAUSE he/she is NOT BORN of WOMAN - but the Holy Spirit. To be born again one must BELIEVE (Jn.1:12-13). John did not. He sent his disciples to ask Jesus if He was the ONE.

John was a great servant of the Lord. He did his job. But in the final test it was shown that he did not believe Who Jesus was. Yes, he believed that Jesus was son of David and he believed that Jesus was the sacrificial Lamb of God, but he did not believe that Jesus was the son of God (like Peter - Matt.16). Some theologians have coined a sad but true idiom. "John did not recognize Who his Head was - so he lost his head". In case some are very new Christians, Christ is the Head of the Church. If John had believed he would have told his DISCIPLES to follow Jesus. But he stayed "head" of his disciples, as we learn in Matthew 9:14 and 11:2.

Leaving that shocking state of affairs, we turn to the second reason one should be IMMERSED. The first has been discussed. It is a SIGN of a Christian joining the Covenant with Abraham (not any other Covenant). The second reason is that the old is not worthy of the new. Immediately after Adam had eaten of the forbidden Tree, a barrier was put between him (and all men to come) and the Tree of Life. The reason given in Genesis 3:22 is that if he "also" ate from the Tree of Life, he would not die. Why did God allow Adam to die? Because his polluted and corrupted body was not fit for the future Kingdom of God. 1st Corinthians 15:50-53 tells us this and that that we must either ne resurrected or "changed". That is, physical death is God's way of dealing with the old and unworthy.

Now, the earth was IMMERSED in water TWICE and will IMMERSED in FIRE ONCE (i) before Adam, at (ii) Noah's time and (iii) at the Great White Throne. All three IMMERSIONS are an ending of the old system and preparing the way for the new. Both Adam and Noah saw a "pristine earth" after the immersion was over. Turning to individual men, Abraham, an idol-worshiper (Josh.24:2), to reach the promised Land, must pass through "a flood" - no doubt, the Euphrates River. And Israel, on their journey to the Good Land, must pass through the Red Sea and the Jordan in "flood" (Josh.24:14). The old way is unacceptable to God for His recovery. He lets the old die and raises up, out of the death waters of IMMERSION, a New Man. The old must be "buried" and the new come out of the death waters. So when Israel reached Jordan and were on the cusp of the Kingdom of Israel, the were to take 12 stones into the Jordan, place them on the river floor, and take twelve stones from out of the river and place them in a monument on the bank of Jordan. Anybody God uses for His plan and/or purpose MUST BE SYMBOLICALLY IMMERSED.

To inherit the Promise, the OLD must be dead and buried. And out of this death must come the new. And this is why our Lord Jesus insisted on His Baptism. Not because He was a sinner, but, as son of Mary, He belonged to the old. Mary came form Adam and so our Lord Jesus, though He was sinless, was, in His intrinsic human nature - Adamic (Luke's genealogy confirms this). Because He was not the son of a man (Joseph), He did not have the fallen nature of all other men, but He was still 100% man because He came from Mary - and Mary belonged to the old.

Turning to Romans 6 we see the old buried and the new coming forth (vs.1-8). In 1st Corinthians 10 we see that we are to make the same journey as Israel - which includes IMMERSION. The SECOND REASON for Baptism is that you show a SIGN that you abhor the old creation and declare it unfit for the NEW. By REFUSING IMMERSION YOU SHOW THAT YOU ARE WORTHY OF THE KINGDOM IN YOUR POLLUTED AND CORRUPTED STATE AND THEREBY CONTRADICT GOD. If any Christian has doubts about whether he/she should be Baptized just COPY your Lord. Is the servant greater than the Master???
Obviously you put much time and effort into this theology. I cannot and would not consider all that you said is valid.
The old testament is the new hidden and the new is the old revealed at least that is my belief.
Jesus also said that all the scriptures point to him.
To say that John was just a ordinary man would invalidate some scriptures about him.
One being that God prophesied of John in the book of Malachi.
Two that John acknowledged the Christ before he was born.
Not to mention he was a blood relative to Jesus.

We are told time and time again that Israel killed the sent prophets now a bad king that represents Rome kills a prophet of the Lord.
John's father was a servant in the temple so we know that John knew his scriptures.
So my question is what did John prophesied. What did John bring to the table sorta speak?
 
P

pottersclay

Guest
#76
I would say the baptizing prophet.

Scripture does record Jesus from the tribe of Judah baptizing .It is the key to understanding the transition from the old to the new testament John the last Levi under the nation of Jews alone. The priesthood became men and woman from all nations or tribes.

For John was not yet cast into prison.Then there arose a question between some of John's disciples and the Jews about purifying. And they came unto John, and said unto him, Rabbi, he that was with thee beyond Jordan, to whom thou barest witness, behold, the same baptizeth, and all men come to him.John answered and said, A man can receive nothing, except it be given him from heaven.John 3:24-27

although in fact it was not Jesus who baptized, but his disciples.

New Living Translation
(though Jesus himself didn’t baptize them—his disciples did).

English Standard Version
(although Jesus himself did not baptize, but only his disciples),

Berean Study Bible
(although it was not Jesus who baptized, but His disciples),

Berean Literal Bible
(although indeed Jesus Himself was not baptizing, but His disciples),

New American Standard Bible
(although Jesus Himself was not baptizing, but His disciples were),

New King James Version
(though Jesus Himself did not baptize, but His disciples),

King James Bible
(Though Jesus himself baptized not, but his disciples,)

Christian Standard Bible
(though Jesus himself was not baptizing, but his disciples were),

Contemporary English Version
But Jesus' disciples were really the ones doing the baptizing, and not Jesus himself.