Precisely. And as you note, the treatment of Mark16:16 is a great example of this.In other words,
You take all of His word, then filter it through faith alone regeneration theology before reaching your conclusion on doctrine.
Precisely. And as you note, the treatment of Mark16:16 is a great example of this.In other words,
You take all of His word, then filter it through faith alone regeneration theology before reaching your conclusion on doctrine.
You don't get out much, obviously. Either that, or you deny the testimony of believers who experience speaking in tongues. In other words, you call them liars. For example, I watched an interview with a missionary who went to Haiti to start at work. She testified that the locals could understand her even though she could not naturally speak the language. She was speaking the language and did not realise it.What makes you so sure that tongues have not ceased?
Consider that the Bible states that at some point in time that tongues will cease, 1st Cor. 13:8.
Consider that no one today speaks in this supernatural manner.
It is fair to say that tongues ended at some unknown moment in the past.
Just like manna simply ceased to fall, so too has tongues.
This lines up with scripture much more then believing that tongues is somehow still going on today.
Pretty sure doesn't cut it.I’m pretty sure I’ve got it! Lol
Like I said, you only take part of the Scripture….
Then those who gladly received his word (through repentance/faith) were afterwards baptized. Just as we see in Acts 10:43-47.-"Then those who gladly received his word were baptized; and that day about 3000 souls were added to them. And they continued steadfastly in the apostles’ doctrine and fellowship, in the breaking of bread, and in prayers."
Acts 2:41-42 NKJV
There is only one baptism that saves and places us into the body of Christ and that is Spirit baptism, not water baptism.O-"There is one body and one Spirit, just as you were called in one hope of your calling; one Lord, one faith, one baptism; one God and Father of all, who is above all, and through all, and in you all."
Ephesians 4:4-6 NKJV
Circumcision made without hands. See Romans 2:29. Paul clearly teaches that what is signified in baptism (buried and raised with Christ) actually occurs "through faith." Christians are "buried with Him in baptism, in which you also were raised with Him through faith in the working of God, who raised Him from the dead" (Colossians 2:12). Justification on account of union in Christ's death, burial and resurrection is brought about "through faith" - and is properly symbolized by dipping the new believer in and out of the water.-"In Him you were also circumcised with the circumcision made without hands, by putting off the body of the sins of the flesh, by the circumcision of Christ, buried with Him in baptism, in which you also were raised with Him through faith in the working of God, who raised Him from the dead."
Colossians 2:11-12 NKJV
In 1 Peter 3:21, Peter tells us that baptism now saves you, yet when Peter uses this phrase, he continues in the same sentence to explain exactly what he means by it. He said that baptism now saves you-not the removal of dirt from the flesh (that is, not as an outward, physical act which washes dirt from the body--that is not what saves you), "but an appeal to God for a good conscience, through the resurrection of Jesus Christ" (that is, as an inward, spiritual transaction between God and the individual, a transaction that is symbolized by the outward ceremony of water baptism).-"There is also an antitype which now saves us—baptism (not the removal of the filth of the flesh, but the answer of a good conscience toward God), through the resurrection of Jesus Christ, who has gone into heaven and is at the right hand of God, angels and authorities and powers having been made subject to Him."
I Peter 3:21-22 NKJV
I did not twist Mark 16:16. I considered the whole verse (and not merely the first half) then I properly harmonized it with what Jesus said in (John 3:15,16,18; 5:24; 6:29,40,47; 11:25,26).In other words,
You take all of His word, then filter it through faith alone regeneration theology before reaching your conclusion on doctrine.
Your twisting of such a simple verse as Mark 16:16 is damning evidence of your filter.
Your inability to not see the lack of any definitive in the verses you site in post #2491 exposes your weak theology.
Your willingness to disregard basic logic is shameful.
You are much like Naaman, prideful and stubborn.
Water baptism is a work of righteousness (Matthew 3:13-15) and we are not saved by works of righteousness which we have done. (Titus 3:5) If water baptism stands between us and heaven, then baptism is a work of merit. Did God water baptize you or did man? You can't have it both ways. You seem to have your own personal definition of non-meritorious works. So, I may find myself without a wedding garment? More judging. Be sure to examine yourself.Your insistence on labeling water baptism as a work of human merit and not as a work of God is appalling. Romans 6:4 & Col. 2:12
I suggest you rethink this notion.
You may find yourself without a wedding garment.
Did God water baptize Jesus or did a man?Did God water baptize you or did man? You can't have it both ways.
So, it looks like you're saying baptism is required, but which baptism? I guess we have 3 options:What if the spirit of the 'baptized' in Mark 16:16's is a Spirit Ziploc sandwich bag baptism that stands as a Holy Spirit certification (I'm not to evidence in tongues) which works as a better sort of preservation than reading it as a fold top sandwich bag water baptism. Then it would go without saying, as is the pattern of the verse, that those who do not believe are then not (authentically) baptized.
John the Baptist water baptized Jesus.Did God water baptize Jesus or did a man?
This phrase indicates Jesus was fulfilling every requirement or duty that God demanded, marking the official inauguration of his ministry.Without John (the man) physically water baptizing Jesus, this necessary act of righteousness would not have happened.
For us to fulfill all righteousness which only Jesus could do?This is why Jesus commanded water baptism in Mark 16:16.
You can't have it both ways. (Titus 3:5)You can't have it both ways.
Your baptismal regeneration theology is on full display. My faith remains in the Savior GodYour faith alone regeneration theology is on full display.
Since when is it prideful to listen to what God said?? You’re wresting Scripture, twisting it to fit into a man-made gospel.I did not twist Mark 16:16. I considered the whole verse (and not merely the first half) then I properly harmonized it with what Jesus said in (John 3:15,16,18; 5:24; 6:29,40,47; 11:25,26).
John 3:18 - He who believes in Him is not condemned; but he who (is not water baptized? - NO) does not believe is condemned already, because he has not (been water baptized? - NO) because he has not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God.
So, I am like Naaman, prideful and stubborn? You sound very judgmental, which stems from pride.
Myles Coverdale, theologian & translator of the Coverdale Bible, taught that Scripture must never be judged by what is spoken or written only, but by asking: of whom, to whom, with what words, at what time, where, for what intent, under what circumstances, and in light of what comes before and after.So, it looks like you're saying baptism is required, but which baptism? I guess we have 3 options:
- water
- Spirit
- water and Spirit
I think both are attested to in Mark.
Closest context seems to tie Mark to Matthew - the Great Commission - where His men are commanded to baptize & He assures them He - the one who will baptize in Spirit - is right there with them.
NKJ Mark16:15-16 And He said to them, "Go into all the world and preach the gospel to every creature. 16 "He who believes and is baptized will be saved; but he who does not believe will be condemned.
NKJ Matt28:18-20 And Jesus came and spoke to them, saying, "All authority has been given to Me in heaven and on earth. 19 "Go therefore and make disciples of all the nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, 20 "teaching them to observe all things that I have commanded you; and lo, I am with you always, even to the end of the age." Amen.
Maybe He's given them the Ziploc and is the one who seals it shut when they use it as commanded.
Oh, the irony.Since when is it prideful to listen to what God said?? You’re wresting Scripture, twisting it to fit into a man-made gospel.
1 John 5:9 comes to mind.So, it looks like you're saying baptism is required, but which baptism? I guess we have 3 options:
- water
- Spirit
- water and Spirit
I think both are attested to in Mark.
Closest context seems to tie Mark to Matthew - the Great Commission - where His men are commanded to baptize & He assures them He - the one who will baptize in Spirit - is right there with them.
NKJ Mark16:15-16 And He said to them, "Go into all the world and preach the gospel to every creature. 16 "He who believes and is baptized will be saved; but he who does not believe will be condemned.
NKJ Matt28:18-20 And Jesus came and spoke to them, saying, "All authority has been given to Me in heaven and on earth. 19 "Go therefore and make disciples of all the nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, 20 "teaching them to observe all things that I have commanded you; and lo, I am with you always, even to the end of the age." Amen.
Maybe He's given them the Ziploc and is the one who seals it shut when they use it as commanded.
If you were open minded, you would see that tongues have ceased.You don't get out much, obviously. Either that, or you deny the testimony of believers who experience speaking in tongues. In other words, you call them liars. For example, I watched an interview with a missionary who went to Haiti to start at work. She testified that the locals could understand her even though she could not naturally speak the language. She was speaking the language and did not realise it.
Yes, tongues will cease. It is the least of the gifts. But that does not mean it no longer happens. I do not speak in tongues any more. My does often. In case you had not noticed, the perfect has not come as yet. It is presumption to say that the "perfect" refers to the canon of scripture. Scripture says that only a tiny portion of what Jesus did has been recorded. One day, that will all be made clear. Until then, the perfect has not come.
Good point, thanks.A better way of saying it is:
***NOWHERE does the Bible say, "faith alone or condemned."***
Which is the moment of the remission of sins, just as Peter commanded in Acts 2:38.afterwards baptized
Acts 10:43 - Of Him all the prophets bear witness that through His name everyone who believes in Him receives forgiveness of sins.Which is the moment of the remission of sins, just as Peter commanded in Acts 2:38.
There is no mention of the remission of sins before water baptism in Acts 10:44-48 that you are citing.
Just try seeing the scriptures without the faith alone regeneration theology filter.
Agreed, Mark16:15-16 seem quite clear. The tie to the Commission re: water baptism also seems clear.1 John 5:9 comes to mind.
Even if we accept human testimony, the testimony of God is greater. For this is the testimony that God has given about His Son.
Putting that verse back into its context, he verses following it are fairly self-explanatory but look at 1 John 5:8 which speaks of God's testimony about His Son, mentioning that the Spirit, the water, and the blood as being in agreement. Now, we don't have to assume that the Spirit is of God, and the blood is that of Jesus,' so why do we default that the water is specifically speaking of baptism in dihydrogen monoxide?