Here is an issue related to church/denominational politics more than to the moral arena.
Those who view the biblical canon as inspired by God disagree about what this means. Some people speak as though God dictated every word of the Bible to the human writers, which causes many atheists to be confused, because they do not realize that the dictation theory has several caveats, such as that it refers to the original manuscripts (which we do not have), which must be correctly interpreted. And the key to correct interpretation is NOT viewing the Bible as a modern science or history textbook, but rather as concerned with communicating God’s will to humanity regarding His requirement for salvation: THAT is what is inerrant!
The salvationist view of inspiration seems more logical than the dictationist view according to the following logic: Suppose God Himself wrote the inerrant message to humanity: “Thou shalt not lie, steal, murder or fornicate.” Suppose the first manuscript copier accidentally left out the comma between lie and steal. Would that invalidate God’s commandment? No, but it is still a mistake and no longer perfectly inerrant.
Now suppose an evil copier intentionally changed the word fornicate to fumigate. Would that invalidate God’s commandment? Not all of it; only the changed word. How could we know which word or words were correct and not changed? We would need to compare the commandment with other statements purported to be inspired by God in order to see what is the overall or consistent message, so that we can acquire sufficient evidence to have reasonable belief that the word fumigate should be discounted.
Finally, suppose that no one changed God’s original commandment. How could we know absolutely or infallibly that it was inerrant? We could not; we walk by faith. We would still need to compare it with the totality of truth in order to discover whether there were any inconsistencies. Thus, a completely inerrant Bible is not needed, as long as there is sufficient consistency in God’s messages to humanity via the creation (TOJ #4), the scriptures (TOJ #3), the incarnate word (TOJ #186) and logic (TOJ #182) for souls to discern God’s requirement for salvation.
Now that the 2024 election has concluded except where a couple of states have problematic policies, I suggest that one of the themes of this thread be discerning whether actions of the new government jibe with our biblical moral values.
For example, the new Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) led by Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswami will try to eliminate wasteful spending and bring the budget into balance, which will save our nation from bankruptcy and citizens from inflation that will help the poor.
Also, the new border czar will curtail the cartels that engage in trafficking people and smuggling drugs, which will save children from being abused, women from being sex slaves and people dying from fentanyl poisoning.
I know that on this point you confuse a bit the Kingdom of God with another day on planet Earth but i find your ideas and understanding very refreshing and informative so i look forward to your thoughts.
Well, I follow the lead of Jesus in praying for God's kingdom to come on earth as it is in heaven (MT 6:10), but I was hoping to learn YOUR thoughts about this.
My thoughts on this subject which i mentioned to you earlier is that when we make that prayer, we are praying for God and HIS will to be done HERE just like it is in Heaven.
We are not praying for some random soul to BRING the Kingdom of Heaven here. We are praying for God Himself.
We cannot legislate Faith because it will turn into a dictatorship like communism and we would be violating the most important attribute that God has given us: Free Will.
So only God can sort out this fallen world, not us.
When we do our daily affairs here including politics we are doing them using our best judgment here and now, but not because they have anything to do with how God would run a society who HE will run perfectly in the New Jerusalem.
Eli,
God has used random souls throughout history to do His will on earth, so let us not reject the way God might want to answer our prayers.
While neither God will--nor governments can--force Faith, we can exercise faith to resist devils/dictators as much as divinely permissible, believing that God is sorting out this fallen world with our cooperation.
It is possible that an imperfect earthly society can reflect the heavenly Jerusalem to some better extent, although we should not expect to create a utopia.
Over...
Yes i do not reject prophets, miracles and Jesus Christ Himeself throughout history.
But i don't confuse that with them preaching the Kingdom of God compared to a random year, at a random part of the world with a random politician. Hopefully you don't get so attached to this idea because not only it won't work but it will turn in the same thing as those people we condemn such as muslims.
So i see this activity here and now as team sports and i am not emotionally invested in any of them.
I have given my heart to Christ not to any politician.
Actually all 3 words historically represent our government.
etymology: democracy comes from the Greek roots meaning “rule by the people,”
Republic comes from the Latin roots meaning “public good” or “public affair,” used in ancient Rome to mean simply “state” or “country” with reference to the representative democracy of the Roman Republic.
A governmental constitution is a social code, which declares the character of the government, and defines the philosophies and values to which society must conform.
A democracy is rule by the people which we are.
A Republic demands that rule to be for the public good of all people (to restrict majority rule)
A condition created by the people for the public good was created to restrict federal governments power.
The word salad doesn't explain the context of the United States. We are not Russia or China
We are the United States, meaning individual states can succeed from the others. Like TX, it is known as the Lone Star State.
Now that the 2024 election has concluded except where a couple of states have problematic policies, I suggest that one of the themes of this thread be discerning whether actions of the new government jibe with our biblical moral values.
For example, the new Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) led by Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswami will try to eliminate wasteful spending and bring the budget into balance, which will save our nation from bankruptcy and citizens from inflation that will help the poor.
Also, the new border czar will curtail the cartels that engage in trafficking people and smuggling drugs, which will save children from being abused, women from being sex slaves and people dying from fentanyl poisoning.
we are like no otherNothing I said negates the meaning of the terms which holds to the agreed method of democracy under united states that agreed to govern under a constitutional republic.