Search results

That would be changing tracks. Anyone can read up on what visualisation in New Age terms means and see for themselves that it's a no-go for christians. Yes, the red flag is up.

You're right. "Visualization" is pretty much a New Age expression. And the red flag is up warning for such tendencies.

Let alone this belief in the almighty free will choice of sinners.

You do make a difference between the unregenerate and regenerate man do you? The have totally opposite characteristics.

Do you believe that this "free choice" belongs equally to natural unregenerate man as well as to spiritual regenerate man?

Some things may seem to add up or even do add up with scripture in Book of Enoch, however I'd caution against these Book of Enoch versions that are out there. Not even sure about if the ethiopian Ge'ez always is very reliable.

Well, enjoy. It's a no-go land for me.

A squid eating dough in a polyethylene bag is fast and bulbous. Got me? (Capt. Beefheart).

As far as I can recall there were some Jesuit(?) clergy, Ribera and Lacunza, involved in some sort of proto version of dispensationalism prior to Darby and Scofield. More tolerant attitude to jews I think had been worked on in protestantism long before Scofield. Dispensationalism was perhaps a...

Feelings and endorphins can cause a lot of odd doctrines to be adopted.

I second that Q.

What is that "working of error" and who are able to "choose to be faithful to God", as you see it?

"The Prophet, Seer and Revelator" said KJV. :)

Yet you do not have your scriptures harmonize to other scriptures and you read them out of context and also read in things in them that are not there. Thus you still argue with the Word of God. Scripture-quoting is not enough evidence that one has sound doctrine. You are already gainsaying Eph.2...

Let's rest with that then.

I would not the see the "L" as equaling anybody being "predestined" to damnation.

Yes? Does that verse imply that Paul was using his "free-will" to get saved? Nope. But some ignorant people want to read that into scripture. God indeed transforms or translates sinners from their lost state to a saved state. That's God's work, not the work of the sinner. Again, you are...

And this does not imply "free will" for the sinner. Absolutely only a regenerate man want to accept this. Natural man indeed cannot or do not want to do this, since that is just foolishness to him and he is at enmity with God. Only the regenerate can have saving faith. Man's own beliefs cannot...

Then you do argue with the Word of God (not me). You read scripture out of context. All instances in scripture where God calls for a free will choice, the addressee of these callings are God's people (not natural, fallen men). You are deceived by the free-willers false teaching against the Word...

Amillenialism does solve a lot of problems, doesn't it?