Search results

KJV1611 is neither my "buddy" or my enemy. I barely know what he thinks, except he is apparently a KJV Onlyist. I am not. I favor the ESV. The NASB, NKJV, or even the NIV are fine with me, for specific uses. In fact, I would have suspected that a KJV Onlyist might be a dispensationalist...

I'm not even sure what you are saying. Christ has already redeemed creation. The events that occur through the Millennium, if it is how dispensationalists conceive it, are not necessary toward accomplishing this redemption. I would like a more thorough explanation of what you are claiming.

The righteous dead are ruling with Christ now in heaven. These are the victorious saints. The rest of Christianity is now on earth, fighting against the forces of evil. These are the militant saints. Satan is restrained in the sense of being unable to prevent the gospel message from going...

Did you read the supporting arguments? I agree with Sam Storm's analysis, which is the typical amillennial position. 1 Corinthians 15 teaches that death is defeated at the resurrection. There is no room for death and evil men to continue past Jesus' return. Matthew 25 clearly teaches this...

Israel's presence in the land does not indicate dispensationalism is true. It could relate to the end-time evangelism that is occurring even now. Messianic Jews in Israel are evangelizing to non-believing Jews in Israel. Like I said, there is NOTHING within amillennialism that negates the...

You Notice, folks, that dispensationalists will continue to insist on "literalism" in order to perpetuate their doctrine, even if you point out issues. Notice that he did not address the issue with Dan and his omission, as well as breaking out Joseph separately from Manasseh. The account...

This is another dispensationalist lie. And you show who your father is, by telling such lies. Jesus is a Jew. No Christian hates Jesus. Therefore, no Christians hate Jews. Pretty simple logic. Also, knowledgeable Christians that believers are united with Christ, therefore they themselves...

What about Gentile believers now? Are they given this new heart of flesh, to replace their heart of stone, now? In other words, do you believe that Gentiles today are under the New Covenant?

I consider Separation theology, which is what dispensationalism is, to be a false teaching. Those who hold it do not properly understand union with Christ, and that is the fundamental cause of their false teaching. If they understood that the believer is legally and vitally united with Christ...

By the way, I am wondering if you are claiming that the New Covenant is not in effect now, and/or does not apply to Gentile believers. Biblical regeneration happens to all true believers. New believers receive a heart of flesh to replace their heart of stone at the moment of regeneration...

This is a dispensationalist interpretation. The "restoration of all things" is talking about the New Heavens and New Earth. Not a literal 1000 Year Millennium. The restoration is in the sense of the Garden of Eden. Read and compare Genesis 1-3 with Revelation 21-22. The parallels are CLEAR...

There is no failure in God's uncondtional promises to either Abraham or Israel. They were either fulfilled in Israel's time, or they are fulfilled in Christ, or they were not unconditional. And, all those who are joined to Jesus are Abraham's descendantes, because of the doctrine of union with...

Is there any conservative Christian author who promotes this view, though? Joseph Jacobs was Jewish in his faith. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_Jacobs Perhaps you are just saying that Jews prior to Christ were already teaching the Millennium. If that is true, then it certainly would...

I'm asking for a book title.

The real issue is this... Dispensationalists interpret Scripture through an Israel-centric interpretative grid. Covenant theology interprets Scripture through a Christocentric interpretative grid. That's the major source of their problem. Once Christ is supplanted as the central theme of...

Can you provide any references from recognized authors which support this view that dispensationalism is a Pharisee doctrine, and explains their position?

I'm not sure what you mean, but I wouldn't call premillennialists unsaved, only confused. Severely confused. Misled. I was premillennialist up until the last 3 years or so.

In regards to Jacob Prasch having good teaching..like I mentioned, he seems to be a rabid dispensationalist. Here's a pdf file with an article by Sam Storms that explains the problems with premillennialism, including dispensationalism, very well. i don't think the link I listed above works...

Here's a pdf file with an article by Sam Storms that explains the problems with premillennialism, including dispensationalism, very well. i don't think the link I listed above works. Sam is an amillennialist like myself. He used to be a dispensationalist. He has written a book "Kingdom Come...

Here's a pdf file with an article by Sam Storms that explains the problems with premillennialism, including dispensationalism, very well. i don't think the link I listed above works. Sam is an amillennialist like myself. He used to be a dispensationalist. He has written a book "Kingdom Come...