Technological Signs relating to Christ’s Coming are being fulfilled.

Every instance of 'day-of-the-Lord' in the OT is referring to the very same 'day'.

Please see:

http://mywebsite.us/BibleStudy/Second_Coming.html

Every 'day of' and 'coming of' instance in the table are referring to the very same 'day' - the Second Coming of Christ.

BTW....70AD is neither the AoD nor part of the 70 week prophecy calculus. Numerically 70AD fits.....nowhere.

In the page from your site you listed Zephaniah 1:7 because it words it the same in this Scripture do you think "in his sight"(6440) is the same event? https://biblehub.com/interlinear/hosea/6-2.htm

Are you referring to the 'Day of the Lord' being 1000 years?

3rd day = millennium ?

Well in the spirit of the post I've made in the last few pages of this thread my instinct is yes,,,but,,, In curiosity I wondered if you included Zephaniah 1:7 because you felt it meant the same thing as "Day of the Lord" with it's usage of the word #6440 and wondered why Hosea 6:2 was not also included in your list when it also uses #6440.

Good succinct pointed refutation right there. Likewise there are hundreds of other passages that cannot have possibly come to pass.
BTW....70AD is neither the AoD nor part of the 70 week prophecy calculus. Numerically 70AD fits.....nowhere.

And more to your point, the final Bar Kokhba revolt occurred in about 136AD. The nation Israel was still intact and in the land even then, despite having no Temple.

At a glance - I would say these verses are talking about future events - yes.

But then - I am not a preterist.

Are you referring to the 'Day of the Lord' being 1000 years?

3rd day = millennium ?

At a glance

They are not.

Does not seem to be relevant to 'this generation' and the events that will occur. The siege of Jerusalem does not even begin to compare to the destruction that will 'soon' happen in the end-times, such as World War Three. For insights, I recommend the book of Jerimiah.

siege of Jerusalem does not even begin to compare

What is easier to do? Saying "They are not"?
Or actually proving it by supplying vast quantities of Bible passages? As if proving your case as if in a court of law?

Baseless opinions are a dime a dozen.

I would recommend the Matthew 24.

Jesus is very clear. The temple will be destroyed was a sign.



Tell that to the Jews who were eating their babies and blood flowed like a wine press.

He is speaking to his disciples plain and simple what to look for.

The Scriptures I gave were because several see the words soon,at hand,near ect. to mean what an man might see but looking at those Scriptures it would be easy to access that if they were written between 800 bce and 500bce and Jesus wasn't born until around the 1st century ad and the siege of Jerusalem took place in ad70 soon, near, at hand the way God gave it to those Prophets would be approaching a thousand years in it's self.

As towards the usage of soon,near ect. in the Revelation referring to a short time span as an man would see it or if it means a time span similar to the length of time of when those Old Testament Prophets received them and AD70 it would depend on when and how they were fulfilled(or not). I am quite patient though and if you see them as already being fulfilled at some time in the past I am all ears if you can explain to me their fulfillment's.

I'm not sure if you have ever read the historical writings of Josephus but if not here is a portion I have been working with for several years now and have ask a multitude of preterits about who they were taught to have received the mark in Revelation 13 or who they were taught were those who were killed because they refused to worship that image. http://penelope.uchicago.edu/josephus/war-2.html

Here is the issue though in that in Wars 2 Josephus gives the historical accounts stretching from Herod to Nero and Vespasion over about 69 years prior to the siege of Jerusalem. Now in Revelation 13 https://biblehub.com/interlinear/revelation/13.htm (if this is fulfilled) then someone would have received the beast mark to buy and sell with and someone would have worshiped the image of the beast. Now here is the problem though in that all across those 69 years those Jews did not worship Romes images(see wars 2) in fact instead of seeing the Caesars of Rome as Gods(pious) they were impious instead. In the issue of buying and selling with the beast money the Jews refused to do so and minted their own https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Jewish_Revolt_coinage and so they did not use Romes(the beast?) money. Anyway the issue remains in that in preterism all these things they say are already fulfilled by someone but it doesn't look as if it was by the Jews across those 69 years leading up to the destruction of the Temple. Anyway if you or any other preterist has another option as to who did fulfill these things I will listen.

The temple was destroyed as a sign that Jesus would rise from the dead after 3 days. Nothing in scripture says that this was a sign for 'this generation' to witness the end-time prophesies that would 'soon' take place.

At a glance - I would say these verses are talking about future events - yes.

At a glance - I would say these verses are talking about future events - yes.

But then - I am not a preterist.

Tell me how does it even make sense for Him to speak about the physical temple they were standing near and then switch to 2000 years in the future.

Jesus was speaking directly to his disciples and he was speaking about the temple which they had just departed.

He was actually pointing to the temple.

24 Jesus left the temple and was walking away when his disciples came up to him to call his attention to its buildings. 2 “Do you see all these things?” he asked. “Truly I tell you, not one stone here will be left on another; every one will be thrown down.”


Tell me how does it even make sense for Him to speak about the physical temple they were standing near and then switch to 2000 years in the future.