Thanks for sharing that.
I haven't heard him since he did the forensic tests.
Since I don't follow them or the latest news on the trial, I leave my mind open to other POVs.
1 Day Ago) Tyler Robinson , accused of the murder of Charlie Kirk, has second court hearing
- Thread starter Doll
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
I haven't heard him since he did the forensic tests.
Since I don't follow them or the latest news on the trial, I leave my mind open to other POVs.
It is so funny to hear them rage about "Why didn't she release the evidence earlier?" and make out her delays in releasing certain receipts for things she has claimed is for money. Lol. She does it to catch liars out in their lies (they accuse her of lying until she shows receipts a month or two later together with records of the lies they told), and they hate it.
Right..because donors who donate large sums of money do not expect anything in return.
Along with the fact he is on record talking about a meeting where he was offered even more money... have you seen that clip?
I saw a very angry exchange on video at the funeral of L. Graham.
One of those "a picture is worth a thousand words" type scenarios...amazing they know they are on camera and even yet they cannot help but let their anger shine.
Of course he took donor money, and of course donors have expectations; but that doesnt mean he ever made compromises to meet their expectations. He wasnt under any formal obligation to. Most of his discourse didnt even revolve around Israel or the middle-east... it was about liberty, free-market economics, and limited government; specifically the opposite of manufacturing consent for a dependent US.
He had influence with younger voters, that was his role and sent them in DT's direction.
Except when it does... which has already happened in the hearings that we are talking about. The judge ordered images of his alleged confession letter withheld, but the media ran them anyway.
And that was illegal.
The letter was shown in court and an illegal live streamer,illegal because the judge prohibited electronic media operation in court,broadcast the letter.
I don't know if any others saw the debate between Candace Owens and TPUSA's champion, Andrew Wilson, on this topic. For those following the matter, there wasn't really anything new, but Wilson actually did a better job of defending the Fedslop narrative than I expected (given the facts against him), although his defense was based on dishonesty and shill tactics. The main ones I recall were stalling for time by arguing over minutiae (so Candace couldn't get a word in), and posting clips of Candace's podcast edited mid-way through a sentence or thought to imply she said or meant something other than she did (after he had essentially conceded the primary focus of the debate in deed, if not in word). This said, such tactics usually repulse all those of honest or well-meaning intent, and I think it was clear by the end those pushing the Fedslop don't have a leg to stand on - Candace was left as the victor of the debate both by argument and by her honourable conduct, in sharp contrast to his.
The cherry on the cake was at the end when Candace asked him which of the charges he believed Tyler Robinson was most guilty of, and he couldn't cite any. (And then when he pushed Candace and she recited all 7, he accused her of being messaged it and reading it from her phone, and she provided her phone to the moderator to confirm that she hadn't. LOL.)
My view is that "the Doge is coming with a ledger and a light" to audit these scoundrels, and they're panicking even more. Are they going to Lee Harvey Oswald the patsy now that it is obvious to all that is what he is?
The cherry on the cake was at the end when Candace asked him which of the charges he believed Tyler Robinson was most guilty of, and he couldn't cite any. (And then when he pushed Candace and she recited all 7, he accused her of being messaged it and reading it from her phone, and she provided her phone to the moderator to confirm that she hadn't. LOL.)
My view is that "the Doge is coming with a ledger and a light" to audit these scoundrels, and they're panicking even more. Are they going to Lee Harvey Oswald the patsy now that it is obvious to all that is what he is?
I watched the highlights.. he really bit off far more than he could chew.
Not sure if you know but he admitted to being a Master Mason.
He is so very obnoxious and arrogant. He was put in his place, that is for sure.
Just reminds me of people with "cliche" responses and talking points, which we see so often and no real knowledge just a narrative they are repeating.
Yes. Parts were embarrassing to watch, and no, I didn't realise he was a master mason. But it doesn't surprise me - there's something really not right there. From him calling Erika "retarded" to then suddenly coming to her defense. There's a weird relationship with his wife where he verbally abuses her but she interferes in his debates as if she's his handler. He gives me Nick Fuentes vibes (but with less charisma). My guess is that he was somehow given an offer he couldn't refuse to take part in the debate.
That is an interesting view that his wife is his handler..yes I can see that.
It just amazes me how these people go from obscurity to high profile over night. Hmm?
I don't want to uhh... be slanderous, but the more I see of NF, Tucker's comment from last year or before that he was "gay" seems more insightful. The same sort of thing with this guy - he tries to come across as some traditional family values guy, but his wife has kids to several men... There's a kind of mismatch - the words don't match the lifestyle. Even if he was a traditional guy with a wife with a past like that, his choice of words would be different to accommodate his own family, if he wasn't acting/pretending. In my view.
I had some hope there for a bit because he could be insightful, but there is something off for sure.
We cannot help but wonder which are controlled opposition, perhaps all of them, so hard to know, which brings me to what you said to me a long while ago to always proceed with caution.
However, they do give valuable information and if they can back up what they say and if they are asking reasonable questions which Owens does, I pay attention.
True, not sure who is controlled opposition.
But we know who is openly against God.
The latest in his case.
His defense team two days ago filed a motion to take the Death Penalty off the table.
Video Producers Description:
Tyler Robinson’s defense filed a new preliminary-hearing brief on August 11, 2026—and it is trying to substantially narrow the case before trial.
The defense asks the Utah court to remove the current death-penalty pathway, strike the witness-tampering and child-related counts, remove sentencing enhancements, and question whether the State has enough reliable evidence to send the case forward to trial.
In this video, I break down:
Why the “great risk of death” allegation matters for the death penalty
The defense argument that one alleged targeted shot does not automatically establish a known high risk to someone else
Why “ask for a lawyer and stay silent” is central to the witness-tampering allegation
The arguments over alleged knowledge of children at the event
The challenge to the political-targeting enhancement
The broader hearsay and reliability fight at the preliminary-hearing stage
This is not a determination of guilt or innocence. It is an analysis of what Robinson’s defense is asking the court to do, what the State will likely argue in response, and why the court’s ruling could materially reshape the case before trial.
The brief seeks to strike the sole alleged capital aggravator, Counts Six and Seven, and two sentencing enhancements while challenging the evidence supporting the case’s advancement toward trial.(End)
*Note: Id earlier said TR's dad was a veteran police officer. This is incorrect. Early reporting thought an officer carrying his dad's name was his dad. Given his father did turn him in to police.
His defense team two days ago filed a motion to take the Death Penalty off the table.
Video Producers Description:
Tyler Robinson’s defense filed a new preliminary-hearing brief on August 11, 2026—and it is trying to substantially narrow the case before trial.
The defense asks the Utah court to remove the current death-penalty pathway, strike the witness-tampering and child-related counts, remove sentencing enhancements, and question whether the State has enough reliable evidence to send the case forward to trial.
In this video, I break down:
Why the “great risk of death” allegation matters for the death penalty
The defense argument that one alleged targeted shot does not automatically establish a known high risk to someone else
Why “ask for a lawyer and stay silent” is central to the witness-tampering allegation
The arguments over alleged knowledge of children at the event
The challenge to the political-targeting enhancement
The broader hearsay and reliability fight at the preliminary-hearing stage
This is not a determination of guilt or innocence. It is an analysis of what Robinson’s defense is asking the court to do, what the State will likely argue in response, and why the court’s ruling could materially reshape the case before trial.
The brief seeks to strike the sole alleged capital aggravator, Counts Six and Seven, and two sentencing enhancements while challenging the evidence supporting the case’s advancement toward trial.(End)
*Note: Id earlier said TR's dad was a veteran police officer. This is incorrect. Early reporting thought an officer carrying his dad's name was his dad. Given his father did turn him in to police.
This thread definitely should been started in the Conspiracy channel.
No.
It's real news.
There's a difference.
If it was moved to Conspiracy Board,those who are glad Charlie was assassinated will win. Thinking his killing and his assassin are now not main stream news . And justice is not worthy of our time.
Its news. Go to Youtube and watch the great debate held on Friday. Just because some folk insist on living under a rock doesn't a conspiracy theory make.