Search results

This merely shows you have not done your proper homework on this topic, friend. Here is my Acts 12:4 KJV Apologetic: The word "Easter" in Acts 12:4 in the KJV is a four part explanation (Which involves proper study or resources to investigate such truths to see). I. The English word...

Because you are against the foundation of the faith (i.e., the Bible, the KJV). You are for shape shifting Bibles and scholars, and not any real settled text that God has preserved for today. And Jesus was worshiped by others. That does not mean we should be worshiped in the same way. While...

We do need to have the right commands, too. Modern Bibles even change some of God's commands. 2 Timothy 2:15 is one such command that is changed. Do you study to shew yourself approved unto God? Or do you follow the Modern Bibles alteration on this verse? ...

But if God is preserved His Word by His divine hand (Which lines up with what His Word says), then what you propose is only for the human corrupted texts out there and not God's incorruptible Word (1 Peter 1:23). After all, Scripture cannot be broken (John 10:35). Do you believe these things...

Common sense. When you see things changed for the worse and not for the better, you start to see a pattern and begin to understand. This should not be a surprise. Are you even aware that Unitarians and Catholics are a part of your Modern Bible Movement? Most likely you have no clue of all...

Based on German Rationalism. There is no special spiritual consideration taken into account. No prayer, no fasting, and no care that there really will ever be a settled text at any point. The committee of Modern scholars is built upon others like Catholics and Unitarians, as well. Is that...

Again, such ad hominem attacks really does not mean anything. Show me evidence your belief has any kind of backing in the Bible or has superior doctrine to the KJV. Make me a believer in Textual Criticism. How is a shape shifting text superior than a settled text? Insults are not becoming of...

Again, I can equally say that about your view. You have Modern Scholarship-Only tunnel vision which prevents you from seeing. This platitudes really do not mean anything unless you have evidence to back up your position. I have 150 Reasons to believe the KJV is the perfect Word of God for...

Not at all. One text has tons of missing verses and changed doctrines. So either you are unknowledgeable on this topic, or you are simply not being honest with yourself about the changes. I say this because I have discovered many very concerning differences. Do you care to discuss them? ....

But follow the basic logic of the idea. Can you really say the Modern Bible Movement is superior with it being fundamentally based on the scholar instead of what the Scriptures say? There is no absolute truth in the concept or idea within the Modern Bible Movement. Like the shifting sands, it...

Obviously nobody likes to be treated as a cold and in a harsh way (Which is the opposite of warm and fuzzy). Not sure why people get all worked up about our believing what the Bible plainly says about itself. ... ....

There are good scribes and bad scribes mentioned in the Bible. Obviously we can tell the good apples from the bad ones. How? Well, we look at the evidence. We look at the fruit. We look at the texts. We look at the differences of doctrine. We look to see the good or bad impact between one...

He has not been warm and fuzzy with me so far. Its why I did not respond to his other previous posts a little while back. So, I would have to respectfully say, I agree to disagree. May God bless you. ....

No, they are not. Modern Bibles teach false doctrines in over 50 plus places. The Bible talks about believers whereby Jesus says He never knew them, too. Granted, I am not saying all non-KJV believers fit this mold or anything. There are heretical KJV advocates out there. But what I know...

And the Westcott and. Hort Movement (or sect) today is still always pushing its unbiblical philosophy of error-ridden Bibles and manuscripts, whereby the Scholar (priest) becomes the real authority and not Scripture. ....

So you are saying that there is no financial equivalents exist between one country vs. another? And my answer was the Scripture verse I gave you. Can you read? Anyway, it seems you are very hostile. Do you truly want to be fair in this discussion and be open to hearing points from the other...

An exciting interview happening soon hopefully (For those who are in defense of the KJV):

An atheist might attack the resurrection by pointing out things from a natural man's perspective. Ultimately, it requires faith in your Bible when it speaks of the resurrection (which I am sure you believe). Similarly, you must approach the issue of the Bible itself with faith in the Bible. Does...

So those who have fallen away when they learned of such a false Science are to be ignored? I believe it is the bad fruit of Textual Criticism. Which pretty much sums up the scholarly Modern Bible Movement today. So you don't believe the verse in Acts I quoted to you? ...

As you know, Matthew 10:29 provides the answer to the question you asked. However, I can't help but feel this is just a lead-in to attack the King James Bible. Yes, the KJV does occasionally employ dynamic equivalence to convey clarity to the reader rather than expecting them to navigate foreign...