Proof That Catholics Worship Mary

Hold on hold on, slow down. The speed limit is 30MPH on residential neighborhoods. Buddhist? Muslims?
Do you have a question of Salvation here?

I don't know about Catholics but Salvation in the Orthodox Church is understood as Theois which is a long topic onto itself, but summarized it means that only God knows who goes to Heaven or Hell.

Yes, good point.
Q. Why do Catholics or Orthodox say 'The Mother of God"? God has no mother.
A. They refer to her as the "Mother of God" in the flesh, because obviously everyone knows that Mary is not God.

No. We’re just talking about Catholics. You mentioned that I shouldn’t talk about my fellow Christians that way, so I thought you were saying Catholics were Christians. If you weren’t, then I misunderstood. My bad.

Okay, so your comment here is tied to Salvation and the answer in the orthodox church is Theosis.
In other words, we're not very busy trying to categorize people as Christians or Heathens. God will do that.

Well, the religion itself is non-Christian. There are lots of other non-Christian religions.

I've heard many Christians say that once we're in Heaven we'll be surprised by who isn't there. I think we'll be much more surprised by who is there.

If any man eat of this bread, he shall live for ever; and the bread that I will give, is my flesh, for the life of the world.

He that eateth my flesh, and drinketh my blood, hath everlasting life: and I will raise him up in the last day.

And taking bread, he gave thanks, and broke; and gave to them, saying: This is my body, which is given for you. Do this for a commemoration of me.

Therefore whosoever shall eat this bread, or drink the chalice of the Lord unworthily, shall be guilty of the body and of the blood of the Lord.

I think i understand you better now.
So you can't even extend the grace to call someone Christian when they clearly worship Jesus Christ despite cultural interferences even when Jesus told you to extend the other cheek to a non believer who might even persecute you?
Is that what you're telling me here?

Mmm. What are we talking about here? I mean I have some Catholic friends who’ve gotten saved and come out of Catholicism. I’m not trying to call anyone names. Like I say, I didn’t mean to offend you. Are you Catholic? If so, I apologize.

...the command and tradition that Christ left us on His last supper to remember Him with all the significances of the verses on the last supper.

"You shall not make for yourself a carved image—any likeness of anything that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth; you shall not bow down to them nor serve them." Exodus 20:4-5

Whether you call it worship or veneration is irrelevant. When you make a carved image and bow the knee to it, God hates it.

A careful examination of "the sacrifice pf the Mass" shows that the RCC has gone completely rogue. We all know that Christ's "real presence" is always there in Spirit when real Christians have a real Remembrance Feast.

But the Catholic Church promotes the lie that (a) a priest must now "sacrifice" Christ (although it is a wafer) and (b) offer His blood as a part of the sacrifice. This in the face of what the Bible says, that the sacrifice of Christ was "ONE SACRIFICE FOR SINS FOREVER".

Here is what the New Advent Catholic Encyclopedia has to say:
Without attempting to state and establish a comprehensive theory of sacrifice, it will suffice to show that, according to the comparative history of religions, four things are necessary to a sacrifice:

• a sacrificial gift (res oblata),
• a sacrificing minister (minister legitimus),
• a sacrificial action (actio sacrificica), and
• a sacrificial end or object (finis sacrificii).

In contrast with sacrifices in the figurative or less proper sense, the sacrificial gift must exist in physical substance, and must be really or virtually destroyed (animals slain, libations poured out, other things rendered unfit for ordinary uses), or at least really transformed, at a fixed place of sacrifice (ara, altare), and offered up to God. As regards the person offering, it is not permitted that any and every individual should offer sacrifice on his own account.

In the revealed religion, as in nearly all heathen religions, only a qualified person (usually called priest, sacerdos, lereus), who has been given the power by commission or vocation, may offer up sacrifice in the name of the community. After Moses, the priests authorized by law in the Old Testament belonged to the tribe of Levi, and more especially to the house of Aaron (Hebrews 5:4).

But, since Christ Himself received and exercised His high priesthood, not by the arrogation of authority but in virtue of a Divine call, there is still greater need that priests who represent Him should receive power and authority through the Sacrament of Holy Orders to offer up the sublime Sacrifice of the New Law.

Sacrifice reaches its outward culmination in the sacrificial act, in which we have to distinguish between the proximate matter and the real form. The form lies, not in the real transformation or complete destruction of the sacrificial gift, but rather in its sacrificial oblation, in whatever way it may be transformed.

So by some sort of "magic" a wafer becomes "Christ". Can no one see the absurdity of this idea? And by some sort of "magic" a man receive the power to cause this transformation and offer up a "sacrifice". The OT priests would laugh at this.

Q. Why do the Catholics and Orthodox make the sign of the cross on their chest?
A. There's nothing more identifiable than this, to be a Christian and to say that the cross reminds us of Jesus' sacrifice and resurrection. It's spiritual armor basically. I do it constantly to show gratefulness and thankfulness to God for anything.
Before i eat, i make the cross and i say thank you for this meal. And i also do it for a hundred other things during the day.

To pray to Mary is an official doctrine of the RCC. Also, that she after the birth of Jesus still was a Virgin.

Why do Protestants assert that the Bible was never translated before the Deformation? Through a mixture of ignorance and bad faith.

I dont know. I bever claimed that. So far I know it was in europe first translatet from John Wyclif.