Search results

Here's a pdf file with an article by Sam Storms that explains the problems with premillennialism, including dispensationalism, very well. i don't think the link I listed above works. Sam is an amillennialist like myself. He used to be a dispensationalist. He has written a book "Kingdom Come...

I don't know about that, but premillennialism is a defective teaching. We can't have death after Jesus returns. At the resurrection, death is defeated, and this occurs when he returns. Also, it's a fundamental problem with relation to the doctrine of union with Christ, claiming that Jews...

Here's a pdf file with an article by Sam Storms that explains the problems with premillennialism, including dispensationalism, very well. i don't think the link I listed above works. Sam is an amillennialist like myself. He used to be a dispensationalist. He has written a book "Kingdom Come...

https://www.thegospelcoalition.org/blogs/justin-taylor/what-you-must-believe-if-you-are-a-premillennialist/

would recommend the book, A Case for Amillennialism, by Kim Riddlebarger, for a good understanding on this topic. Dispensationalists are not even aware that there are other options, for the most part. Here's what you must believe as a dispensationalist: You must necessarily believe that...

would recommend the book, A Case for Amillennialism, by Kim Riddlebarger, for a good understanding on this topic. Dispensationalists are not even aware that there are other options, for the most part. Here's what you must believe as a dispensationalist: You must necessarily believe that...

would recommend the book, A Case for Amillennialism, by Kim Riddlebarger, for a good understanding on this topic. Dispensationalists are not even aware that there are other options, for the most part. Here's what you must believe as a dispensationalist: You must necessarily believe that...

would recommend the book, A Case for Amillennialism, by Kim Riddlebarger, for a good understanding on this topic. Dispensationalists are not even aware that there are other options, for the most part. Here's what you must believe as a dispensationalist: You must necessarily believe that...

If he's a dispensationalist, I disagree with him on MAJOR POINTS. And, I believe he is a rabid dispensatonalist. He may be able to explain their worldview, but it is not a true worldview. Similar to the Armstrongism I was indoctrinated in, it seemed logical but it was not. I would recommend...

Corrected version has this addition: And, by extension, this would include all believers. It would be very problematic to claim otherwise, as you'd have to question every NT letter whether it applies to all believers or just the specific addressees...

There isn't much difference between the two. Predestination is a generic term, as it can refer to either persons or events, and is not exclusively referring to persons, or, in the case of ancient Israel, a nation. For example, Christ was predestined to die for the elect. Notice this...

No, I don't have an issue with someone expressing their opinion. They can disagree with me if they want. Alistair Begg is an excellent teacher, though.

Here's exactly what I said, which kaylagirl heavily edited in order to slander me: I am a continuationist but: 1. I think most charismatics are fake, ignorant, self-deceived, mentally or emotionally ill, or lying, and lack credibility. 2. I don't think most "tongues-speakers" really exercise...

Here's exactly what I said, which kaylagirl heavily edited in order to slander me: I am a continuationist but: 1. I think most charismatics are fake, ignorant, self-deceived, mentally or emotionally ill, or lying, and lack credibility. 2. I don't think most "tongues-speakers" really exercise...

I encourage folks to go back to the original post, and see how kaylagirl has only quoted part of what I said, in an attempt to discredit me. She did not include qualifying statements that I made, intentionally. Additionally, notice how she is accusing me of being judgmental, and she herself...

I like Alistair Begg and said nothing against him.

I haven't even looked, because it doesn't prove your point.. which is basically to deny that God elects individuals to salvation. And this is a plainly biblical teaching.

Why? That forces me to assume your categories. Like I said, there is no meaningful difference between election and predestination. Predestination is a wider category that encompasses more than just salvation. Election is more specifically related to salvation, but can be used in other...

He predestines them to be in Christ, which is basically the same thing as election. This is where you are trying to derail biblical election and predestination. Your view is basically the teaching of Karl Barth...corporate election. Karl Barth was an immoral man who denied the full...