Search results

The thing is accurate doctrine is essential, otherwise church devolves into this fake, worldly Christian love that we see all around us (at least I see it). Accurate doctrine will burn away that superficiality and wordliness if it is taught and practiced., but unfortunately, some mixture of true...

Paul uses the term flesh interchangeably to refer to both the body and the old man depending upon the context.

I disagree. Paul wouldn't tell believers to put the old man off if he didn't still exist.

Inheritance was more than money. As examples, Isaac, Jacob and Joseph all inherited the promises of GOD from their fathers. That was spiritual inheritance.

Inheritance in the bible comes through the father, not the mother.

The weekly sabbath is not even mentioned in verse 9. The word is sabbatismos, which means the keeping of a sabbath. It's verb form is used in the LXX to refer to keeping festivals, land sabbaths and the weekly sabbath. There is no specificity in verse 9.

LOL you just don't have a clue what Genesis 3:15 says. Christ is the woman's seed; he didn't come from her "seed".

He explains it well.

Tithing seemed like the #1 commandment to him. That and the fact that he included in his last post (which they deleted) his email address and a note for interested persons to contact him make me think he had ulterior motives.

So sad that you only know how to do superficial exegesis. The Greek word pas doesn't of necessity mean every, but you think it does. So sad. So superficial.

How do you know he was banned? I thought he gave up and left.

"Original sin" is explained in Romans 5:12. Adam's sin caused death (both spiritual and physical) to pass to all of his offspring, who are all born spiritually dead. Spiritually dead people cannot perfectly do the will of GOD, so at some point they will all sin. Because of this, just as sin...

I just checked and the word law is not in the phrase "a law of works"; it simply says "Of works?" The word law was added by the translator. So again, the word law does appear in Paul's writings without referring specifically to the law of Moses. In Romans 3:27 he's simply asking "through what...

That's not true. Romans 3:27 mentions law in a general sense by asking what kind of law. It has nothing to do with the law of Moses. Where then is the boasting? It was excluded. Through what kind of law? A law of works? No, but through a law of faith. Romans 3:27

Yes, it's extraordinary how translations can change the entire meanings of passages.

In Romans 3:31, in addition to there not being definite articles before the words law, there is a definite article before the word faith, i.e., the faith. So that verse says , as I read it, that we do not make law useless through the faith (i.e., the doctrine of Christ and his apostles), but we...

He's a troll that just wants to jerk your chain. A rock can interpret scripture better than he can.

You're thinking about Star Wars universalism. Universalism doesn't require belief that satan will be saved. Stop misrepresenting things.

Yeah you go ahead and pat yourself on the back. While you do that stand in front of a mirror so you'll have someone that agrees with you. And if you put a mirror behind you you'll have a whole crowd patting you on the back.

You haven't heard back from me because you're a complete waste of time. Having a discussion with you is like trying to reason with a donkey. You completely misrepresent what those fellows say in that AOG systematic theology book.