Search results

I post scripture of Jesus speaking and you call it nonsense? That can't be a good thing. If you want to reject Enoch that's fine. If you reject what Jesus simply stated, that is also fine. John 12 47 And if any man hear my words, and believe not, I judge him not: for I came not to judge the...

I guess that means you are afraid to address and discuss the posts of scriptures that say all men are saved. That's ok. Run off with your tail between your legs.

One of a kind is "only" And since it is speaking of begotten, "only begotten" He is the only begotten Son of God. Would that bother you if it was translated properly?

Why would you want me to explain what Jesus and the disciples said? I could only repeat what is says. It is simply stated. It has only one meaning. You see simply stated verses stating all peoples are saved as saying something different? That is sad for you because until the binders are...

So do the JW's Not with them either So did the disciples and first Church Yep, Im with them . I posted some scripture that does not need defining. It is simply stated and can have only one meaning. Do you actually need an explanation?

Ok I see that now. But still... looks you yelling. Caps do that.

And no matter how you try to twist the definitions of the words in the posts I submitted abut all peoples being saved, they say simply what they say and can not be denied. Rejected. But not denied. Its simply stated.

As for the op subject, It is pretty obvious that we are on the same page. No need to bicker over words definitions. Im a person. A human being. Calling God and Jesus beings is nothing to get all upset over. We were made in His image. A person is a type of being. So is God. So is an...

Here are some more verses Bluto You do believe these verses now that you have seen them, right Bluto? : ) 1 Tim 2:3-6 3 For this is good and acceptable in the sight of God our Savior; 4 Who will have all men to be saved, and to come unto the knowledge of the truth. 5 For there is one God, and...

Are you yelling at him with those caps. There is a more civil way to come to a dialog with someone.

" I already explained this above and you darn well better believe this stuff is extremely important. What do you mean by saying many important things are ignored? What things? And where did you get the idea that "all peoples are saved?" You say you mainly study that the most." Really, from who...

You are kind of hard to talk to. But I will assume you know they are actually two separate persons. So why continue. The thread is about if Jesus is the Father. And you agreed he is not. Dispute settled. Just to clarify my stance Yes, He is the Creator of this place. When I pray to the...

You seem to be a little demanding in your requests. First you admit by scripture that Jesus came to do the Fathers will as so said Himself. I have not come to do my will, but the will of the Father who sent me. Do you agree He by saying that is saying they are two separate beings? Or all you...

Your first question. God sent His Son. Is that really hard to understand. Father. Son. God/Son of God. Two separate entities though never separated except at the cross when the Father had to turn away briefly. Father, why has thou forsaken me. 2nd question He was initially born of the...

He also said, By keeping those two commandments, you keep them all..

My Lord "and" my God. He was a man that was born of the Spirit. That is why He is the only begotten Son. Yet he is a man. And because He existed before He was born a man, does not make Him God. But God was with Him always. So when He was there, God was there. Why does thou call me Good...

Dumber? He who calls one a fool is in danger of what?? Yet the Bible says a fool rejects God. It can say it. For it judges righteously. You have no right or authority to judge anyone or the Bible. Every time I come here I see easy subjects beat to death with bickering of those who have not...

You said the word destruction is not defined as I have shown in the dictionary. That it is defined differently in Stongs Concordance. You then post its definition. Strong's Concordance apóleia: destruction, loss The first definition of apóleia is destruction. You can say all you want but...

Which verse that I posted are you referencing?

You must have posted in the wrong thread by mistake. I am trying to spark discussion about the verses I posted and what they actually mean when properly defined. I have a few questions about your post. What is the Wordf? What is "the near text"? Who is Godn? Who is hIM? How can one judge...