Daniel 9 Already Fulfilled

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.

GaryA

Truth, Honesty, Love, Courage
Aug 10, 2019
9,120
3,974
113
mywebsite.us
#61
What are these "desolations"? They are in fact the judgements of the Great Tribulation, and Christ connected the setting up of the Abomination with the Great Tribulation: When ye therefore shall see the abomination of desolation, spoken of by Daniel the prophet, stand in the holy place, (whoso readeth, let him understand... For then shall be great tribulation, such as was not since the beginning of the world to this time, no, nor ever shall be. (Mt 24:15,21)
Nope - an erroneous interpretation.
Yes - Jesus did, in a way, "connect" the AoD with the 'great tribulation' (as he defined it in Matthew 24:21); however, ...

Matthew 24:

15 When ye therefore shall see the abomination of desolation, spoken of by Daniel the prophet, stand in the holy place, ( whoso readeth, let him understand: )

You need to know what this part is about so that you can better understand the nature of that "connection"...

You cannot obtain a proper understanding of what Matthew 24:15 is saying without knowing what the parenthetical statement means.

(Which the Jew-Christians at that time understood perfectly.)
 

GaryA

Truth, Honesty, Love, Courage
Aug 10, 2019
9,120
3,974
113
mywebsite.us
#62
You cannot obtain a proper understanding of what Matthew 24:15 is saying without knowing what the parenthetical statement means.
Well - other than accepting that it is saying the exact same thing as Luke 21:20 - which is exactly what it is saying.
 

GaryA

Truth, Honesty, Love, Courage
Aug 10, 2019
9,120
3,974
113
mywebsite.us
#63
(The time frame for/of the events described in Matthew 2:15-20 / Mark 13:14-18 / Luke 21:20-23a is circa 70 A.D.)
 

Dino246

Senior Member
Jun 30, 2015
24,733
13,406
113
#64
Actually it is the naysayers do not understand that "everlasting righteousness" means exactly that. And that "an end of sins" means exactly that. But if they do not believe it, that is not my problem.
You are imposing your interpretation and claiming it is "the correct" interpretation. Your dismissive attitude just makes you come across as arrogant and unteachable.
 

Everlasting-Grace

Well-known member
Dec 18, 2021
5,016
1,540
113
#65
Why daniel 9 is not yet fulfilled

1. The first thing we need is context. Daniel 9 is Gods answer to Daniels PraYer concerning his people (israel) his city (Jerusalem) and God promises to them.

Vs 24. 70 weeks are determined for your people and your holy city

2. The things God said would be completed at the end of the 70 weeks have yet to be completed

A) Israel is still in sin
B) If they are still in sin,, The 70 weeks is yet unfulfilled

3. 70 AD occured almost 40 years after the 69 week, it does not fit in the 70th week.

4. The abomination of desolation has yet to happen

5. The covenant between the future prince and many for 1 week (7 years) has never occurred

6. If we go to Matt 24, the great tribulation has yet to occur

I can give more reasons. But really all we need is 1 reason. And this is more than 1.
 

GaryA

Truth, Honesty, Love, Courage
Aug 10, 2019
9,120
3,974
113
mywebsite.us
#66
All of you folks who believe there is a gap between the 69th and 70th weeks are approaching the prophecy "all wrong"...

The prophecy says that "Seventy weeks are determined upon thy people and upon thy holy city" - and, beginning when "from the going forth of the commandment to restore and to build Jerusalem" occurs.

That means 490 years from then to the end of the 70 weeks - period - no gap.

Accept what it says - don't try to change it into something you want it to say.

~

From http://mywebsite.us/BibleStudy/Seventy_Weeks.html :

While this discussion is mainly focused on the verses quoted above, it is offered in the context of the whole chapter - in which, Daniel is pleading for mercy from the Lord concerning the sins of Israel. In answer to his prayer, the Lord sends the angel Gabriel to explain to Daniel what God has appointed for Israel.

As you read what follows, remember that the two italicized phrases in the previous paragraph indicate what the chapter - and the prophecy - is about.

The phrase 'Times of the Jews' (based on the phrase 'Times of the Gentiles' in Luke 21:24) refers to the 'era' during which God is "dealing with the Jews" - before turning His attention to "dealing with the Gentiles" during the 'Times of the Gentiles'. This passage of scripture (Daniel 9:24-27) describes the last 490 years of "the time the Jews have left" before God turns His attention to the Gentiles. In essence, God is informing them that "their time" is coming to an end - and, telling them what is to transpire before it ends.

~

The prophecy is about what remains of the 'Times of the Jews'. That's it - nothing more, nothing less.

The prophecy is not about any future recommencement / regeneration / rejuvenation / renewal / restoration / revitalization / revival of Israel.

The prophecy is about the First Coming of Christ and not the Second Coming of Christ.

Accept what it says - and interpret accordingly.
 

GaryA

Truth, Honesty, Love, Courage
Aug 10, 2019
9,120
3,974
113
mywebsite.us
#67
The prophecy is not about any future recommencement / regeneration / rejuvenation / renewal / restoration / revitalization / revival of Israel.

The prophecy is about the First Coming of Christ and not the Second Coming of Christ.

Accept what it says - and interpret accordingly.
Brother @Nehemiah6 - I am not against you - I only want for you to see the truth concerning the 70 weeks of Daniel.

There are most certainly [other] passages of scripture concerning 'Future Israel' as well as the Second Coming of Christ; however, Daniel 9:24-27 is [simply] not one of them.
 

GaryA

Truth, Honesty, Love, Courage
Aug 10, 2019
9,120
3,974
113
mywebsite.us
#68
1. The first thing we need is context. Daniel 9 is Gods answer to Daniels PraYer concerning his people (israel) his city (Jerusalem) and God promises to them.

Vs 24. 70 weeks are determined for your people and your holy city
Please see post #66 (and the web page linked-to in that post).

2. The things God said would be completed at the end of the 70 weeks have yet to be completed
They have been completed.

A) Israel is still in sin
B) If they are still in sin,, The 70 weeks is yet unfulfilled
The Bible does not say or indicate that.

3. 70 AD occured almost 40 years after the 69 week, it does not fit in the 70th week.
It does not have to. It fits the prophecy.

4. The abomination of desolation has yet to happen
It has - in 167 B.C.

5. The covenant between the future prince and many for 1 week (7 years) has never occurred
The Bible does not say or indicate that.

6. If we go to Matt 24, the great tribulation has yet to occur
It has been happening for the past ~2000 years...
 

Melach

Well-known member
Mar 28, 2019
2,026
1,512
113
#69
The short answer is the AOD = The Roman Army because they also fulfill what the historic AOD was: the ending of the temple daily.

Just as a reminder; Historicists believe end-time prophecies are fulfilled progressively throughout human history, proving that God steers human events and that everything that has happened in the last ~2k years is laid out by God's end-time prophecies. So time is our context. Now, within any eschatological position, there are nuanced disagreements but overall this is how we treat prophecy.


Order of Events:

1) Matthew 24 begins just after Messiah gives a scathing rebuke to the Pharisees and His lament of His people rejecting Him. At the very end of chapter 23 He says, "BEHOLD, your house is left unto you desolate! For I say unto you, you shall not see me again, until you say, 'Blessed is he that cometh in the name of the Lord!"

2) The Messiah (God in the flesh) was hurt by their rejection and passed judgment on the people. If the words of a true prophet always come true then what of the words of THEE Word of God? So however it happens, Messiah's words caused the desolation.

3) In Matthew 24, Messiah and His disciples are walking out of the temple as the disciples admire its structures, when Messiah says "You see all of this? Not one stone will be left standing". The disciples then asked him when it would happen and what will be the signs of His return and the end of the age.

----

So the Messiah's Olivet Discourse describes (a) the destruction/desolation of that Temple, (b) the punishment of the Jews, and (c) a summary of events to follow until He returns.

- The temple was always known as "The House", whether "The House of the Lord", or "The [Jews'] House of Worship". Messiah was in the house rebuking the Pharisees and His people in Matthew 23.

- At the end of Matthew 23, Messiah tells them that THEIR HOUSE, that temple, will be made desolate for rejecting Him.

- Now, if we reference Daniel 9:26-27 [KJV] it says:

And after [62 weeks] shall Messiah be cut off, but not for himself:

...and the people of the prince that shall come shall destroy the city and the sanctuary; and the end thereof shall be with a flood, and unto the end of the war desolations are determined.

27 And he shall confirm the covenant with many for one week: and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease, and for the overspreading of abominations he shall make it desolate, even until the consummation, and that determined shall be poured upon the desolate.


So Daniel 9:26-27 says:
- The Messiah will be cut off
- The city and Sanctuary (Temple) will be destroyed (by the people of the prince to come)
- He shall make it desolate (whoever "he" is)

And in Matthew 23:38-39 Messiah says:
- Your house (Temple) is now left desolate

....So, in hindsight from the Historicist POV, the Messiah is "He" who was prophesied to make The 2nd Temple desolate in Daniel 9:27 and history testifies to its desolation in 70 AD.

Desolation = Destruction. This is our context for Matthew 24:15.

----


4) Messiah lists several events that would begin before the destruction of the temple: Deception (false prophets), Wars, Famines, Pestilences (disease/death), and signs like Earthquakes in random places. These would start. Mark 13:1,6-8, and Luke 21:5,8-11 are additional witnesses testifying to the same Olivet Discourse listing these same events that were to begin before the Temple's desolation.

So we can synchronize all three gospels and let each fill in the missing pieces.


5) Messiah then tells the disciples that they were going to suffer, be persecuted, and killed before the destruction of the temple, but that through them the gospel will be preached to all the nations.

The Book of Acts is an account of the disciples spreading the gospels to all the nations of the known world while being persecuted and killed fulfilling this prediction. History records the martyrdom of the apostles (except for John) in the 1st century AD before 70 AD destruction.


6) In Matthew 24:15, Messiah then says "When you see the abomination of desolation standing in the holy place - as spoken by Daniel - GET OUT!" Mark 13:14 records Messiah saying, "When you see the abomination of desolation standing where it ought not - as spoken by Daniel - GET OUT!" But Luke 21:20 records Messiah saying, "When you see Jerusalem compassed with armies, then know that the desolation is near. GET OUT!"

- Desolation = Destruction, which we know happened in 70 AD.

- The temple's destruction was to involve an army surrounding and besieging Jerusalem.

- Something abominable must have stood in the holy place, where it ought not to be before the destruction of the temple.

So in my view, the Messiah is referring to the Roman army as the "abomination of desolation". It is that army entering into the holy city and onto the temple mount that is the "abomination" that eventually desolates the temple. Messiah references Daniel because the passages prophesy all AODs that were meant to occur starting when the daily sacrifice was first ended by Antiochus Epiphanes in 167 BC.

The priests were commanded to keep the fire of the altar continually burning and to offer a morning and evening lamb each day. This was not a sacrifice for sin, but an offering. But each time they were prevented from doing so it was considered "desolation".

Daniel 8:13
Then I heard one saint speaking, and another saint said unto that certain saint which spake, How long shall be the vision concerning the daily sacrifice, and the transgression of desolation, to give both the sanctuary and the host to be trodden under foot?


So, the Roman army, ending the daily sacrifice for good by destroying the temple completely, is the AOD. Once they begin to enter into the city (Luke 21:20) the people in the know were to flee.

The Timeframe of tribulation for the Jews begins.
so you would say we are still in the great tribulation that started in back then? do you believe 2 thessalonians 2:3 is future or past? the man of sin standing in the temple proclaiming to be God.
this seems to be the pope
 

selahsays

Well-known member
May 31, 2023
2,397
1,355
113
#70
so you would say we are still in the great tribulation that started in back then? do you believe 2 thessalonians 2:3 is future or past? the man of sin standing in the temple proclaiming to be God.
this seems to be the pope
The great tribulation has not happened yet. This happens when the Antichrist comes to the earth after being kicked out of heaven.

Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come, except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition; Who opposeth and exalteth himself above all that is called God, or that is worshipped; so that he as God sitteth in the temple of God, shewing himself that he is God. 2 Thessalonians 2:3-4

I believe 2 Thessalonians 2:3 is definitely future. The “man of sin” is none other than Satan (he will come as the Antichrist). He will set himself up in Jerusalem claiming to be God. Many will be deceived and will worship him. The word for “falling away” in the Greek is apostasy.

And they had a king over them, which is the angel of the bottomless pit, whose name in the Hebrew tongue is Abaddon, but in the Greek tongue hath his name Apollyon. Revelation 9:11

The beast that thou sawest was, and is not; and shall ascend out of the bottomless pit, and go into perdition: and they that dwell on the earth shall wonder, whose names were not written in the book of life from the foundation of the world, when they behold the beast that was, and is not, and yet is. Revelation 17:8
 

selahsays

Well-known member
May 31, 2023
2,397
1,355
113
#71
Here is when Satan is kicked out of heaven:

And there was war in heaven: Michael and his angels fought against the dragon; and the dragon fought and his angels, And prevailed not; neither was their place found any more in heaven. And the great dragon was cast out, that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan, which deceiveth the whole world: he was cast out into the earth, and his angels were cast out with him. Revelation 12:7-9
 

Everlasting-Grace

Well-known member
Dec 18, 2021
5,016
1,540
113
#72
Please see post #66 (and the web page linked-to in that post).


They have been completed.


The Bible does not say or indicate that.


It does not have to. It fits the prophecy.


It has - in 167 B.C.


The Bible does not say or indicate that.


It has been happening for the past ~2000 years...
you will just make up anaything as you go to make it all fit wont you?
 

jb

Senior Member
Feb 27, 2010
4,940
589
113
#73
The short answer is the AOD = The Roman Army because they also fulfill what the historic AOD was: the ending of the temple daily.

Just as a reminder; Historicists believe end-time prophecies are fulfilled progressively throughout human history, proving that God steers human events and that everything that has happened in the last ~2k years is laid out by God's end-time prophecies. So time is our context. Now, within any eschatological position, there are nuanced disagreements but overall this is how we treat prophecy.


Order of Events:

1) Matthew 24 begins just after Messiah gives a scathing rebuke to the Pharisees and His lament of His people rejecting Him. At the very end of chapter 23 He says, "BEHOLD, your house is left unto you desolate! For I say unto you, you shall not see me again, until you say, 'Blessed is he that cometh in the name of the Lord!"

2) The Messiah (God in the flesh) was hurt by their rejection and passed judgment on the people. If the words of a true prophet always come true then what of the words of THEE Word of God? So however it happens, Messiah's words caused the desolation.

3) In Matthew 24, Messiah and His disciples are walking out of the temple as the disciples admire its structures, when Messiah says "You see all of this? Not one stone will be left standing". The disciples then asked him when it would happen and what will be the signs of His return and the end of the age.

----

So the Messiah's Olivet Discourse describes (a) the destruction/desolation of that Temple, (b) the punishment of the Jews, and (c) a summary of events to follow until He returns.

- The temple was always known as "The House", whether "The House of the Lord", or "The [Jews'] House of Worship". Messiah was in the house rebuking the Pharisees and His people in Matthew 23.

- At the end of Matthew 23, Messiah tells them that THEIR HOUSE, that temple, will be made desolate for rejecting Him.

- Now, if we reference Daniel 9:26-27 [KJV] it says:

And after [62 weeks] shall Messiah be cut off, but not for himself:

...and the people of the prince that shall come shall destroy the city and the sanctuary; and the end thereof shall be with a flood, and unto the end of the war desolations are determined.

27 And he shall confirm the covenant with many for one week: and in the midst of the week he shall cause the sacrifice and the oblation to cease, and for the overspreading of abominations he shall make it desolate, even until the consummation, and that determined shall be poured upon the desolate.


So Daniel 9:26-27 says:
- The Messiah will be cut off
- The city and Sanctuary (Temple) will be destroyed (by the people of the prince to come)
- He shall make it desolate (whoever "he" is)

And in Matthew 23:38-39 Messiah says:
- Your house (Temple) is now left desolate

....So, in hindsight from the Historicist POV, the Messiah is "He" who was prophesied to make The 2nd Temple desolate in Daniel 9:27 and history testifies to its desolation in 70 AD.

Desolation = Destruction. This is our context for Matthew 24:15.

----


4) Messiah lists several events that would begin before the destruction of the temple: Deception (false prophets), Wars, Famines, Pestilences (disease/death), and signs like Earthquakes in random places. These would start. Mark 13:1,6-8, and Luke 21:5,8-11 are additional witnesses testifying to the same Olivet Discourse listing these same events that were to begin before the Temple's desolation.

So we can synchronize all three gospels and let each fill in the missing pieces.


5) Messiah then tells the disciples that they were going to suffer, be persecuted, and killed before the destruction of the temple, but that through them the gospel will be preached to all the nations.

The Book of Acts is an account of the disciples spreading the gospels to all the nations of the known world while being persecuted and killed fulfilling this prediction. History records the martyrdom of the apostles (except for John) in the 1st century AD before 70 AD destruction.


6) In Matthew 24:15, Messiah then says "When you see the abomination of desolation standing in the holy place - as spoken by Daniel - GET OUT!" Mark 13:14 records Messiah saying, "When you see the abomination of desolation standing where it ought not - as spoken by Daniel - GET OUT!" But Luke 21:20 records Messiah saying, "When you see Jerusalem compassed with armies, then know that the desolation is near. GET OUT!"

- Desolation = Destruction, which we know happened in 70 AD.

- The temple's destruction was to involve an army surrounding and besieging Jerusalem.

- Something abominable must have stood in the holy place, where it ought not to be before the destruction of the temple.

So in my view, the Messiah is referring to the Roman army as the "abomination of desolation". It is that army entering into the holy city and onto the temple mount that is the "abomination" that eventually desolates the temple. Messiah references Daniel because the passages prophesy all AODs that were meant to occur starting when the daily sacrifice was first ended by Antiochus Epiphanes in 167 BC.

The priests were commanded to keep the fire of the altar continually burning and to offer a morning and evening lamb each day. This was not a sacrifice for sin, but an offering. But each time they were prevented from doing so it was considered "desolation".

Daniel 8:13
Then I heard one saint speaking, and another saint said unto that certain saint which spake, How long shall be the vision concerning the daily sacrifice, and the transgression of desolation, to give both the sanctuary and the host to be trodden under foot?


So, the Roman army, ending the daily sacrifice for good by destroying the temple completely, is the AOD. Once they begin to enter into the city (Luke 21:20) the people in the know were to flee.

The Timeframe of tribulation for the Jews begins.
See Here and Here
 

Dino246

Senior Member
Jun 30, 2015
24,733
13,406
113
#74
4. The abomination of desolation has yet to happen
Setting Daniel 9 aside for a moment, why then did the believers leave Jerusalem in 70 AD just prior to its destruction? How do you interpret these passages (which to many readers are blatantly obviously the same events)?

Luke 21:20b-22a “When you see Jerusalem being surrounded by armies, you will know that its desolation is near. Then let those who are in Judea flee to the mountains, let those in the city get out, and let those in the country not enter the city. For this is the time of punishment in fulfillment of all that has been written."

Matthew 24:15-16 “So when you see standing in the holy place ‘the abomination that causes desolation, spoken of through the prophet Daniel—let the reader understand—then let those who are in Judea flee to the mountains."
 

Everlasting-Grace

Well-known member
Dec 18, 2021
5,016
1,540
113
#75
Setting Daniel 9 aside for a moment, why then did the believers leave Jerusalem in 70 AD just prior to its destruction? How do you interpret these passages (which to many readers are blatantly obviously the same events)?

Luke 21:20b-22a “When you see Jerusalem being surrounded by armies, you will know that its desolation is near. Then let those who are in Judea flee to the mountains, let those in the city get out, and let those in the country not enter the city. For this is the time of punishment in fulfillment of all that has been written."

Matthew 24:15-16 “So when you see standing in the holy place ‘the abomination that causes desolation, spoken of through the prophet Daniel—let the reader understand—then let those who are in Judea flee to the mountains."
Look at these 2 passages, they speak of 2 different events.

again, 70 Ad was 40 years after the 69th Week. It would have been almost the 75th week.

There also was not abpmination of desolation in 70 AD.. They did not put an idol in the holy place rendering it unclean, they destroyed the temple..

all these things happen BEFORE the covenant for 1 week bu the future prince
 

TheDivineWatermark

Well-known member
Aug 3, 2018
10,230
1,981
113
#76
Setting Daniel 9 aside for a moment, why then did the believers leave Jerusalem in 70 AD just prior to its destruction? How do you interpret these passages (which to many readers are blatantly obviously the same events)?
Many do believe these are "the same events".

Many believe, instead, (as I do) that because of the "sequential issues" of the Olivet Discourse, that these are completely distinct events--completely distinct "SEE-then-FLEE" events, at completely distinct time-slots:
1) the one taking place in the events surrounding 70ad (which is covered in Lk21:12-24a,b [ending with "and they shall be led away captive into all the nations"]);
2) the other taking place far-future in the [yet future] 7-yr period leading up to Christ's Second Coming to the earth (and ending with their being "gathered"... "ONE by ONE," by angels, into one place upon the earth: "to worship the Lord in the holy mount, AT JERUSALEM")...


1) the wording in Lk21:12 indicates to the reader that this "SEE-then-FLEE" of the 70ad events must take place "[But] BEFORE ALL these" (i.e. BEFORE ALL these "beginning of birth pangs" that vv.8-11 had just described, being parallel to the same BoBPs spoken of in both Matt24:4-8 and Mk13:5-8);


2) the wording in Matthew 24, however, has that section starting out with "the beginning of birth pangs" (vv.4-8) and then other things FOLLOWING ON from there, one of which is that "SEE-then-FLEE" that takes place at a distinct time-slot, that is, at the MID-point of the future 7-yr period commonly called the Tribulation Period: in the years immediately preceding and leading up to Christ's Second Coming to the earth FOR the promised and prophesied earthly Millennial Kingdom (yet future)

Luke 21:20b-22a “When you see Jerusalem being surrounded by armies, you will know that its desolation is near. Then let those who are in Judea flee to the mountains, let those in the city get out, and let those in the country not enter the city. For this is the time of punishment in fulfillment of all that has been written."
Yes, this 70ad events pertains [also] to the "desolaTIONS are determined" (in the sequentially-written Dan9:24-27 time-prophecy)--"ye SEE Jerusalem compassed with armies, then KNOW that..." and "for there shall be great DISTRESS in the land, and WRATH upon this people"... parallel wording to what Jesus had said in Matt22:7 ("But when the king heard thereof, he was WROTH: and he sent forth his armies, and destroyed those murderers, and BURNED UP THEIR CITY")...

... AND with what HE had said on the very day that the 69 Weeks ("having to do" with "the city") were concluded, in His words of Lk19:41-44 (when He DID the Zech9:9 thing: "having to do" with "the city" also), where He said to Jerusalem, "IF thou hadst known..." and "but NOW they are hid from thine eyes" (consistent with the Romans 11:25 "a hardening [/blindness]... UNTIL"... and which passage's v.27 corresponds with both Dan9:24's wording as well as the wording in Isa27:9,12-13/Matt24:29-31--Second Coming to the earth passage [see below])

Matthew 24:15-16 “So when you see standing in the holy place ‘the abomination that causes desolation, spoken of through the prophet Daniel—let the reader understand—then let those who are in Judea flee to the mountains."
Again, this Matthew 24:15-16 passage comes (instead) sequentially AFTER the "beginning of birth pangs" of vv.4-8 (which BTW are equivalent the SEALS of Rev6 in the "things which must come to pass in quickness [noun]" section of Rev [1:1/1:19c/4:1], which is the lead-up to Christ's Second Coming to the earth, same as we see in Matt24:29-31/Isa27:9,12-13 ["GREAT trumpet"]--parallel also to the Dan9:24 -time-prophecy "having to do" with "the city" also);

...also the "AOD [singular, singular]" Jesus spoke of, can only be referring to the one in Dan12:11... and Daniel will be resurrected at the end of the days referred to in that text.

So the "sequence issues" of the Olivet Discourse has one set of "SEE-then-FLEE" taking place "BEFORE ALL" the beginning of birth pangs, whereas the other set comes AFTER the beginning of birth pangs, thus making them completely distinct.

Many folks either do not realize the words "BEFORE ALL THESE" in Lk21:12 refer back to vv.8-11 DESCRIBING the very things that Matt24:4-8/Mk13:5-8 START OUT with talking about, and thus miss the sequence issues, or they do not realize that Lk21:8-11 are speaking of the same "beginning of birth pangs" that Matt24:4-8/Mk13:5-8 speak of since they are only DESCRIBED here in Luke (not labeled), thus missing the "sequence" indicated by the "BEFORE ALL THESE" phrase in v.12 (etc...)







[for the readers: if Dan9:24-27 had said "[unto] the ANOINTING of the prince" then one could consider His baptism being the point in time being spoken of... but a careful reading of the text shows that it does not refer to His BEING anointed [an action] but rather IDENTIFIES Him: "the messiah the prince" ([unto] the anointed one, in other words--The text is not saying "unto the time he is 'anointed'," see)--The passages I point out in the above post DO "have to do" with "the city," which is what the time-prophecy of Dan9:24-27 is about... His baptism didn't, see; in other words, we're talkin' about His presentation at Jerusalem [Zech9:9], in what is commonly called the Triumphal Entry, when He SAID the Lk19:41-44 words (re: "the city / Jerusalem")]
 

rrcn

Active member
Oct 15, 2023
230
69
28
#77
Look at these 2 passages, they speak of 2 different events.

again, 70 Ad was 40 years after the 69th Week. It would have been almost the 75th week.

There also was not abpmination of desolation in 70 AD.. They did not put an idol in the holy place rendering it unclean, they destroyed the temple..

all these things happen BEFORE the covenant for 1 week bu the future prince
Who is the future prince that you referring to?
 

TheDivineWatermark

Well-known member
Aug 3, 2018
10,230
1,981
113
#78
Look at these 2 passages, they speak of 2 different events.

again, 70 Ad was 40 years after the 69th Week. It would have been almost the 75th week.
There also was not abpmination of desolation in 70 AD.. They did not put an idol in the holy place rendering it unclean, they destroyed the temple..
all these things happen BEFORE the covenant for 1 week bu the future prince
Right. (y)

You said much more succinctly what I am saying (in my Post #76, posted almost the same time): that the time-prophecy of Dan9:24-27 is WRITTEN SEQUENTIALLY; and that the Olivet Discourse also has SEQUENCE ISSUES that must be carefully noted.

:)
 

PennEd

Senior Member
Apr 22, 2013
12,966
8,672
113
#79
So there have been multiple threads debating this view, but I just wanted to share the reasons why many of us believe the prophecies of Daniel 9 have already been fulfilled.

For background and context, I take a Historicist view of eschatology which is the traditional view of the protestant reformers before the counter-reformation offered up the two opposing views of preterism and futurism (with futurism being the current view held by many modern Christians).

A quick and dirty summary of each:

- Preterism = All endtime prophecies were fulfilled in 70 AD. The Messiah is currently ruling on His throne.

- Historicism = Endtime prophecies are fulfilled progressively throughout human history, proving that God steers human events.

- Futurism = All endtime prophecies will be fulfilled in the future after a gap period called the church age.


So, generally speaking...

- Preterists take the position that the Messiah currently is ruling the world from His throne in heaven.

- Historicists take the position that we have been in the end times for the last 2k years; everything happening is laid out by God's end-time prophecies.

- Futurists take the position that after the church is raptured away, the clock will continue and the end times will begin.


As I mentioned, the traditional view of eschatology by the protestant reformers was Historicism and their argument was that the Almighty is sovereign, and proof of His sovereignty is knowing exactly what will happen from beginning to end. There is no scenario where He doesn't know, so any prophecy He shares - especially prophecy that principally involves time - will be a complete timeline of events.

For example, The Almighty gave King Nebuchadnezzar this dream in Daniel 2:

View attachment 258545

Everyone agrees that this was a visual representation of a timeline the Almighty gave to King Neb, starting with Babylon and ending with The Messiah's kingdom. So, it's a complete timeline of human history, with each section representing a world-ruling kingdom until the toes are smashed by the stone from heaven (Messiah).

- Babylon
- Medo-Persia
- Macedonia // Greece
- Rome
- 10 Smaller Mixed Kingdoms
- Messiah's Kingdom

And per the magnificence of the Almighty's imagery, even the characteristics we see from the statue were representative of the kingdoms that rule:

1) Gold was the economy of Babylon

2) There were two arms folded. Medo-Persia was a partnership of two kingdoms, and silver was their economy.

3) With Greece, humanity literally entered into the bronze age

4) The time of Rome was known as the Iron Age...and there were even two legs of the empire: The Byzantine Empire and the Western Roman Empire. Also, notice that this section is the longest section of the statue. And in fulfillment, The Roman Empire experienced by far the longest run.

5) Next, humanity reaches the ten toes which are a mix of clay and iron. Meanwhile, revelation speaks of ten smaller kingdoms prophesied to emerge in the end times. So if we follow the pattern that The Almighty has given, then the ten smaller kingdoms will have characteristics of the Roman Empire and characteristics of "Clay" (the original Hebrew word used was "Arab"). The ten smaller kingdoms will be mixtures of Roman and Arabic influences (Algebra or "Al' jabr ", the basis of math, being one example). Also, the prophecy says the iron/clay mixture never completely combines, meaning that the people of the ten kingdoms will never truly be unified.

NOTE: At no point was this statue described to break until the toes were smashed by the heavenly stone, representing an unbroken timeline of human history as we go from one kingdom age to the next until Messiah.

----

Now, as history will show, both preterism and futurism views were developed by the Catholic Church to counter historicism. The reason why historicism was countered was because the reformers began identifying the Catholic Church as The Great Harlot and the Papacy as the Beast of the Sea. So, during the counter-reformation, two newer views of eschatology began to spread. This brings us to Daniel 9.


Daniel 9

The preterist view holds that all of Daniel 9:24-27 (i.e., The 70 Weeks prophecy) was fulfilled in 70 AD, while the futurist view holds that only 69 weeks have been fulfilled followed by our current pause/break of an indetermate amount of time (never once mentioned to happen by The Almighty or Messiah or any angel), with the 70th week beginning the time of Great Tribulation after the break. If we were to lay out these views using King Neb's statue to represent the timeline each view would look like this:


Preterism - "Humanity is currently in the post-stone period called the kingdom of God, where Messiah rules from heaven."

View attachment 258551


Futurism - "Humanity is currently in a gap period called the Church Age, and will be raptured away before the end times begin."
View attachment 258549


Meanwhile, historicists believe that all 70 weeks were fulfilled in 70 AD, leading to the destruction of Jerusalem and the scattering of the people, (both of which are the "desolations" prophesied in Daniel 9:27), and that the land would be devoid of the people who are supposed to be there until the return of the Messiah when He establishes His eternal kingdom on earth. Historicists also believe that the Great Tribulation equates to the time in human history when the nations of the world collectively hated and persecuted the Jews as "murderers of Christ", spanning 1,260 years and directly involving the Papacy.

----

I think this is a good enough intro. Let me know if you have any questions.

Blessings.
There’s a whole lot more to support a dispensational view than Daniel 9.
Here’s just one.

This is what Jesus read when asked to read Scripture at the Synagogue:

Isaiah 61:
61 “The Spirit of the Lord God is upon Me,
Because the Lord has anointed Me
To preach good tidings to the poor;
He has sent Me to heal the brokenhearted,
To proclaim liberty to the captives,
And the opening of the prison to those who are bound;
2 To proclaim the acceptable year of the Lord.

He then told them this prophecy was fulfilled in their hearing.

Problem is, there’s no period after “acceptable year of the Lord”. There is a comma. Jesus stopped mid sentence. Thankfully!!!!
That comma has lasted over 2000 years.

Because the rest of the passage reads,

And the day of vengeance of our God;
To comfort all who mourn,
3 To console those who mourn in Zion,
To give them beauty for ashes,
The oil of joy for mourning,
The garment of praise for the spirit of heaviness;
That they may be called trees of righteousness,
The planting of the Lord, that He may be glorified.”
 

GaryA

Truth, Honesty, Love, Courage
Aug 10, 2019
9,120
3,974
113
mywebsite.us
#80
The believers headed for the mountains in 67 A.D. when they saw Jerusalem being surrounded by armies - not three years later after the siege when (or, just before) the desolation took place.