ALERT: THE VACCINE MIGHT BE THE MARK OF THE BEAST

And we Branch Covidians hope you will have Saint Paul like epiphany on the road to Da-Mask-Us.

"The vaccine includes plain old sugar, also called sucrose. It’s acting here as a cryoprotectant to safeguard the nanoparticles when they’re frozen and stop them from sticking together. "

I think we are talking about such small amounts in a vaccine dosage it can't be compared to the harm from a high sugar diet.

Every story that I have seen posted by a user on CC from Zerohedge that I read had grossly altered the facts of the story. Every single one. Which is why I don't even read them anymore. Not a one was honest reporting. Some were out right lies, most were taking a partial truth and then interpreting it to mean something other than what was said. For example quoting statements about how 75% of people in the clinical trials had experienced severe adverse affects and that it was unsafe. When in reality 75% experienced adverse affects which are mild fevers, head aches muscles aches, but this was considered normal and a sign that the immune system was reacting and creating antibodies, and this is SAFE. To say it is unsafe because of these reactions is a lie. But this is the kind of lies in all of the reports from ZeroHedge so I don't read them anymore.
Zero Hedge is blacklisted on Reddit. LOL

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zero_Hedge

Be informed.

Is any news source unbiased or 100% honest these days? We could probably find a reason to distrust every single source out there.

Legal ownership of water? Squash Vitamin C? I am unaware of those things...when did that happen?

We are really more about prevention then prescriptions, so take a few different things especially right now of course.

20 pages behind? This thread is rip roaring along!

Hmmm. Well I know if you buy land you don't always get the water rights and some states say it's "illegal" to use a water catchment system. Maybe that's what "legal ownership of water" means?

THIS, is exactly what I'm talking about.

Who the hell says Wikipedia is unbiased for God's Sake!!?

Reminds me of The Lorax:

In Thneedville, the air is not so clean.
So we buy it fresh.
IT COMES OUT THIS MACHINE!
It's Satisfactions-guaranteed-ville!

I truly pray you are right.

I'd bet the ranch you are wrong.

THAT I can believe!!

A true Cult.

Really do not know. We have a well and had one before also. Great water the first time but need treatment for hard water this time. Still, lots of water.

Ah, I would love to have a well!
My dad had one and it made my hair soooo soft. What a difference from city water!

How big is the ranch? I'm just asking for a friend.

Yes to both. The Vitamin C thing happened here in Canada quite a few years ago. Maybe about 30? Um, yeah, my memory is a bit foggy sometimes, heehee, with my advancing age (that's my excuse and it's sticking to me! ). But it would have been around the time, the only time, I was considering leaving the profession I had been in for many years (all my adult life) to study and practice alternative health methods, and that was the late 80s/early 90s. Things like that Vitamin C thing happening did not make such a change look very appealing/promising, so I stayed where I was

And the water ownership thing? Yeah, Monsanto tried that in South America; the Bolivian government allowed it (of course they get paid mega big bucks to do so) but it ended badly because the people rose up and revolted against the disgusting scheme which included not allowing the citizens to collect rain water. I doubt Monsanto will stop there.

In Cochabamba, Bolivia, the people, led by union leader Oscar Olivera, forced the giant engineering company Bechtel, a globalist partner of Monsanto, to leave the country and stopped a World Bank imposed privatization scheme that more than doubled the price of water to the local people. The mainstream press was, of course, reluctant to tell this story. It's hard to even describe the evil of Monsanto in a brief article. source

There are many, many people involved in editing, correcting, citing sources. I like how it works. Mistakes are discovered faster and corrected faster than the set of books we used to use growing up. It is getting better every year are more and more academically qualified people participate in making it accurate and include sources and links to data I never knew existed on the internet.

There is no comparison to how Wikipedia works and zerohedge.

I guess if someone sees a conspiracy behind Wikipedia then there is no use explaining how Wikipedia works. If they wanted to find out they could read about it.

I believe Wikipedia has built into it a good method for verifying information, citing sources, correcting errors and having so many people involved world wide that it is one of the best methods for collecting knowledge today. Not just the articles, but the sources cited so that you can follow a never ending trail of credible sources for any subject you are interested in. It is not perfect but in my opinion it is more credible than the sets of books we used growing up. Those books had errors that never got corrected.

It is fake news. A vaccinne takes decades to be developed. 7 years for the earliest and the average years to 20 years. We in the past had 7 different coronavirus and not 1 vaccine was developed that is effective 100 %. The flu vaccinne a good year would be 40% effective. And how come, the scientists not develope a vaccine for aids. Because if we hear the news of television we believe the lies. What is really different about this coronavirus. This is fear tactics being used to manipulate the masses. I rather stay in the word of God and learn lessons from nature than to trust in humans for solving to sickness and disease. All false hope and lies from the father of lies. They are trying to work miracles or counterfeit God's miracles.

Welcome to the 21st century. Vaccines really only got started between the 1920s and 1940s. It is about time for a breakthrough. If this works like the trials prove it did, then you can expect more breakthroughs with mRNA in the near future. Give it a few years and we may have cured a few cancers with mRNA.

Nothing you just said proves that the COVID 19 vaccines don't work. Failures in making effective vaccines for other viruses does not prove that no vaccines can be successful for a different virus. The COVID 19 is not the ______ flu (whichever one of the influenza viruses you name) It is not the HIV virus.
There have been many other successful vaccines for other viruses. They have almost eliminated polio. I think there were 33 cases world wide in 2018, and more in 2019, possibly due to antivaxxers scaring people.
Your logic does not work. You should be praising God that we were successful with a COVID 19 vaccine instead of complaining about it, but each person has to be responsible to answer to God for the light that they have.