After Trump, who’s the next guy or gal?
- Thread starter Socreta93
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
S
seantspence
Guest
I think it was Biden. I don’t really pay attention to politics anymore…no one really knows who will win. Ultimately Jesus is king. So if you are following a human, you’re most likely idolizing them.
While there are people on both sides that tend to idolize their chosen "leader", simply following along with the political process, and being vested in a particular outcome, is not "idolizing"
But your point has validity.
And if the Marxists become king, we may wish to join Jesus in his heavenly kingdom ASAP.
Politics involves compromise. For example, our current economic policies are a compromise between capitalism and socialism. However, it is getting more and more difficult for most of us to find common ground with those who want open borders, transgendering, high inflation and otherwise the ruination of this nation.
Tim Scott for the good boy type Republican, Byron Donalds for the grittier more new Republican like Trump. If Trump wins he ought to elevate them both, I wanna see them get tested further, there is a good case for either one of them to become the first real black American President that is actually an ADOS. I like Tim better cause I think he's more Christian and he's more stable and has like long and big experience being a Senator, but Byron be cold man, he's a fighter and more of a better more like Trump is in terms of speaking and energy personality. Don't be like the democrats and go for DEI crap, like these two deserve a bigger shot on their own merits, they are presidential tier candidates to keep an eye on regardless of race.
Tim Scott was my first choice for Trump to pick as his running mate.
Sound choice for sure. Win or lose JD Vance benefits from the media exposure.
I guess that he could buy America and change the rules. I like the guy too. Very smart. Amusing too.
Likewise, he was my guess I think in the other topic about Trump. Vance was a big surprise, but I'd say he's proven to be a good pick with the VP debate and the campaign, he definitely shouldn't be ruled out just because he's white, he's proven to be a very sort of high energy rising star in his own right. 2028 primaries will be interesting granting that we can save democracy and get Trump and actually have real elections agains.
i wouldn't mind being president. for starters: everyone who can see, hear, smell, taste, touch, reason, solve, think, & understand will have to work. ONLY PEOPLE WITH HANDICAPS & DISABILITIES GET GOVERNMENT HELP. (2nd Thessolonians 3:10). if a politician lies, he or she is barred for life from serving in government. no perks or extras of any kind for politicians. no foreign dependency: our own oil, manufacturing, clothing, our own everything & no military assistance for anyone that has broken a previous contract, who has started a war with us at anytime & no warnings on where we are going to bomb or strike. the last is like a boxer saying, "i'm going to jab your right jaw", then he throws a punch!
Well, if something happens to Trump, it'll be Vance. If something happens to Vance, it'll be the Speaker of the House, Mike Johnson. If you're talking about who will be the next Republican presidential candidate in 2028, who knows.
If it's a matter of who would I like to see and who would I vote for, I don't really care; as long as they have maturity, intelligence, and a proven record of working well with others. That's asking a lot these days.
Yeah, no, we can't get that. That's like asking for a pair of pants that won't wear out in a month and a half.
The official United States policy regarding the use of nuclear weapons is to 'fire without warning'. Another facet of that policy is MAD, otherwise known as Mutual Assured Destruction. It has been MAD which has deterred the nuclear powers on the use of their weapons.
we should bomb long distance more. so when these skirmishes pop up here & there, we move our troops to said area, enemy knows it, time passes by & the enemy is waiting, there's no surprise.