Search results

  1. PAC-fit

    Baptism of Chaff

    "all understanding" *
  2. PAC-fit

    Baptism of Chaff

    Nothing surprises me with that, why wouldn't the V-4 Minister apply to such? If anything I said in the OP was complex, I wouldn't hesitate to discuss whatever. But it isn't complex. That's just cover for wanting to forget about it, altogether. God himself is where "all understand" originates...
  3. PAC-fit

    Baptism of Chaff

    If by some strange occurrence, which is quite possible, something did align with television's vast body of work, I can assure you I did no such thing. You're right, I should have spent some time and informed myself on how little or much "corruption" is commonly held in this forum. Then again...
  4. PAC-fit

    GOP Swamp ‘Spirituality’

    From the day, businessman Donald Trump came down the escalator to announce his White House bid, say what you will, soon stepped into a collaboration of his own personal gallery of insincere backstabbers. Not just any RINOS, but world-class who dance wonderfully to the glee of the far-left...
  5. PAC-fit

    Baptism of Chaff

    Did the Church Jump the Shark on this *One? This is a brief tale of two overseers who are originally to serve by the will of God. One, who serves the Christian within the Body of Christ (the Church) under the “bond of unity”. Secondly, one who serves both the Christian and unbeliever alike...
  6. PAC-fit

    What should our views be on LGBT

    A 1960 cultural whirlwind didn’t disappear with every subsequent decade thereafter. The descendants of the sexual-R grew to produce and permeate a portion of the population forcing both the counterpart and themselves to endure. Now, both sides wish to think on how irrelevant of a myth the other...
  7. PAC-fit

    !!DANGER!! Enemies of the Cross/Spirit!

    Sorry, but the illusion arises for me within your wording as though we are to put away responsibility, as well as all the various ways individuals are seen within the text who did not keep the actual faith. Make no mistake, they had the faith! So it is for the many who retain a fictional...
  8. PAC-fit

    !!DANGER!! Enemies of the Cross/Spirit!

    Most assuredly? I don’t follow NB, as it is not just of the talents but the seed as in, the thief himself taking the seed by whatever means, “Satan comes and takes away the word that was sown in them.” (Mk 4:15)
  9. PAC-fit

    !!DANGER!! Enemies of the Cross/Spirit!

    I believe most of your questions hinge on whether or not that seed which was sown can be stolen, or, by a malicious internal or external compromising of God’s will. All newly converted are subject to being watered, washed, enriched and regenerated in the word. Now while inwardly, these carry...
  10. PAC-fit

    Eureka! I’m late!

    For all that is said, against all the heart holds, Is any removed from yesterday’s conversion? In the face of today’s harshest cold misuse, I fail, Meticulously removing the conversion of differences In the advance of tomorrow’s insurmountable challenges, Un-announced, Glory came rushing to...
  11. PAC-fit

    !!DANGER!! Enemies of the Cross/Spirit!

    “I suspect”? Really? You aren’t sure? Which is most likely to be the guiding factor here, , , a solid affirmation of being strong in the Lord, and in the power of his might.” , , or offering up the insights of “the natural man [who] receives not the things of the Spirit of God”? (Eph 6:10...
  12. PAC-fit

    !!DANGER!! Enemies of the Cross/Spirit!

    Okay, so you have run a search to find more out a title that I chose largely at risk to not re-word. Why? Because I feel it is JUST-THAT-IMPORTANT! Scan the posts here and see for yourself the many strays spent in denial to comment on that "power"!!! Just look again at the responses and the...
  13. PAC-fit

    !!DANGER!! Enemies of the Cross/Spirit!

    Alright sir, then give me one-for-one, can you do that? I'll answer yours if you answer mine (and yes, thank you for your continuing effort). Yes, American-English is my first language. There, for whatever benefit that is to serve. Now my question to you is, What denial of "power" is the...
  14. PAC-fit

    !!DANGER!! Enemies of the Cross/Spirit!

    Modern-day word bashing, a finer example of worthy opponents would be next to impossible to find, thank you for your contributions albeit, altered direction; they have given us a peek into the defensive mind of, Hard-hearted refusal Chilly desperation You are welcome; it was my pleasure to be...
  15. PAC-fit

    !!DANGER!! Enemies of the Cross/Spirit!

    More off-topic accusations of confusion over this whole thread when the passage remains clear as day, “from such turn away” (2Tim 3:5). Oh, so the word of God is cryptic? The Apostle draws here a very dark picture of the corrupt forms of Christianity, the advent of which he tremblingly...
  16. PAC-fit

    !!DANGER!! Enemies of the Cross/Spirit!

    Thank God, the remnant received and can proceed unfettered! Sleep-tight. :censored:
  17. PAC-fit

    !!DANGER!! Enemies of the Cross/Spirit!

    Thanks! A disparaging loss and clouding of power, to which I didn’t know here we would see a distancing from the very consideration of it. The Author spoke it, why aren’t we?
  18. PAC-fit

    !!DANGER!! Enemies of the Cross/Spirit!

    Goodness-gracious, common sense and a breath of fresh air! Beautiful!! The only thing I would suggest is the liberty within that power of self-control my friend, Charge them that are rich in this present age, that they be not haughty, nor trust in uncertain riches, but in the living God...
  19. PAC-fit

    !!DANGER!! Enemies of the Cross/Spirit!

    Ya-know, something I don’t get with you guys bashing my speech equipped with perfect grammar, , if your logic is so intact, are you telling me you can’t scan something here or there that you could react to appropriately? For instance, as you can see, I use scripture. Did I use it correctly, or...
  20. PAC-fit

    !!DANGER!! Enemies of the Cross/Spirit!

    God isn’t in need of abhorring personal interpretations. If the matter is found disagreeable, say so as the Author himself pointed it out. How clumsy!