Not By Works

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

star

Senior Member
Nov 8, 2017
1,582
2,046
113
North Carolina
Whoa there, I have not nor need not accuse anyone of sin -- you guys admit to it by virtue of your repeated, stubborn, supposed Biblically defended claim that keeping the law is not possible, right or wrong?
Don't run around telling people you can't keep the law, and then get mad at them if they take you at your word.

You phonman do NOT keep the law. If you did, you would be perfect as Jesus Christ. You are far from it. If the law of Moses could be keep by humans, there would be no need for Christ.
 
May 22, 2020
2,382
358
83
ANSWER THE QUESTIONS OR GO ELSEWHERE. So you do not mind reading the biggest Paraphrase ever ? ? ? The 1611 team admitted that is what they did in the 1611 ORIGINAL PREFACE.

READ IT FOR YOURSELF:
http://www.ccel.org/bible/kjv/preface/pref1.htm

My Guess is you are Mormon, am I right ? ? ?

I could care less of ...opinion. I rely on the Word...God's .......word reflected in the KJV 1611 edition.
Witness the fact that we ...all of a sudden...since 1960's .....have several new bible editions. Why?
Notice all the new editions have a slanted revision watering down God's word...and His intent. They say for clarity...LOL...the Bible 1611 edition, is clear enough that a 10 year old can understand what he must do to be born again and receive eternal salvation after being saved by God's judgement. Who needs more.
How about making money...huh?...another reason. There are several new editions in production now.

Remember, the Bible says...: in the end times there will be great (not just deceptions)...great deceptions.
Great, clearly reflects being miss led and lost. After all..being miss led and loose eternal damnation is the worst thing that could happen to a earthly being.
 
May 22, 2020
2,382
358
83
ANSWER THE QUESTIONS OR GO ELSEWHERE. So you do not mind reading the biggest Paraphrase ever ? ? ? The 1611 team admitted that is what they did in the 1611 ORIGINAL PREFACE.

READ IT FOR YOURSELF:
http://www.ccel.org/bible/kjv/preface/pref1.htm

My Guess is you are Mormon, am I right ? ? ?

Me thinks you like being wrong. Last response to your question.
 

Magenta

Senior Member
Jul 3, 2015
55,885
26,048
113
You phonman do NOT keep the law. If you did, you would be perfect as Jesus Christ. You are
far from it. If the law of Moses could be keep by humans, there would be no need for Christ.
I was going to quote Peter from Acts 15 earlier... Now is as good a time as any :D

5 Then some of the believers who belonged to the party of the Pharisees stood up
and said, “The Gentiles must be circumcised and required to keep the law of Moses.”


6 The apostles and elders met to consider this question. 7 After much discussion,
Peter got up and addressed them: “Brothers, you know that some time ago God made
a choice among you that the Gentiles might hear from my lips the message of the gospel
and believe.
8 God, who knows the heart, showed that He accepted them by giving the
Holy Spirit to them, just as He did to us.
9 He did not discriminate between us and them,
for He purified their hearts by faith.
10 Now then, why do you try to test God by putting
on the necks of Gentiles a yoke that neither we nor our ancestors have been able to bear?

11 No! We believe it is through the grace of our Lord Jesus that we are saved, just as they are.”

:)
 

oyster67

Senior Member
May 24, 2014
11,887
8,696
113
So you deny what Ephesians 2 says?
I believe everything Ephesians 2 says. I believe everything the whole Bible says. I am not a clipper-snipper-cutter-paster. The Bible Truth is not difficult to comprehend or understand.
 

oyster67

Senior Member
May 24, 2014
11,887
8,696
113
I am not a Calvinist, because I do not agree with 2 of the 5 points of Calvinism. And I sure ain't an Arminian.
Besides we Evangelicals BURIED that Calvinist vs. Arminian argument in the early 80's, SO WHO KEEPS DIGGING
THAT SMELLY CORPSE UP ? ? ?
Sorry about that. I feel like such a dirty :poop:dog.:oops: Glad we agree that Calvinism (along with all them other 'isms) is smelly. At least we are moving in the right direction now.
 

oyster67

Senior Member
May 24, 2014
11,887
8,696
113
ANSWER THE QUESTIONS OR GO ELSEWHERE.
He does not have to answer any questions and he may stay as long as he likes.

So you do not mind reading the biggest Paraphrase ever ? ? ? The 1611 team admitted that is what they did in the 1611 ORIGINAL PREFACE.
The 1611KJV is a beautiful Bible and it is not a paraphrase of itself.
 

oyster67

Senior Member
May 24, 2014
11,887
8,696
113
If the law of Moses could be keep by humans, there would be no need for Christ.
Amen. And if some people were preprogrammed to go to Heaven, they would not need to plead the Blood either. There are still a few Calvinist here. They did not all die off in the 80's. Only by faith in the sin-cleansing Blood of Jesus can a man be saved, and the call goes out to all.
 

VCO

Senior Member
Oct 14, 2013
11,969
4,586
113
He does not have to answer any questions and he may stay as long as he likes.


The 1611KJV is a beautiful Bible and it is not a paraphrase of itself.
It is a Paraphrase of 5 or 6 Earlier English BIBLES, they admitted it in the 1611 Origininal Preface. They were contacted by King James to update the English Language to the English he Spoke. In questionable verses, they used the Septuagint and the Latin Bible, to verify it, but they did not go to the original Language Versions. That is a Paraphase and not an original Language TRANLATION at Best.

Here is an excerpt:


The Translators To The Reader
Zeale to promote the common good, whether it be by devising any thing our selves, or revising that which hath bene laboured by others, . . .​
. . .​
But how shall men meditate in that, which they cannot understand? How shall they understand that which is kept close in an unknowen tongue? . . . so lest the Church be driven to the like exigent, it is necessary to have translations in a readinesse. . .​
. . .​
Yet it seemed good to the holy Ghost and to them, to take that which they found, (the same being for the greatest part true and sufficient) rather then by making a new, in that new world and greene age of the Church, to expose themselves to many exceptions and cavillations, as though they made a Translation to serve their owne turne, and therefore bearing witnesse to themselves, their witnesse not to be regarded. This may be supposed to bee some cause, why the Translation of the Seventie was allowed to passe for currant. . . . he holdeth the Authours thereof not onely for Interpreters, but also for Prophets in some respect: and Justinian the Emperour enjoyning the Jewes his subjects to use specially the Translation of the Seventie, rendreth this reason thereof, because they were as it were enlighted with propheticall grace. . . .​
. . . This is the translation of the Seventy Interpreters, com- monly so called, which prepared the way for our Saviour among the Gen- tiles by written ERRORS preaching . . . It is certain, that that Translation was not so sound and so perfect, but it needed in many places correction; . . . {KNOWN in the Septuagint} . . . (and Saint Jerome affirmeth as much) that the Seventie were Interpreters, they were not Prophets; they did many things well, as learned men; but yet as men they stumbled and fell, one while through oversight, another while through ignorance, yea, sometimes they may be noted to adde to the Originall, and sometimes to take from it; which made the Apostles to leave them many times, when they left the Hebrew, and to deliver the sence thereof according to the trueth of the word, as the spirit gave them utterance. This may suffice touching the Greeke Translations of the old Testament. . . .​
. . . But now the Latin Translations were too many to be all good, for they were infinite (Latini Interprets nullo modo numerari possunt, saith S. Augustine.) [S. Augustin. de doctr. Christ. lib 2 cap II]. Again they were not out of the Hebrew fountain (we speak of the Latin Translations of the Old Testament) but out of the Greek stream, therefore the Greek being not altogether clear, the Latin derived from it must needs be muddy. . . .
There were also within a few hundreth yeeres after CHRIST, translations many into the Latine tongue: for this tongue also was very fit to convey the Law and the Gospel by, because in those times very many Countreys of the West, yea of the South, East and North, spake or understood Latine, being made Provinces to the Romanes. But now the Latine Translations were too many to be all good, . . . Now the Church of Rome . . . Yea, so unwilling they are to communicate the Scriptures to the peoples understanding in any sort, that they are not ashamed to confesse, that wee forced them to translate it into English against their wills. . . .​
. . .​
And to the same effect say wee, that we are so farre off from condemning any of their labours that traveiled before us in this kinde, either in this land or beyond sea, either in King Henries time, or King Edwards (if there were any translation, or correction of a translation in his time) or Queene Elizabeths of ever-renoumed memorie, that we acknowledge them to have beene raised up of God, for the building and furnishing of his Church, and that they deserve to be had of us and of posteritie in everlasting remembrance. . . . . . . . . . but let us rather bless God from the ground of our heart, for working this religious care in him, to have the translations of the Bible maturely con- sidered of and examined.​
. . . the same will shine as gold more brightly, being rubbed and polished; also, if anything be halting, or superfluous, or not so agreeable to the original, the same may be corrected, and the truth set in place. {KNOWN ERRORS} . . .​
Yet for all that, as nothing is begun and perfited at the same time, and the later thoughts are thought to be the wiser: so, if we building upon their foundation that went before us, and being holpen by their labours, doe endevour to make that better which they left so good; no man, we are sure, hath cause to mislike us; they, we persuade our selves, if they were alive, would thanke us. . . .​
. . .​
to have the translations of the Bible maturely considered of and examined. For by this meanes it commeth to passe, that whatsoever is sound alreadie (and all is sound for substance, in one or other of our editions, and the worst of ours farre better then their autentike vulgar) the same will shine as gold more brightly, being rubbed and polished; also if any thing be halting, or superfluous, or not so agreeable to the originall, the same may bee corrected, and the trueth set in place. . . .​
. . .​
Now to the later we answere; that wee doe not deny, nay wee affirme and avow, that the very meanest {poorest} translation of the Bible in English, set foorth by men of our profession (for wee have seene none of theirs of the whole Bible as yet) containeth the word of God, nay, is the word of God. . . .​
. . .​
Yet before we end, we must answere a third cavill and objection of theirs against us, for altering and amending our Taanslations [sic] so oft; wherein truely they deale hardly, and strangely with us. {The very same thing you do to MODERN Translations.} For to whom ever was it imputed for a fault (by such as were wise) to goe over that which hee had done, and to amend it where he saw cause? . . .​
. . .​
But the difference that appeareth betweene our Translations, and our often correcting of them, is the thing that wee are specially charged with; let us see therefore whether they themselves bee without fault this way, (if it be to be counted a fault, to correct) and whether they bee fit men to throw stones at us: But it is high time to leave them, and to shew in briefe what wee proposed to our selves, and what course we held in this our perusall and survay of the Bible. Truly (good Christian Reader) wee never thought from the beginning, that we should neede to make a new Translation, nor yet to make of a bad one a good one, (for then the imputation of Sixtus had bene true in some sort, that our people had bene fed with gall of Dragons in stead of wine, with whey in stead of milke, but to make a good one better, or out of many good ones, one principall good one, not justly to be excepted against; that hath bene our indeavour, that our marke. . . .​

{ That makes it a PARAPHRASE and not an actual Translation from the original languages. }
 
Aug 3, 2019
3,744
507
113
There you go again with the analogy of husband cheating on wife. Is that the only example you have? You seem stuck on that one item. Your analogy of the "sin" scripture pertaining to salvation is distorted. "While we were yet sinners, Christ died for us" We are saved from our sins, past, present and future. Yes, we are to live as much like our Lord and Savior as possible through the power of the Holy Spirit. But as long as any human is alive on this planet, there will be a war between our sinful self and our spiritual, forgiven self.
Why try to improve on it? Marriage was given as an example to the universe of the kind of relationship our Creator desires to have with His creatures.

The reason it rubs you the wrong way is because it so effectively exemplifies the utter illegitimacy of a OSAS License to Sin.
 
Aug 3, 2019
3,744
507
113
I certainly hope you do not compare yourself to Jesus Christ and His ability to overcome temptation. If you do, that in itself is sacrilege
Oh, so Jesus had an advantage over us?

If that were true, Satan would have an irrefutable accusation against God as totally unjust for condemning humanity for failing to do that which only Jesus was equipped to: keep the commandments.

Jesus had NO advantage over you or me. His daily prayer life, study life, and purposed heart to do the Father’s will got Him thorough and can get us through. No need for a OSAS License to Sin.
 

Magenta

Senior Member
Jul 3, 2015
55,885
26,048
113
Oh, so Jesus had an advantage over us?

If that were true, Satan would have an irrefutable accusation against God as totally unjust for condemning humanity for failing to do that which only Jesus was equipped to: keep the commandments.

Jesus had NO advantage over you or me. His daily prayer life, study life, and purposed heart to do the Father’s will got Him thorough and can get us through. No need for a OSAS License to Sin.
Laughable. Were you born of a virgin, sired by the Holy Spirit of God? Was the universe created by you, making you its master that you can calm storms, walk on water, heal lepers, turn water into wine, give sight to the blind etc etc etc??? Okay, so now you are denying the Deity of Jesus Christ also? As well as what the apostles agreed upon regarding keeping the law. LOL. You in deep doo doo.
 

Evmur

Well-known member
Feb 28, 2021
4,913
2,532
113
London
christianchat.com
Whoa there, I have not nor need not accuse anyone of sin -- you guys admit to it by virtue of your repeated, stubborn, supposed Biblically defended claim that keeping the law is not possible, right or wrong?
Don't run around telling people you can't keep the law, and then get mad at them if they take you at your word.
The law is not a means of salvation, it is not given for that purpose, the point is nobody can so perfectly obey the law as to attain righteousness by it. Nor can the state of salvation be maintained by keeping the law.

Since the law did not save us how can it keep us saved?
 

Evmur

Well-known member
Feb 28, 2021
4,913
2,532
113
London
christianchat.com
Oh, so Jesus had an advantage over us?

If that were true, Satan would have an irrefutable accusation against God as totally unjust for condemning humanity for failing to do that which only Jesus was equipped to: keep the commandments.

Jesus had NO advantage over you or me. His daily prayer life, study life, and purposed heart to do the Father’s will got Him thorough and can get us through. No need for a OSAS License to Sin.
God's purpose is to make us see how hopelessly lost and without hope we are ... then we will cry out "what must we do to be saved?"
 

Evmur

Well-known member
Feb 28, 2021
4,913
2,532
113
London
christianchat.com
Predestination and election is simply another way of looking at foreknowledge. We cannot see or fathom this because we have neither God's eyes nor His mind. No worries. Just trust Him and take His Word for it. This whole idea of total depravity and inability to make a decision to serve Him came from the pit of hell, not the Word of God. We all start out in unbelief. We all have the opportunity to come to the Light. This is what the Word says.
Predestiny and election does not mean we do not have to hear the gospel and believe it and repent and be born again.

When we first enter the church we see written upon the lintel "whosoever will" but when we look back upon entering we see written "chosen in Christ before the world began"

We are of ourselves unable to choose or decide for Christ, God the Holy Ghost must first do a work in our hearts. I do not believe in Total Depravity.
 

gb9

Senior Member
Jan 18, 2011
11,728
6,319
113
Oh, so Jesus had an advantage over us?

If that were true, Satan would have an irrefutable accusation against God as totally unjust for condemning humanity for failing to do that which only Jesus was equipped to: keep the commandments.

Jesus had NO advantage over you or me. His daily prayer life, study life, and purposed heart to do the Father’s will got Him thorough and can get us through. No need for a OSAS License to Sin.

ah, now i am starting to understand- you are one of those who do not think Jesus was fully man and God while on earth.

have not seen one of ya'll in a while......
 

VCO

Senior Member
Oct 14, 2013
11,969
4,586
113
Reference to Ducks in the picture, Post #151,219 . Interesting Fact, Lunes sometimes Carry their ducklings on their back.

. 1617065249534.jpeg . 1617065304195.jpeg .

.
.