Matthew 25:42 and how you vote

A Christian could easily vote this way and still be in favor of supporting the less fortunate. He or she may well accept the responsibility for caring for the poor but do not see it as the government's responsibility to do so.
It is not necessary for the government to support people on a national level. There are plenty of state governments who can decide such issues and traditionally it has been the church that has supported the poor. Because the church has failed to do so many people have turned to the government for help. And government has become their God.

That's another "theoretical" group of people, and situation, isn't it?

For me, there's just not enough data in that statement to discern that it actually happened in real life.
It would be remarkable in its vagueness if it wasn't so commonplace.
Must be from some media outlet, I'd guess?

Regardless if it passed of not. these 42 politicians were against helping the those in need. You cannot dance around that.

GOD held Sodom and Gomorrah responsible for not helping the poor.

He held the people of the cities responsible. But not for their lack of responsibility to the poor but for their perversion.

But these are 42 theoretical politicians.

I mean, can you name all 42?

Can you show me the bill?
Can you talk about the riders that were most likely attached?
Can you produce the entire register of who voted to pass and who voted against and who abstained?

Did you just read this somewhere and assume it to be true?
There was a thing that I read once that goes something like this:

You can choose to pay attention to the media, and be misinformed;
or you can choose to not pay attention to the media and be uniformed.
Which are you? Misinformed, or Uninformed?
I choose to be uniformed... then I think that I make less mistakes.

You keep avoiding my questions and that's concerning to me.
I don't like to dance, but you kinda' seem to be dancing.

“‘Now this was the sin of your sister Sodom: She and her daughters were arrogant, overfed and unconcerned; they did not help the poor and needy. 50 They were haughty and did detestable things before me. Therefore I did away with them as you have seen. Ezekiel 16:49-50

Yes...they were punished for a whole range of sins, not just one.
But your entire premise is wrong because God is not speaking about government. Your link of government to the care of the needy is not made by God but you.

The 42 of Republicans in the House who voted against the package include Republican Study Committee Chair Jim Banks of Indiana, Freedom Caucus Chair Scott Perry of Pennsylvania, Arizona Rep. Andy Biggs, Colorado Rep. Ken Buck, Florida Rep. Matt Gaetz, Georgia Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, Ohio Rep. Jim Jordan, Arizona Rep. Debbie Lesko, Illinois Rep. Mary Miller, and Texas Rep. Chip Roy.....but you're going to object because I didn't ALL 42. LOL This is a matter of congressional record. DO you still support their vote? Just answer me that. Do agree they should end the school lunch program? Will you take food away from children?

Thanks for posting that partial list... I don't object that it's only partial, I appreciate any attempt when people are trying and doing their best!

I never said that I support or oppose anyone. I would have hoped that was clear... why do you think otherwise?

DO you still support their vote? Just answer me that. Do agree they should end the school lunch program? Will you take food away from children?

You know John, it's a bit frustrating when a conversation is one-sided and also when someone isn't really listening to the other person. I've asked you, repeated several questions that you have seemingly ignored. Now you ask me if I am still doing something that I have never even talked about...?
It's becoming clear to me that you don't really want to have a conversation but rather just want to espouse your preconceived ideas and project them on me.

Not sure why you're doing that... but while I think that's rude behavior, I respect your right to live your life the way that you want to.

CARING FOR THE POOR IS GOVERNMENT'S BIBLICAL ROLE

How does the government actually do this in scripture, though? Is it by taxation and redistribution of wealth?

you will be rewarded for helping the poor.

I was thinking more along the lines of the first century.

-you have Jesus criticizing the rich personally for neglecting their fellow Israelites, and he doesn't criticize the Sanhedrin for not having social welfare programs.
-Jesus criticizes the pharisees for their corban rule that circumvents family taking care of family. (not the government)
-Although Jesus disciples were communal for a while, I don't believe that was an indicator of how he would have ran the government had the temple/rulers submitted to Jesus: I think it was more a preparation for the evangelism that would need to occur from 33-70.
-The government descends further and further into chaos after they reject Jesus, and eventually the Sanhedrin is disbanded.
-The Jews who became Christians escape the destruction of Jerusalem.

With respect to the Assyrian/Babylonian captivity, the criticisms are similar. The land owners are not doing land sabbaths, and not leaving behind food that should be left available to the poor when they harvest. The leaders are drunken and perverting justice. Idolatry is everywhere- but no criticism for not having government welfare programs. The whole country is depraved and Isaiah says this:
Except the LORD of hosts had left unto us a very small remnant, we should have been as Sodom, and we should have been like unto Gomorrah.

I was thinking more along the lines of the first century.

-you have Jesus criticizing the rich personally for neglecting their fellow Israelites, and he doesn't criticize the Sanhedrin for not having social welfare programs.
-Jesus criticizes the pharisees for their corban rule that circumvents family taking care of family. (not the government)
-Although Jesus disciples were communal for a while, I don't believe that was an indicator of how he would have ran the government had the temple/rulers submitted to Jesus: I think it was more a preparation for the evangelism that would need to occur from 33-70.
-The government descends further and further into chaos after they reject Jesus, and eventually the Sanhedrin is disbanded.
-The Jews who became Christians escape the destruction of Jerusalem.

With respect to the Assyrian/Babylonian captivity, the criticisms are similar. The land owners are not doing land sabbaths, and not leaving behind food that should be left available to the poor when they harvest. The leaders are drunken and perverting justice. Idolatry is everywhere- but no criticism for not having government welfare programs. The whole country is depraved and Isaiah says this:
Except the LORD of hosts had left unto us a very small remnant, we should have been as Sodom, and we should have been like unto Gomorrah.

"
"Senator Rick Scott wants to "sunset" Social Security and Medicare" Google it

For I was hungry, and you didn’t feed me. I was thirsty, and you didn’t give me a drink. I was a stranger, and you didn’t invite me into your home. I was naked, and you didn’t give me clothing. I was sick and in prison, and you didn’t visit me.’
“Then they will reply, ‘Lord, when did we ever see you hungry or thirsty or a stranger or naked or sick or in prison, and not help you?’
“And he will answer, ‘I tell you the truth, when you refused to help the least of these my brothers and sisters, you were refusing to help me.’
“And they will go away into eternal punishment, but the righteous will go into eternal life.”
Matthew 25:42-46....

remember this when a politician wants to cut Social Security, Medicare or Food Stamps. If you support them, you might join them.

Sodom and Gomorrah both had kings, so they had governments.