CJ Lovik with another prophecy backing up his 2030 return of Jesus

It’s a made-up term that legalisms use, attempting to add criteria to the good news of the gospel that Jesus taught.

Does it affect the day for a year 7000 years of human history perspective though? I'm thinking that it would if it adds at least 1800 years?

No it is not a made up term. Easy believism omits the necessity of repentance for the remission of sins, and for salvation.

Yes it certainly does. Strictly speaking that 7000 year hypothesis per se is not in the Bible BTW.

It’s completely made up, by legalists.
An idea not found anywhere in scripture.

The idea of leaving out repentance is definitely not found in Scripture. So do you believe that sinners must repent and believe on the Lord Jesus Christ or not? YES or NO will suffice.

What is the definition of repent as used in the Bible?

Going from unbelief to belief.. 180 degree out..

Rather than look at a text-book like definition, kindly study the book of Jonah. It illustrates repentance and the outcome of repentance. Then study the conversion of Saul to Paul (and all he had to say about his conversion). That was a turn of 180 degrees.

I like the 180 degree "turn" answer. To repent, I needed to turn to God, ask for forgiveness, and surrender my life to Him.

It's no longer about my selfish and sinful ways. It is accepting Jesus into my heart, so He can turn me into a child of God from the inside out--from selfish to selfless.

True and lasting repentance comes from God. I have no power on my own to turn and travel towards the ultimate goal--building the character of Jesus Christ.

Yes, I think that is the best understanding. It’s a course reversal. From “going your own way” to a realization that in doing so you are going the wrong direction. Then, there is sorrowful remorse for doing so for so long and an acknowledgment for the error and consequences that have come as a result of that path. Then— a turning away from that, to be directed by another, on a path not your own, by yielding to the will of the One who accepts you as His own. His child.

It’s like breaking a spirited horse. There is a moment when the bucking ceases and the animal realizes that resistance is futile- no longer in one’s own best interest. And it accepts the bit and bridle, and from there it can be directed and led and even so doing, find peace.

If you mean 6000 + 1000 = 7000....
Then actually....no. That doesn't fly if you know your Bible. Use the LXX to get those ancient time spans correct.

The return of Christ will be quick. He will suddenly appear. When I saw him one day in 1982 he appeared quickly. His glorious countenance shining brightly. He revealed his name to me and his all power. He spoke in clear and understandable English. He was very kind. His visitation lasted maybe 1 minute. This does not mean necessarily that I am more spiritual than other saints or that I am an Apostle. I can however testify to those who doubt the Truth and assure them that Jesus lives forever.

Dont get me wrong.....I think we are EXTREMELY close to the rapture. There is massive demonic occultic exposure happening lately. Not to mention these unprecidented prophetic fulfillments.

Technological Signs relating to Christ’s Coming are being fulfilled. - Christian Chat Rooms & Forums

We are in the last seconds of these "last times" yes. But setting dates per se is strictly VERBOTEN. And just plain dumb. You will certainly be discredited and will be liable to defaming the Body of Christ.

In the first few seconds of this false prophet's video, when he put the 70th week in our future, I shut it off. It is illogical to separate the 70th week from the 69th so as to force it into a man-made system.

A challenge to all you prophecy enthusiasts. Go to the online commentaries at https://www.studylight.org/commentaries/eng.html where you'll find 128 commentaries. Go though the commentaries on Daniel and note the date of the commentary. See at what time in history, when the 70th week of Daniel is thought to be separated from the first 69 weeks by over 2000 years. If anyone can find this taught prior to the mid-1800s, tell me in which commentary you find it.

Bullinger who received his theological training from 1860-1861, separates the 70th week.
Dr. Constable graduated from DTS in 1960 and separates the 70th week.
Read up on Arno C. Gaebelein here and notice the Zionist, Judaizing influences.
https://www.studylight.org/commentaries/eng/gab.html

John Gill, 18th century pre-mil Baptist does not separate the 70th week over 2000 years from the 69th.

The Adam Clarke commentary published in 1825 reads on Daniel 9:25 -

From the coming of our Lord, the third period is to be dated, viz., "He shall confirm the covenant with many for one week," that is seven years, Da 9:27.

This confirmation of the covenant must take in the ministry of John the Baptist with that of our Lord, comprehending the term of seven years, during the whole of which he might be well said to confirm or ratify the new covenant with mankind. Our Lord says, "The law was until John;" but from his first public preaching the kingdom of God, or Gospel dispensation, commenced.

These seven years, added to the four hundred and eighty-three, complete the four hundred and ninety years, or seventy prophetic weeks; so that the whole of this prophecy, from the times and corresponding events, has been fulfilled to the very letter.

As far as I can find, Adam Clarke pretty much summarizes the understanding that the 490 weeks ended in the 1st century. The 70th week not separated from the 69th. If anyone can find early Bible scholars projecting the 70th week to our future, please give me a reference. Dispensationalism must be read into the Bible for you surely cannot find it taught in the Bible itself.

Is this the same CJ Lovik that's YouTube video in 2020 predicted the Rapture would take place "in the Fall of 2021 at the latest"?

Nice TRY Mr Begg.
You have so much in right relation to the Scriptures. However because of your fault in following "tradition" you have a 49 and not a complete 50 year cycle. Can't you see the beauty of 6,000 or even 7,000 being divisible by 50's? Meaning Adam sined in year 1 of creation (Tishri-10th of creation Month-1) and the 2nd Adam Yeshua, will advent a 2nd time in Jubilee/Yovel year 6,001. Yeshua did not die and return to His place in the year 4,000 but 4,001 C.f., Hosea 5:15-6:2. It is possable, Yeshuah died in 30-AD meaning Adam sined when 5-days old Tishri-6 to on Tishri-10th as remorializing new-years-day for the 1st ever Yovel year of the Jubilee calendar in 3,971-BC?
Please stop doing math matical gymnastics and keep it simply Biblical.

Romans 2:4 NKJV:

"Or do you despise the riches of His goodness, forbearance, and longsuffering, not knowing that the goodness of God leads you to repentance?"

lol you're telling me "keep it simply Biblical" yet you're making up the exact amount of days Adam was when he sinned?