The war against HCQ has intensified unbelievably

That's what they're about isn't it? Disinformation? When there are HCQ peer reviewed papers and viable studies concerning the viability of HCQ with regard to Covid 19, what does anyone need to argue? They're 100% against the proofs off site already. Think about that brother.

New Study Shows That Hydroxychloroquine Saves Lives, States AAPS


A just published peer-reviewed study from Henry Ford Health System showed that the death rate of hospitalized patients who received hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) was cut in half, and there were no serious heart abnormalities.

The Association of American Physicians & Surgeons (AAPS) stated that these results should encourage widespread early use of this long-established drug to fight COVID-19.

“HCQ impressively improved survival. In contrast, the government-favored drug remdesivir has only been shown to decrease survivors’ hospital stay by four days, with no demonstrable improvement in survival,” notes AAPS.

Even before the Henry Ford study, there was substantial evidence of HCQ benefit, especially when used very early in out-patients in combination with zinc, in a compilation of studies prior to April 20, a more recent compilation, and a preprint by Dr. Vladimir Zelenko and colleagues released July 3. Yale epidemiologist Harvey Risch, M.D., wrote that HCQ is an “early outpatient treatment of symptomatic, high-risk Covid-19 patients that should be ramped-up immediately as key to the pandemic crisis.”

Based on flawed studies and pronouncements from government officials, doctors have hesitated to use HCQ because of claimed lack of proof of efficacy, or purported danger of cardiac arrhythmias. Two studies, in Lancet and NEJM, were retracted because of questionable data. A study from Brazil, published in JAMA, is under investigation because researchers were giving patients lethal doses of chloroquine.

Researchers have been using HCQ too late, when patients may already have COVID-caused heart damage, and overdosing patients, states AAPS.

“If HCQ saves half the patients who would have died in hospital, then withholding HCQ is causing tens of thousands of preventable deaths,” states AAPS.

“The federal government has agreed to buy 500,000 doses of remdesivir at more than $3,000 per course of treatment, without proof that it will save lives. Why won’t it release HCQ, which costs about $20 per course of treatment, from the Strategic National Stockpile, and stop prohibiting or discouraging its use?” asks AAPS.

“Patients are dying needlessly every day.”

AAPS has filed for a preliminary injunction to stop interference by the FDA with patient access to HCQ, and to prevent the government from wasting the HCQ which was donated to its stockpile. This lawsuit is pending in federal court in Grand Rapids, Michigan, AAPS v. FDA, et al., 20-cv-493.

The Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS) has represented physicians of all specialties in all states since 1943. The AAPS motto is omnia pro aegroto, meaning everything for the patient.

Related Video:

The Henry Ford Health System study has been posted more than once in these threads as the best evidence so far that HCQ helps critically ill COVID patients. It was something like 2400 critically ill patients, 1/2 received HCQ and half did not. Of the half that received HCQ 13% died. Of the half that did not receive HCQ 26% died. Now this MIGHT be because of the HCQ. If the test was repeated more than once and continued to yield the same results it would prove that HCQ increases survive-ability rate/ lowers death rates and by how much.
You still need to repeat the test and by now I would think that data is available. Does anyone know about a second test to confirm it? I would want to see the additional test statistics before I would be comfortable saying it has been PROVEN to cut death rate in half. I don't think the first test PROVES that but it is a very good sign that it might.

My point is insulin was a generic drug, the patented and put back on market for profit.

So this whole HQC stuff is bogus ... if it was a viable treatment it would have undergone the same process.

Remdesivir is only administered for the most ill and not even used in the same way as a treatment.

yes, we MUST believe that covid is the new black death.


no hope, all the doctors that say hydroxy is a treatment are lying, we MUST live in fear of the new black death.

lock everything down, be australia and new zeland, and force everyone to stay home...

Where I live we have opened up and we are doing well for 3 weeks now...numbers holding steady... must be some people cannot follow some basic guidelines elsewhere.

how about this- we do not need ' rules",

what we need is accurate numbers and the truth about the death rate.

sweden never did a hard lockdown, never required a mask, and their numbers are pretty much nothing.

hope all you rule followers remember folks like me and others telling you this when the " mask required " goes to " vaccine required" and then to " i d chip required"

will you follow the rules when that comes to pass??

how about this- we do not need ' rules",

what we need is accurate numbers and the truth about the death rate.

sweden never did a hard lockdown, never required a mask, and their numbers are pretty much nothing.

hope all you rule followers remember folks like me and others telling you this when the " mask required " goes to " vaccine required" and then to " i d chip required"

will you follow the rules when that comes to pass??

That is not true at all about Sweden.
And actually it was only because the people willingly followed the protocols that it was not a bad as it could have been.
Go look at Brazil ..
Seriously go read about the Spanish Flu of 1918 they wore masks back then too.

yes, it is true in sweden.

as of today, they have about 8,000 cases and less than 50 deaths this month.

i would call that pretty well contained.

and, brazil is reporting that 3 million of the 3.8 million people that had the virus have recovered.

and, yes folks wore masks back during the spanish flu. and they went about their business without all the other garbage that we have to put up with today.

and. for the record, i do wear a mask as my city mandated it ( which they have 0 authority to do, that is another subject)

and i wear it in any store that requires it, that is there right as a private business.

but that is as far as i go.
as far as a vaccine and chip, they can stick that where the sun does not shine. ( 1980's slang, you can figure out where that is)

yes, it is true in sweden.

as of today, they have about 8,000 cases and less than 50 deaths this month.

i would call that pretty well contained.

and, brazil is reporting that 3 million of the 3.8 million people that had the virus have recovered.

and, yes folks wore masks back during the spanish flu. and they went about their business without all the other garbage that we have to put up with today.

and. for the record, i do wear a mask as my city mandated it ( which they have 0 authority to do, that is another subject)

and i wear it in any store that requires it, that is there right as a private business.

but that is as far as i go.
as far as a vaccine and chip, they can stick that where the sun does not shine. ( 1980's slang, you can figure out where that is)

Let me just respond to one thing.

Many of the same measures were put in place during the second wave in 1918, when people did not learn from the first wave. Schools closed three months and some places longer where I live according to confirmed historical record.

As well individual cities in the USA that implemented certain measures fared much better than those that did not again according to historical record.

First of all in Feb 2020, it was a novel virus, means they were trying to figure it out and not many countries were at all prepared with PPE, you should be thankful it was not like SARs Cov-1 although easier to contain because of the short incubation .. people become sick within a day or two however far, far more deadly!!

Like I stated a virus is very easily avoided if people follow a few basic measures.

Well, if Brazil had reacted appropriately they would not have mass graves... but it seems some Christians are willing to let the elderly die as long as they can still go to the cinema, as one poster has already made clear.

this is not about going to see a movie, or out to eat somewhere,

this is about letting a government take away indavidual rights and freedoms , of which the population will not get back.

like hawaii is setting up covid checkpoints, with mandatory testing before being allowed to travel oh the h-3 freeway on oahu.

you think that is o k ?? should not the citizens revolt over that??

again, everywhere you see " mask required" will soon say " vaccine required" and then on the el chipo.

and Christians like you will be telling us to shut up and go along with it,

shameful.

this is not about going to see a movie, or out to eat somewhere,

this is about letting a government take away indavidual rights and freedoms , of which the population will not get back.

like hawaii is setting up covid checkpoints, with mandatory testing before being allowed to travel oh the h-3 freeway on oahu.

you think that is o k ?? should not the citizens revolt over that??

again, everywhere you see " mask required" will soon say " vaccine required" and then on the el chipo.

and Christians like you will be telling us to shut up and go along with it,

shameful.

That is ridiculous I have never once promoted taking the vaccine.