Police Retiring In Large Numbers

The police chief and other high-ranking officials in Rochester NY have resigned. All over the country police are retiring so fast they have had to limit how many can leave at once. Not that I blame them in the least.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2020/09/08/rochester-police-resign/

I don't blame them one bit. They obviously feel that their services are not appreciated. The mass retirements of those in law enforcement is a phenomenon of defund by attrition. I am certain that gun sales have risen dramatically as a result of the misguided defund the police nonsense.

This means that the thugs and criminals have won through rioting and anarchy. Which should never have happened in a country where the rule of law is supposed to prevail.

Had President Trump turned this around and made all police officers into US Marshals on June 1, the tables would have been turned, and the police forces would have not only been strengthened, but given even more authority as federal law-enforcement agents. They would then have no longer been under the whims of local or state politicians.

At the same time, he could have set up an INDEPENDENT investigative commission to thoroughly root out all the bad eggs and rogue officers. This would have cleaned the police forces nationwide and restored respect for law enforcement.

United Nations Agenda 21, 1992, 179 nations agreed to it which they probably all agree to it now, sustainability development, ecology, economy, social.

Ecology- harmony between nature and people, which all people will be taken out of the rural areas and placed in the cities, and no development can happen outside city limits, and communities work together to help to stop crime, and their job is to watch the street and watch their neighbor, which this also helps to cause people to cooperate together, and the streets are monitored with eyes on the street.

Economy- everybody equal economically, and go by their needs, which the stimulus check is probably a pattern for basic income for many jobs will not be available when they establish Agenda 21 in their nation, for many jobs are not needed, and resources are limited, and the people cannot pursue their wants as they once did, and they care about the ecology so they want to cut down on pollution.

It would seem like alcohol, cigarettes, and drugs, will not be tolerated at that time for they are not going to waste time dealing with people with failing health because they do those things, and also they are habits and people will steal, and hurt people for their habits, and they will not tolerate that for they are serious about having peace.

Gangs, Mafia, and anybody like them will be busted up, and separated, and if people do not act right in their communities then they will be an outcast, and they do not want that, and all people basically become the police as they all people watch out for crime, and participate to keep their communities free from crime.

That is why the police are not needed.

Social- all people are equal social status wise.

Cities to regionalize their cities.

Target date for all nations to be compatible with Agenda 21, 2030, and for a global government that will be a balance between communism and democracy, which the nations agree to that for they can keep their communism but have to be a little softer, and can keep their democracy but have to be a little bit harder, but they do not care about that for it is not enough difference for them to not go along with a global government, and they want a global government.

The purpose of the nations now is to make themselves Agenda 21 compatible, put all people equal, and stop people heaping money to themselves for that is a division, and stop the different social status levels for that is a division, and ban the police for that is a division, and to make their government compatible with how the global government will operate in the future to take away that division of government of the world, and if there is any division among them in the nation's government like America.

Controlled conflict brings about controlled change.

BLM is the start of Agenda 21, equality, ban the police, talks about sustainability on their website.

The protests were planned before the protests began, and the government wants them to protest, riot, and steal, and burn, and cause chaos, for they want a division between Right Wing and Left Wing, for it is time to divide them up to have a war between them, and then they will stop that war and go to a new form of government and disband the Republican and Democrat party, and stop the fighting between Right Wing and Left Wing and say they have to do that for the peace and safety of the nation, but the main reason is they want to be compatible with Agenda 21 and the global government to come.

Republican and Democrat are working together and are fighting more with each other so the people will fight with each other more so they will clash with each other.

BLM is pushing Left Wing, liberal, and socialism, and will gather all the people that side with them together.

The people that oppose BLM, Right Wing, conservative, and democracy, will gather all the people on that side together.

For the government wants them to have a division between them, and a civil war, so they can go to a new form of government.

They will not let it escalate too much for they have to get the ball rolling in putting the people all equal, and establishing Agenda 21, and move the people in the rural areas to the cities, and have cooperation and harmony between them.

But enough of conflict to say they have to go to a new form of government and stop the fighting, and to show the nation that freedoms to not work, for they cause protests, and riots, and divisions, and fighting, and allowing public displays of prejudice that cause fighting.

President Trump will win the election which then the protesters will really go bonkers, and then the government can put them down, and have a new form of government.

President Trump used to be a Democrat, and now a Republican president, but President Trump is probably a liberal and conservative, but he is playing his role of the Republican for right now.

For it is all a game they are playing, and what Trump wants Obama wants, and what Obama wants Trump wants for the end goal, for they are concerned with the global government to come, and not how the government operates now.

And I think it's a record high for first time female gun owners too.

I’m a little concerned about the cries for another law enforcement system on a federal level. The United States is founded on the states, and the concept of states rights should not be violated more than it already has.

Down here in Texas we sure don’t want Washington to gain more power. We’re Texas and we can take care of our business be what it may.

Furthermore I’m disappointed to see that these cries for Washington come whenever a Republican is President. He should fight these tendencies tooth and nail.

First of all, I can see your point

When things are getting totally out of hand federal level can intervene according to the law.

Otherwise it should be left to the states.

I don’t want Washington making all kinds of excuses for taking power away from the states.

I can not blame the Police for seeking early retirement, or simply changing occupations. The dangerous part of defunding is that it serves to put the lives of all Police Officers in grave danger in my opinion. This serves to put the lives of all citizens in grave danger. Evil is winning the day, but it will not win the war. I know this because Scripture tells me it is true.

God bless any man or woman who chooses to serve as a Law Enforcement Officer at any level.

In a way that's a good thing. Yet, that means things are gonna get bad.......

IMO, there is really only one way this will end if does not end by the Feds stepping in

I think we know what that might be ...ie all the gun sales?

never never never should anyone have given in to the ridiculous demands. I'll stop there

And remember the Democrats in office that permit domestic terrorists to act out unabated because police have been ordered to stand down are of the same party that wants to disarm Americans.

I don't think police should retire due to the domestic terrorism that's jumping off in America unabated by governors and mayors of those cities where it occurs. It shows the terrorists they're winning! And that will only embolden them.

I think police, who in many cases in those under siege cities have been disarmed by their chief, should carry weapons anyway as a citizen. And when they see that laser that the terrorists are using so as to blind them permanently due to burning out their retinas, follow the beam before it can locate the next victim and shoot the one holding the laser. Terminate with extreme prejudice.
Further, that militia groups in occupied cities haven't stopped armed domestic terrorists is a real travesty. But it also sends a message as to the level of compromise that's occurring in America. And not for the better of course.

Maybe after the election, since that seems to be the hold back factor for prosecution and the enabling factor for these democratic leaders who have no problem aiding and abetting domestic terrorists, the law will come back and be enforced as it should have always been. Damn the election. Protect the cities! But then again, the Supreme Court said years ago that police have no lawful obligation to protect and serve. And apparently city mayor traitors are reminding them of that.

Maybe after the election the traitors in office in Seattle and Portland and elsewhere, will be arrested and tried for treason. Oh, wouldn't that be a great day?

Which cancels out the good thing.

I think when the mayors of Seattle and Portland respectively, and those state governors sustain and defend domestic terrorism in those areas under their charge, that the Fed. has every right to step in. Federal law supersedes state law.

Insurrection Act of 1807 - Wikipedia


— Andy Ngô (@MrAndyNgo) July 22, 2020

Here are some snapshots of the "peaceful protests:"

7-22 Liberal Professor: The Feds Have Every Right to Defend Federal Property