Search results

No. Your nonresponses are not going to fly. Go back and look at the evidences that are staring you in the face in regard to how the Modern Bible Movement today is still the Westcott and Hort Movement. Also, you are the new kids on the block because 413 years of the KJV does not compare to 143...

Funny. You used a spin-off of a Republican line—very clever! But two can play at that game. If I turn the tables, I might say you have a case of "Simple Bible-Believing Derangement Syndrome" or even "No Settled Text Derangement Syndrome." I say this because the Bible itself teaches that God's...

I am saying that a Christian who doubts or does not know where God’s precise and perfect words are is like an agnostic who doubts the existence of God. You do not know where all the words of God are; I do. ....

Well, that does not line up with the facts or evidence I have researched. As you may know, Bruce Metzger is probably the most influential textual critic. “The International committee that produced the United Bible Societies’ Greek New Testament, NOT ONLY ADOPTED THE WESTCOTT AND HORT EDITION...

Bible agnostic is not meant to be a mindless pitchfork mob insult. I do care for you in Christ. The term is merely an accurate description to let others know of the dangers of the Modern Bible Movement (or the Westcott and Hort Movement). Agnosticism, (from Greek agnōstos, “unknowable”)...

No mystery if you have an internet connection and you are a truth seeker. But you like the liberal approach to God’s Word. This is what makes it difficult for you to accept and understand. ...

This would be the New World Translation (NWT). ....

Would you be open to seeing the 15 Biblical Reasons I have for believing in a perfect (singular) preserved Word of God for today? Seems like you got cut off here. What are you trying to say? What gig? Believing in the KJV is not like working at a temporary free lance job. It is simply...

Actually, many Christians have fell away from the faith when they learned of the false Science of Textual Criticism in Bible colleges. This is silly. Theology is the study of the things of God. This would be connected to the Bible. Jesus said to the Father in John 17:17 that His Word is...

You are not making any sense. What you said here does not refute my statement that the Modern Bible Movement (or the Westcott and Hort Movement) is relatively new compared to the reign of the King James Bible. ...

This so very democratic Left of you. Instead of reading my point in context, you decided to gaslight me. Any time you want to apologize, please feel free. Right, the KJV is the narrow path. Most Christians in English-speaking countries today believe in shape shifter Bibles that are full of...

The Bibliology topic does involve the Bible. I have found numerous verses that talk about how we would have a perfect and preserved (singular) Word for today. ....

Errors in the Bible only exist for Bible agnostics. ,,,,

Not at all. Counting from Tyndale's Translation (1526) to the 1611, we have 85 years. Counting when the KJV became popular in the mid 1660s, this would be about 139 years. So we had the KJV for 413 years. The Modern Bible Movement (1881) origins has been about 143 years. However, for decades...

As are you. What is truth? (John 18:38). Jesus says to the Father, "Sanctify them through thy truth: thy word is truth." (John 17:17). Daniel 10:21 mentions the Scripture of truth. Most Original Onlyist Christians today do not believe that there is no “Scripture of truth” today. They believe...

@Dino246 Meant to add: "....The Vaticanus and Sinaiticus teach obvious false doctrines." ....

Also, by this statement you are for Revisionist history. The KJV is more than just some mere translation. It has had an impact unlike any other book for hundreds of years and led to three of the greatest revivals. Its idioms have become a part of English-speaking countries to both believers...

Your missing the point. Like a murder case, we build our case on evidence. We look for patterns of evidence to build our case. What I am showing you here is just one of many evidences that makes things obvious to the simple man of faith. ...

Please explain how his point is rational. The previous TR Bibles before the KJV were only around in the 1500s and not hundreds of years prior. They also did not have the same level of influence and or good fruit like the KJV, either. The Modern Bible Movement that came about today is more...

Did you take the time to examine the verses in Modern Bibles that promote pride? Or are you just solely bent on selling a narrative? .... ....