1 Day Ago) Tyler Robinson , accused of the murder of Charlie Kirk, has second court hearing

[Bible_Locket]

It is quite interesting that Bible_Locket is intent on derailing this thread with irrelevant posts designed to confuse the issue and change the subject.

Bible Locket is bringing evidence to refute you,and those like you,who are intent on promoting the lies of Candace Owens on this thread.

You are very upset because you have been proven a purveyor of falsehoods. And a defender of a pathological liar,Candace Owens.

Who has not ever produced one shred of evidence to support her blatant lies regarding the Assassination of Charlie Kirk.

You're upset because the lies that derailed this thread thanks to you and those like you are now refuted by the evidence.

That's too bad.

You're free to post a thread that slanders and defames Charlies murder,his widow,his children,the FBI, the courts, as you saw fit earlier in this thread.
Put your name to it.

But you won't continue here.

The truth about Charlies murder cannot be allowed to be overshadowed by purveyors of lies.

It's a sin. A wilfull sin,that was ongoing due to you and others like you.
Till now.

The truth stops you. And others like you.

That's not a derail. That's a God Blessed reality.

 

[ZNP]

Bible Locket is bringing evidence to refute you,and those like you,who are intent on promoting the lies of Candace Owens on this thread.

You are very upset because you have been proven a purveyor of falsehoods. And a defender of a pathological liar,Candace Owens.

Who has not ever produced one shred of evidence to support her blatant lies regarding the Assassination of Charlie Kirk.

You're upset because the lies that derailed this thread thanks to you and those like you are now refuted by the evidence.

That's too bad.

You're free to post a thread that slanders and defames Charlies murder,his widow,his children,the FBI, the courts, as you saw fit earlier in this thread.
Put your name to it.

But you won't continue here.

The truth about Charlies murder cannot be allowed to be overshadowed by purveyors of lies.

It's a sin. A wilfull sin,that was ongoing due to you and others like you.
Till now.

The truth stops you. And others like you.

That's not a derail. That's a God Blessed reality.

Candace Owens has absolutely nothing to do with the thread. She showed video evidence that someone with TPUSA took a SD Card from the camera behind Charlie Kirk 4 minutes after he was assassinated, put it in his pocket and texted someone. She showed a clip from an interview where a TPUSA spokesman confirmed this saying that this person did it because "they knew people were evil" and that the SD Card is now with the FBI. That wasn't Candace saying that, it was the TPUSA rep on the interview. So no, just because Candace, or Joe Rogan, or any of a hundred other youtube channels is sharing information,

the issue is the SD Card.
What is on it?
Why does the FBI have it?
Why doesn't the prosecutor in this case and the defense attorney have this evidence?
Who did this person text?
What did the text say?

All of the underlying facts have been confirmed by TPUSA, so there is no reason we are relying on Candace testimony for any of this.

 

[Bible_Locket]

Candace Owens has absolutely nothing to do with the thread. She showed video evidence that someone with TPUSA took a SD Card from the camera behind Charlie Kirk 4 minutes after he was assassinated, put it in his pocket and texted someone. She showed a clip from an interview where a TPUSA spokesman confirmed this saying that this person did it because "they knew people were evil" and that the SD Card is now with the FBI. That wasn't Candace saying that, it was the TPUSA rep on the interview. So no, just because Candace, or Joe Rogan, or any of a hundred other youtube channels is sharing information,

the issue is the SD Card.
What is on it?
Why does the FBI have it?
Why doesn't the prosecutor in this case and the defense attorney have this evidence?
Who did this person text?
What did the text say?

All of the underlying facts have been confirmed by TPUSA, so there is no reason we are relying on Candace testimony for any of this.

You appear deeply confused. Because you participated in the posts that derailed this thread to Owens lies.

If you are unaware of this evidence found on page upon page here, perhaps you should reread the thread.

It's strange you are so upset yet are so unaware of your behaviors in this thread.

I'm no longer going to read your posts. Imo,you are not well.

 

[Bible_Locket]

In order to bring this thread back into focus.

Its title is,

1 Day Ago) Tyler Robinson , accused of the murder of Charlie Kirk, has second court hearing​

Everything said by Candace Owens that has been posted so to derail focus upon defendant Tyler Robinson was an attempt first by Owens, and then her followers, to overshadow facts in evidence against Robinson.

Her conjuring lies so to derail focus upon the actual confessed Assassin is immoral.

Which is why in a thread discussing Tyler's arrest and trial deserves focus on truth. Not Owens lies that have never been substantiated.

When her lies are injected into this thread it is incumbent upon the truth to speak against it.

Which is why my contribution to that end entered in.


Owens lies are intent on making her followers believe confessed Assassin Tyler Robinson lied when he admitted to premeditating the murder of Charlie Kirk in cold blood.

That's evil.

Lying lips are an abomination to the Lord.

 

[ZNP]

You appear deeply confused. Because you participated in the posts that derailed this thread to Owens lies.

If you are unaware of this evidence found on page upon page here, perhaps you should reread the thread.

It's strange you are so upset yet are so unaware of your behaviors in this thread.

I'm no longer going to read your posts. Imo,you are not well.

I posted a link to evidence, two videos, and a ciip from an interview that confirmed there was evidence directly relevant to the trial being held by the FBI and not in the hands of the prosecutor or defense attorney. That is not derailing the thread. Candace Owens did not take either video and the interview wasn't from her show. So she is peripheral to this evidence which TPUSA has confirmed all the relevant facts and as you have so conveniently proven they have not sued her for running this show with this evidence and we now know they most certainly would have sued if the claims were false.

I have no idea what is on that video, for all I know it supports the theory that Tyler Robinson is the lone assassin. But what I do know is that it is relevant to the trial and the prosecutor and the defense attorney need to have access to the full 26 minutes on that video, unaltered.

I don't know why anyone who wants the truth to be fully revealed and every question answered would have a problem with that.

 

[ZNP]

In order to bring this thread back into focus.

Its title is,

1 Day Ago) Tyler Robinson , accused of the murder of Charlie Kirk, has second court hearing​

Everything said by Candace Owens that has been posted so to derail focus upon defendant Tyler Robinson was an attempt first by Owens, and then her followers, to overshadow facts in evidence against Robinson.

Her conjuring lies so to derail focus upon the actual confessed Assassin is immoral.

Which is why in a thread discussing Tyler's arrest and trial deserves focus on truth. Not Owens lies that have never been substantiated.

When her lies are injected into this thread it is incumbent upon the truth to speak against it.

Which is why my contribution to that end entered in.


Owens lies are intent on making her followers believe confessed Assassin Tyler Robinson lied when he admitted to premeditating the murder of Charlie Kirk in cold blood.

That's evil.

Lying lips are an abomination to the Lord.

The focus should be on the evidence in the assassination, not on some youtuber who is not a witness or in any way part of the trial. Turning the focus on her is a distraction. I have highlighted how obsessed you are with Owens, and how your post trying to "bring this thread back into focus" is so horribly obsessed with someone who has nothing to do with the trial.

the issue is the SD Card.
What is on it?
Why does the FBI have it?
Why doesn't the prosecutor in this case and the defense attorney have this evidence?
Who did this person text?
What did the text say?

All of the underlying facts have been confirmed by TPUSA

 

[Charlesiii]

What did owen say that is anti jew?

Can someone give an example? Not video, too long. Just in text.

Would you say Jesus is anti jew? Or Jesus is for jew?

She's not. She's said some harsh things against the state of Israel for the genocide committed in Gaza, but she's got Jewish friends. And she's not afraid to accuse criminals of being what they are, even if they try to hide behind their (supposed) religion of Judaism (or was it a race?) A Jewish supremicist terrorist plotting to kill her was gaolled by the FBI, and she gets accused of antisemitism for that, too. Those using the antisemitism epithet for the sake of it are just racists (or possibly supremacists themselves).

 

[ZNP]

Terrel Farnsworth is the guy who took the SD Card, then texted someone on his phone all within 4 minutes of Charlie Kirk being shot. About ten minutes after the shooting there is video of him on a laptop and it seems he has put the SD Card into the laptop and is viewing the footage. He gets up, shows this to Philip Goldsbury, the guy who mic'ed Charlie Kirk up.

This video could be proof that this guy tampered with evidence in this assassination, a felony.

To tamper with evidence is to alter, conceal, tamper or remove evidence imparing the veracity or availability of evidence in a criminal investigation.

We are simply inferring from a video what he is doing. However, what is not in dispute is that he did take the SD Card, removing it from the camera and put it in his pocket. Does that qualify as "concealing"?

He claims his intent was to protect this valuable piece of evidence from any who would steal it. That is important because that would be a valid reason to take it from the camera. But then that would not explain putting it in his computer minutes later. Again, this is an inference and to confirm this we would need access to his computer. My understanding is that if you had the computer you could determine what it was he had inserted into it and what he had then done with the SD Card.

Clearly by Terrel Farnsworth's own admission as well as TPUSA's this is a critical piece of evidence that needed to be preserved, and therefore the chain of custody is essential in knowing whether or not this evidence was tampered with. Again, the SD Card and Terrel Farnsworth's computer need to be in evidence, given to both the prosecutor and the defense attorney in this trial.

 

[Churchgoer]

She's not. She's said some harsh things against the state of Israel for the genocide committed in Gaza, but she's got Jewish friends. And she's not afraid to accuse criminals of being what they are, even if they try to hide behind their (supposed) religion of Judaism (or was it a race?) A Jewish supremicist terrorist plotting to kill her was gaolled by the FBI, and she gets accused of antisemitism for that, too. Those using the antisemitism epithet for the sake of it are just racists (or possibly supremacists themselves).

People love to throw ....ism all over. They are entitled to their opinions, but who doesn't have opinions?

Saying one ethnic is better than others, pure discrimination based on ethnic, not on Jesus blood. Jesus only see one thing, we are either in the blood covenant with Him, or not. That's it.

I can repeat this again, there is no other way to heaven, no other way to supremacy.

 

[ZNP]

What we also know about Terrel Farnsworth from David Hall is that he did not hand over the SD Card to lead investigators when they arrived on the scene. This seriously damages any attempt of his to say he was trying to protect evidence for the investigators and instead tilts the scales in favor of this being a felony in concealing evidence.

He did not hand over the SD Card, he gave them a flash drive. Once again raising the possibility that the evidence was tampered with, a felony.

This is all part of the court record.

 

[Charlesiii]

What we also know about Terrel Farnsworth from David Hall is that he did not hand over the SD Card to lead investigators when they arrived on the scene. This seriously damages any attempt of his to say he was trying to protect evidence for the investigators and instead tilts the scales in favor of this being a felony in concealing evidence.

One question I have is whether Terrel Farnsworth is still a free man, and if he is, why then isn't the SD card in the hands of the authorities? But I suppose similar questions apply to all of the evidence that the law enforcement apparently released without examination - the car, the microphone, the necklace, the phone, the suspicious backpack belonging to TPUSA... Not to mention the crime scene being concreted over by an "emergency paving" contractor.

 

[ZNP]

Chain of Custody

I include this because there is no way anyone in law enforcement advised Terrel Farnsworth to do this, doing it is a criminal offense that would get any policeman fired and prosecuted.

The chain of custody should be maintained at all times by all laboratories with access to the evidence.

The chain of custody is a recorded means of verifying where the evidence has travelled and who handled it before the trial. The reason for establishing a chain of custody is to prevent substitution of, tampering with, mistaking the identity of, damaging, altering, contaminating, misplacing or falsifying the evidence.

This principle and procedure creates legal integrity of the evidence. The chain of custody verifies both the legal integrity and the authenticity of all evidence. Without proof of an intact chain of custody, the evidence may be excluded from trial or afforded less weight by the trier of fact.

All laboratories that have access to the evidence must maintain accurate accountability of the chain of custody. It is best for the laboratory to keep the evidence in safe, properly controlled storage facilities and to limit the number of people who come in contact with the evidence.

Throughout the collection, handling, testing and storage procedures, strict protocols must be followed to ensure that the evidence remains verifiable in terms of authenticity and integrity. Each person that handles the evidence must be identified, and all periods of custody must be properly accounted for and recorded.

Failure to establish identity, authenticity, legal integrity, and a complete chain of custody for any item of evidence that passes through the laboratory may result in exclusion of the evidence or a limiting instruction to the jury regarding how to weigh the testimony.

The first cops on the scene understand their job is to secure the crime scene until investigators show up. The allegation made by TPUSA spokesman is that the police advised Terrel to do this (Terrel has never said that) is ridiculous. If in fact it is true, then let's have a cop come forward and testify that he gave this advice.
Here is what cops are trained to do when they arrive at a crime scene to secure it:
When police arrive to secure a crime scene, they will instruct bystanders, victims, and witnesses not to touch, move, or alter anything, and to immediately step outside the taped perimeter to prevent evidence destruction or contamination. [1, 2, 3]

Key Instructions Given by Officers

• • Do not touch anything: Officers tell people to leave objects, weapons, furniture, and surfaces exactly as they are. [1]
  • Do not clean or tidy up: People are warned not to clean up blood, throw away trash, wash items, or straighten the room.
  • Leave the area immediately: Occupants and witnesses are ordered to step back, exit the location, and stay behind the physical boundary or crime scene tape. [1, 2]
  • Do not walk through the path: Individuals are told to avoid tracking through potential footprints, tire tracks, or fluid drops.

TPUSA claims that these allegations made by "conspiracy theorists" are damaging to them. But they are the ones alleging that cops violated the law by instructing Farnsworth to take key evidence from the crime scene. That allegation could get someone fired, it is slanderous.

 

[Churchgoer]

Chain of Custody

I include this because there is no way anyone in law enforcement advised Terrel Farnsworth to do this, doing it is a criminal offense that would get any policeman fired and prosecuted.

The chain of custody should be maintained at all times by all laboratories with access to the evidence.

The chain of custody is a recorded means of verifying where the evidence has travelled and who handled it before the trial. The reason for establishing a chain of custody is to prevent substitution of, tampering with, mistaking the identity of, damaging, altering, contaminating, misplacing or falsifying the evidence.

This principle and procedure creates legal integrity of the evidence. The chain of custody verifies both the legal integrity and the authenticity of all evidence. Without proof of an intact chain of custody, the evidence may be excluded from trial or afforded less weight by the trier of fact.

All laboratories that have access to the evidence must maintain accurate accountability of the chain of custody. It is best for the laboratory to keep the evidence in safe, properly controlled storage facilities and to limit the number of people who come in contact with the evidence.

Throughout the collection, handling, testing and storage procedures, strict protocols must be followed to ensure that the evidence remains verifiable in terms of authenticity and integrity. Each person that handles the evidence must be identified, and all periods of custody must be properly accounted for and recorded.

Failure to establish identity, authenticity, legal integrity, and a complete chain of custody for any item of evidence that passes through the laboratory may result in exclusion of the evidence or a limiting instruction to the jury regarding how to weigh the testimony.

The first cops on the scene understand their job is to secure the crime scene until investigators show up. The allegation made by TPUSA spokesman is that the police advised Terrel to do this (Terrel has never said that) is ridiculous. If in fact it is true, then let's have a cop come forward and testify that he gave this advice.
Here is what cops are trained to do when they arrive at a crime scene to secure it:
When police arrive to secure a crime scene, they will instruct bystanders, victims, and witnesses not to touch, move, or alter anything, and to immediately step outside the taped perimeter to prevent evidence destruction or contamination. [1, 2, 3]

Key Instructions Given by Officers

• • Do not touch anything: Officers tell people to leave objects, weapons, furniture, and surfaces exactly as they are. [1]
  • Do not clean or tidy up: People are warned not to clean up blood, throw away trash, wash items, or straighten the room.
  • Leave the area immediately: Occupants and witnesses are ordered to step back, exit the location, and stay behind the physical boundary or crime scene tape. [1, 2]
  • Do not walk through the path: Individuals are told to avoid tracking through potential footprints, tire tracks, or fluid drops.

TPUSA claims that these allegations made by "conspiracy theorists" are damaging to them. But they are the ones alleging that cops violated the law by instructing Farnsworth to take key evidence from the crime scene. That allegation could get someone fired, it is slanderous.

Pointing fingers, yeah, the old trick again and again.
Jesus taught us from His personal stories, don't trust the authority.

 

[ZNP]

There have been three different reasons given to us for Terrel to have taken evidence from the crime scene.

1. Terrel Farnsworth -- never said that he spoke to law enforcement, he said he spoke to Erika and then took the footage to protect her from seeing Charlie killed in 4k. (For those not familiar with Erika she is the one who came out at the end of the Charlie Kirk memorial to a pyrotechnic display).

2. Tyler Boyer said he was told by the police to take it.

3. Andrew Kolvak told the public that he did this because he was fearful of "evil people" who "steal hats".

 

[Charlesiii]

There have been three different reasons given to us for Terrel to have taken evidence from the crime scene.

1. Terrel Farnsworth -- never said that he spoke to law enforcement, he said he spoke to Erika and then took the footage to protect her from seeing Charlie killed in 4k. (For those not familiar with Erika she is the one who came out at the end of the Charlie Kirk memorial to a pyrotechnic display).

2. Tyler Boyer said he was told by the police to take it.

3. Andrew Kolvak told the public that he did this because he was fearful of "evil people" who "steal hats".

If Terrel Farnsworth is not taken in for questioning now, the officer in charge of the investigation should be himself investigated, by an authority not in any ways tied up with this comedy of Keystone cops that appears to be operating out of Utah.

 

[ZNP]

So here is what we know,

1. critical piece of evidence was taken from the crime scene by Terrel Farnsworth. That is not in dispute.

2. The evidence was altered and concealed. Investigators were given a 3 minute video on a flash drive rather than the full 26 minutes on the SD Card.

3. At least two of the three explanations for why he did this were false. They can be seen as slanderous, obfuscation, or just lies.

Therefore Terrel Farnsworth needs to be prosecuted for tampering with evidence. I am not saying "convicted" you are innocent until proven guilty, but the clear and undeniable evidence is sufficient to warrant a prosecution.

In this trial you would subpoena the phone records to know what the text message was and who he texted at that moment.

You would also want to determine if in fact there was a policeman who instructed him to do this, if not, Tyler Boyer should also be investigated for lying to the police and obstructing justice.

You would also subpoena the laptop he used and the SD Card as well as the flash drive given to the investigators. It is critical to this criminal prosecution to determine what was altered in the evidence.

Personally I don't see how we can prosecute anyone for killing Charlie Kirk until this investigation is done first. For example, suppose Terrel is convicted of tampering with evidence and the phone call and text message indicates he was told to do this by someone else. That would be a lead you would want to follow up on. Suppose the people convicted from this investigation were willing to become cooperating witnesses, that would also be crucial to a trial of whoever was responsible for this assassination.

 

[ZNP]

Pointing fingers, yeah, the old trick again and again.
Jesus taught us from His personal stories, don't trust the authority.

they sharpen their tongues like swords

 

[ZNP]

The Maroon guy --

Video shown in court that they are claiming is Tyler Robinson but appears to be significantly whiter than Tyler Robinson. BTW this video footage shown in court for Tyler Robinson was altered. The aspect ratio was decreased giving the video a "squished" appearance and you can tell by looking at the cars. This is the critical video that they claim shows Tyler Robinson. A government source has confirmed that the video shown in court used to prove that Tyler Robinson was at a certain place at a certain time was modified by decreasing the aspect ratio.

 

[Churchgoer]

The Maroon guy --

Video shown in court that they are claiming is Tyler Robinson but appears to be significantly whiter than Tyler Robinson. BTW this video footage shown in court for Tyler Robinson was altered. The aspect ratio was decreased giving the video a "squished" appearance and you can tell by looking at the cars. This is the critical video that they claim shows Tyler Robinson. A government source has confirmed that the video shown in court used to prove that Tyler Robinson was at a certain place at a certain time was modified by decreasing the aspect ratio.

Check the face feature. One is better looking, sharper facial features.

All white people look the same? They can't tell the difference?

 

[ZNP]

Check the face feature. One is better looking, sharper facial features.

All white people look the same? They can't tell the difference?

Perhaps they don't want to tell the difference