Without having a direct quote, I can only say that I think I said something like "my interpretation of the KOG is closer to correct or how God means it than yours".
I generally ignore insults such as “you sound like a child” as not worth responding to.
I say both that I am fallible and that I believe I am correct because I amend by belief as soon as I think another is better/truer.
You said "You say something completely unrelated to this train of thought. Do you have comprehension problems or something?": I have no idea what you are ranting about since you did not provide a quote.
I generally ignore insults such as “you sound like a child” as not worth responding to.
I say both that I am fallible and that I believe I am correct because I amend by belief as soon as I think another is better/truer.
You said "You say something completely unrelated to this train of thought. Do you have comprehension problems or something?": I have no idea what you are ranting about since you did not provide a quote.
You said, "The mid-level agreement is that I told you that I support RFK, Trump or MAGA, but NOT because it has anything to do with God. This is the part that gets you bent out of shape and can’t accept." I don't get bent but merely surprised that you support folks for reasons that have nothing to do with GW, because I always evaluate people in light of GW.
Also the fact that you confuse MAGA with GW is again your problem not my problem which I will continue to point out to you. Because you think there’s a connection while I’m telling you that there’s no connection because it’s not Biblically supported.
You said, "You are the one who confuses KOG with Politics. Not me." I deny doing that, but you cannot deny judging me in that regard, because you just did and do it every post. "you treat it as a crossword puzzle to fit your preconceived ideologies."
We’re good then?
You asked, "Do you even know what projection means?" Of course, especially because I have been experiencing it every time you post.
But you are saying something and I am responding to that something, which in this case is your confusion of KOG with MAGA.
You said, "It is self-evident that I will not learn the answer to a mystery with a little more Bible study." I cannot argue with that.
Yes, many topics are mysteries, but I know that I have learned a lot of answers to questions I have had by studying GW with an open mind.
Yes, many topics are mysteries, but I know that I have learned a lot of answers to questions I have had by studying GW with an open mind.
You ask, "why do you think you will find the answers in the Bible only?" Did I say "only"? Yes, we learn from scientific study of nature also.
You said, "So You think that because you said IMO this somehow makes you more humble when you say that God is going to agree with you?": I say that to indicate that even though I have searched the Scriptures diligently seeking answers to various questions, I do not claim that what I found is infallible, even though as a truthseeker, whenever I encounter someone who has a contradictory understanding, I want to learn which is the better belief, to admit when I am wrong, and to change my opinion. IOW, I always apply Scripture to myself, which is why you may have noticed that I do not judge or belittle your beliefs, but only try to defend against your attacks.
This discussion is an attack according to you? And when you are in the trenches and you have bullets flying around, what do you call those? The enemy is sending compliments?
I also told you that you’re on an international forum and I’m guessing you’ve never had a debate with a Greek, Egyptian or Israeli guy right? Well, I have because I am from the area so I don’t feel “attacked” or act like a liberal when I hear an idea for which I can choose or not to respond.
So, my response to you started when I said that I support MAGA on NON-Biblical basis and now we are here a day later.
So try to keep up, learn anything new and then respond. So far I see that you seem very confused with having a discussion or trying to keep a train of thought.
You asked, "Where do you think your “logical” train of thought has led you in your pursuit to merge your love of MAGA with KOG?" If you read my quote you should see that I said "logic will lead an unbiased truthseeker to have a propensity to believe in an all-loving God, who is not tricky and does not hide the way to heaven (HB 11:6, ACTS 13:10)."
You said, "Amen to that! ["My reason for posting on CC is simply to share my fallible faith with others, hoping they will find what I have learned helpful for understanding ultimate truth. I am grateful to all people—famous philosophers and anonymous acquaintances—who have helped shape my beliefs."] I am also grateful for many others before me who have done a lot of work in understanding our natural and spiritual state. I am most grateful for Jesus Christ Himself." Amen!
You said, "I will never support MAGA on Biblical basis because it’s not supportable. You can support it of course because you have free-will, and I will call you out for it." Okay, I will do that next time, but for now I will merely repeat that your failure to quote me causes you to lie about what I say, which is that I would like to be part of the answer to the prayer of Jesus for oneness in JN 17:20-23, so He is the one you should tell that we are all different.
“Please play back a recording of me when I said that. “
Do you know how to have a conversation and most importantly, do you remember what you say?
You said, "Well yes of course churches are not perfect but they are the closest aligned to the KOG not some political party in USA in 2024 election." Yes, IYHO, and in the same way MAGA policies are more closely aligned with the KOG morality than the current Dems IMHO.
Churches have a Bible on their table which is the word of God which is the central theme and they follow and worship God’s ways until the New Kingdom.
Governments have laws, consitutions, courts and rules on their tables and they follow special interests, egos, money and pride in their pursuit.