Search results

Once again you've collapsed justification & sanctification into the same category, which eliminates justification entirely & in doing so, your position ends up denying the Holy Spirit’s ability to save at all. If salvation ultimately depends on the believer's performance, then a person is only...

Scripture teaches that God the Son is the One who baptizes the believer with the Holy Spirit (Matt 3:11 & John 1:33) & the Spirit He gives is the ""forever‑indwelling"" Helper Jesus promised: He will be with you forever (Jn 14:16–17). This Spirit‑baptism is the moment of new birth &...

Your reply treats SEALED as reversible, which is the opposite of Paul's usage, collapses justification & sanctification into 1 category, redefines BELIEVES (present tense) as ""believes & keeps believing"", which Jesus never says & your ""jump out of the Father's hand"" argument (as if He can't...

The key point of our difference is Jesus' Holy Spirit baptism. The key point of our difference is Jesus' Holy Spirit baptism. You never addressed Jesus eternal life SEAL, the FOREVER indwelling (Jn 14:16) Holy Spirit. This seal declares God's ownership, certifies God's security & it...

Passover/Pesach begins before sundown on Wed Apr 1, 2026 & ends after nightfall on Apr 9, 2026 Passover week: Christ triumphal occurs on Nisan 10 (the day the Passover lamb is chosen, see Lev 23:3 below), Christ is killed on Nisan 14 (see Lev 23:6 below). 3 day's later He's resurrected. Lev...

I understand you're not seeking debate, but your position effectively places perseverance inside the act of salvation itself & that's where I firmly disagree. Nothing I wrote suggested that God forces anyone to believe or forces anyone to do anything. In fact, I emphasized the opposite...

A different salvation perspevtive Anyone interested in civil debate I'm willing to engage. Jesus calls the Father God (Jn 20:17, Matt 27:46 & Jn 17:3), the Father calls the Son God (Heb 1:8-9) & Paul calls the Son God (Rom 9:5) & Peter calls Holy Spirit God (Acts 5:3–4). The Human Condition...

A new perspective - Loss of Salvation Thread I'm no loner going to argue Greek words or respond to 50‑verse carpet bombings just to be personally attacked. Here is a Scripture‑based answer to the OP. Anyone interested in civil debate based on the English translations. I'm willing to engage...

You say I shifted to Rom 1, but you never addressed Hebs 3 at all. You didn't touch the author's use of 2 different nouns - ἀπείθεια in Vs.18 & ἀπιστία in Vs.19. That's the one passage that collapses your faith‑obedience fusion, & everyone following can see you won't go near it despite 3...

You say I shifted to Rom 1, but you never addressed Hebs 3 at all. You didn't touch the author's use of 2 different nouns - ἀπείθεια in Vs.18 & ἀπιστία in Vs.19. That's the one passage that collapses your faith‑obedience fusion, & everyone following can see you won't go near it despite 3...

Posting Strong's numbers isn't an argument. Strong's is a glossary, not a grammar & it doesn't make apeitheia & apistia identical - it actually confirms they're 2 different nouns with 2 different meanings. That's the point you still haven't addressed. You also haven't shown from Heb 3:18-19 why...

You admitted you shrink the battlefield (everyone following this see's that clearly), but you still haven't addressed any of the points that collapse your faith‑obedience fusion. You haven't shown from the text or the grammar that a genitive with 2 distinct nouns can mean definitional identity...

My argument doesn't stand or fall on who I've read or what tools I use. It stands or falls on the text. Paul uses 2 different nouns—hypakoē & pistis-in a genitive construction & elsewhere explicitly contrasts faith & works (Rom 4:5). You can question my sources all day, but that doesn't change...

Let me help anyone following. When you can’t answer the argument, you shrink the battlefield. You're trying to isolate Heb 3:12 because you know if you have to deal with the full picture - Heb 3:18–19 (2 different nouns), Rom 4:5 (faith vs. works), Jn 8:24 (unbelief dooms), Eph 1:13–14 (sealed...

What you 2 are calling ""absurdity"" is just the unavoidable result of keeping Paul's categories intact. You're trying to solve the tension by redefining faith into ""faith‑obedience,"" that's not exegesis, that's merging 2 different nouns, 2 different categories & 2 different functions. Paul...

You're mixing categories the NT keeps distinct. James, Paul, Jesus & the writer of Heb all use faith, works, obedience, fruit, sanctification & justification in different ways for different purposes. When you collapse them, you end up with a salvation that depends on human performance instead of...

Well, appealing to translator footnotes doesn't overturn Paul's grammar or his argument. A genitive construction with 2 different nouns-hypakoē (obedience) & pistis (faith)-cannot mean definitional identity. If Paul meant ""obedience is faith,"" he would not place 2 distinct nouns in a source...

Parallel descriptions don't erase the author's logic. Hebs 3 uses multiple terms rebellion, sin, hardness, disobedience, to describe Israel's departure, but the writer still distinguishes the root from the expressions. That's why he ends with 2 different summary words: apeitheia (disobedience)...

You're taking passages about sanctification (Rom 6), discipleship (Matt 5) & kingdom ethics (Matt 7) & using them to redefine justification. Scripture doesn't do that. Paul never does that. Jesus never does that. The categories stay distinct. Romans 6 is not Paul warning believers they might...

Sin has dominion over a person until faith & the indwelling Holy Spirit sanctifying work, not until obedience. Acts 11:18 says God GRANTED the Gentiles repentance unto life, the Holy Spirit is the GRANT, the GIFT, not a human achievement & 1 Jn 1:8 makes it clear that anyone who thinks they...