Search results for query: 70th

...a distinction in the timing between "our Rapture" and "Christ's Second Coming"... ... whereas Darby came to perceive a "pre-TRIB [or pre-70th Week]" rapture; ...and M. MacDonald, in her supposed "vision" described a "POST-trib" rapture (with the Church GOING THROUGH the Trib yrs). Their...

YES! The "69 Weeks" [total, to that point] were concluded on this very day ^ ... ... the day when Jesus SAID the Lk19:41-44 thing [read it] and DID the Zech 9:9 thing... BOTH having to do with "the city" / "Jerusalem" (i.e. the Dan9:24 time-prophecy... ["... are determined upon THY [Daniel's]...

...kicks-off "the Day of the Lord" [1Th5:1-3] is what will THEN unfold upon the earth, i.e. what we commonly call the 7-yr Tribulation Period, or 70th Week... the "in quickness [noun]" time period Rev1:1/1:19c/4:1 speaks of); So yes, the Rapture PRECEDES that future, specific, LIMITED...

This is fairly how I see it, as well. --Romans 9:26, speaking of Israel, says, "And it SHALL COME TO PASS, that in the place where it was SAID UNTO THEM, Ye are not my people [lo ammi]; there shall they be called the children of the living God." [Hos1:10-11]; --Romans 9:25, speaking of...

...term it: --aka the "in quickness [noun]" time-period per Rev1:1/1:19c/4:1 [speaking of the "future" aspects of Rev [chpts 4-5,]6-19]; --aka the "70th Week" per Dan9:27a,b,c[,26b]; --aka Dan11:36 thru 12:13,12; --aka 2Th2:3b-9a [and many verses in chpt 1], and 1Th5:1-3's reference to its...

...PORTION of the 7-yr period--aka "the BEGINNING of birth PANGS"--AS THE FIRST PART OF what we commonly call the [entire] "tribulation period" / 70th Week... THESE "BoBPs / SEALS" lasting close to 1.5 to nearly 2 yrs, something like that--all being WITHIN the "in quickness [noun]" time-period...

..."of-lengthy-duration" things which v.24 had just covered (including its own "UNTIL" matter) ALL of these "sequence" issues require that the "70th Week" not have immediately followed the conclusion of the 69 Weeks (concluded on what we call Palm Sunday), nor to have taken place in the...

...= "judgment / trial / testing" (and that's exactly what Rev6-19 is talking about (what we commonly call the 7-yr Tribulation Period, aka the "70th Week" of Daniel [Dan9:27a(,26b)]]); example: see the wording in Rev3:10 "... I also will keep thee from the hour of TESTING [/TEMPTATION /...

...when does the tribulation start?" What we commonly term "the Tribulation Period" (consisting of "7 360-day years" or "2520 days," aka the "70th Week") will START at what is talked about in the following passages: --"Seal #1" - the rider on the white horse with a "BOW" (i.e. "deception")...

...[future] reign on the earth" and all this is stated BEFORE Jesus will open the first seal that kicks off the 7-year tribulation period (i.e the 70th Week; 2520 days leading up to His Second Coming to the earth), the initial moment of the tribulation period being the ARRIVAL of "the DOTL" with...

...UP THERE... and the "UNIONed-with [G4862] Him" thing had already taken place WAY BACK AT THE RAPTURE point in the chronology, PRE-trib / PRE-70th Wk ("and so [/in this manner] shall we ever be WITH / UNIONed-with the Lord")--not clear at the END of the Trib time-period at this Rev19...

As I see the text, it states: --"confirm [/strengthen] a covenant" (likely ['strengthening'] one having already been in existence, "strengthening" it, i.e. putting it into effect) --"with the many" (I can't say whether this "WITH" means "ALONG WITH" [as though all participants are doing same...

and do you believe that time-period is YET FUTURE? Paul states that "the day of the Lord" ARRIVES "exactly like [hosper]" the INITIAL "birth PANG [SINGULAR]" that COMES UPON a woman... and so Jesus had spoken of them [in the PLURAL], and the FIRST ONE He spoke of is (as I'd pointed out)...

@GaryA is not saying the crucifixion was in 34ad... He is saying that the 70th week started at His baptism (which has nothing to do with "[determined upon...] thy [Daniel's] holy city" like the actual conclusion of the 69 Weeks [7+62 total] DOES have to do with!! (Zech9:9/Lk19:41-44, etc)]... so...

I think GaryA said "in 34ad" (if memory serves). I disagree, of course. = )

Let the readers consider what I'd put in my Post #461 and Post #462 (different thread) about the SEQUENTIAL nature of the Dan9:24-27 prophecy (which pertains to "thy [Daniel's] people" and "thy [Daniel's] holy city" and what points those CONNECT to, elsewhere in Scripture): Post #461 -...

[I added an underlining] I'm delighted to see that you've underlined the word "SO THAT"... which I see (instead) as connecting back to the specific words saying "who [identifying] OPPOSES AND EXALTS HIMSELF above all that is called God or that is worshipped"... which points us back to the...

...about ("the day of the Lord" earthly-located time-period, first aspect ["IN THE NIGHT"], aka what we call "the 7-yr Tribulation Period, or the "70th Week" of Daniel, or the time of Jacob's Trouble... the "IN HIS TIME" of the man of sin, 2Th2:6,8a,9a "whose COMING / ADVENT / ARRIVAL / PRESENCE...

...and LEAD UP TO His Second Coming to the earth, Rev19; This "future" aspect of the Book of Rev IS the "7 year period" [2520 days], aka Daniel's 70th "Week"); --a "searching judgment" has already taken place as indicated by the word "WAS FOUND" (in 5:4), which same word is used re: Paul when...

...people of Israel... NOT SO [Pre-tribbers DO NOT believe that!]... These "elect" will have come to faith in Christ DURING the Trib yrs... that's part of the PURPOSE of the Tribulation period, aka the 70th Week of Daniel; AFTER the Trib (for them to [supposedly] come to faith [THEN]) IS TOO LATE!!]