Really? Kay, boiled down, would full participation of Romans 13 throw the U.S. into un-containable turmoil?
No--although that may depend on how one interprets it. IMO, the good soldiers just defeated the bad ones in recent election.
Really? Kay, boiled down, would full participation of Romans 13 throw the U.S. into un-containable turmoil?
That just can't be. Sorry, I'm still new here and might be better off quietly monitoring things in prayer. But, if the interpretation is allowed to shift, so uncustomary and unlike the ability He expects us to move (1Cor 6:2) on issues with decipherin the ''evil'' of Romans 13:3. In terms of the full impact of the Romans 13 soldier, it is clear, that Soldier/Minister will understand the current evil around him while working those very duties (Philippians 2:15).No--although that may depend on how one interprets it.

That just can't be. Sorry, I'm still new here and might be better off quietly monitoring things in prayer. But, if the interpretation is allowed to shift, so uncustomary and unlike the ability He expects us to move (1Cor 6:2) on issues with decipherin the ''evil'' of Romans 13:3. In terms of the full impact of the Romans 13 soldier, it is clear, that Soldier/Minister will understand the current evil around him while working those very duties (Philippians 2:15).
Well, we should use that money to pay off our debt, just as you do instead of building up debt on a credit card.Look at this @GWH .
This is the 30% waste i was talking about. Yet, despite all this waste US has more money than the rest of the world.
View attachment 271146
Thanks, would love to be able to report responses to my 10-12 year-old enquiry of the Romans 13 ''servant'' is commonplace. But sad to say is anything but. Quite the contrary to downright misguided therories. I won't emphasize the confusion.You bring up an interesting concept: "Do you not know that the Lord's people will judge the world?" (1CR 6:2) The context seems to mean that Christians should share the mind of Christ (1CR 2:16) or be mature (EPH 4:14-15)
Kinda what I was thinking. But what a marvel to see the scholar of all competence dance their way around this as though we were the scheming discontents with what the Lord has done for us to be concerned with such trivial matters.This relates directly to RM 13:1-5, which indicates that God does not ordain evil governments that punish godly Christians, if one reads beyond verse 1.
Thanks, would love to be able to report responses to my 10-12 year-old enquiry of the Romans 13 ''servant'' is commonplace. But sad to say is anything but. Quite the contrary to downright misguided therories. I won't emphasize the confusion.
Kinda what I was thinking. But what a marvel to see the scholar of all competence dance their way around this as though we were the scheming discontents with what the Lord has done for us to be concerned with such trivial matters.
So happy to hear a confirming voice!!
Well, we should use that money to pay off our debt, just as you do instead of building up debt on a credit card.
I posted this in the Family forum, but...
I've been more convinced that those who choose not to vote renounce any right to compain, criticize, protest or lament the unrighteous decisions and rulings our government makes. For example, if you choose not to vote, you have no standing to criticize the government or society for it's decisions regarding abortion. Whatever the government and the populous majority decide is acceptable. You may spiritually intercede on the behalf of life, but you fall short in actually advocating for it.
If you're content to just pray against things, so be it. But if you want to fight in physical and practial ways, a political vote is important. Jesus did not just operate in the spiritual realms. He also operated and ministered in the physical realms.
This is theoretically correct but practically incorrect.
You now why?
Because we’re not too big to fail, that’s why!
You see, if you or I can’t pay our mortgage, nobody is going to give us a blank check to pay it and also go on vacation.
No, they’ll evict us and sell the home.
That’s why it’s not the same thing.

@GWH i told you that i like you many times, but i also like how a southern baptist arrived at many teachings of the Bible which align more with Eastern Christianity than Western Christianity. I am not sure how you arrived at this point, on your own or if someone taught you (if any) but God works in mysterious ways as you said.
This is why i agree with you on 50% of the things you say.
The other 50% is that we (on the East) say "we don't know" or "it's a mystery" on some topics as opposed to giving wrong answers.
It's that whole Faith and Belief aspect that You and I have said.
Anyway, what do you think about this:
View attachment 271167
I say Yes, do it. I don't know any arguments against it. Something to do with farming i've heard? But not sure.
What do you think?
I posted this in the Family forum, but...
I've been more convinced that those who choose not to vote renounce any right to compain, criticize, protest or lament the unrighteous decisions and rulings our government makes. For example, if you choose not to vote, you have no standing to criticize the government or society for it's decisions regarding abortion.
How you doing today army?
I got a new Political/Ethical dilemma for you. Old people!
I will start with my own father. My father is a chess player and he’s 85 years old right now.
But 10 years ago he was driving on his own, to go to chess tournaments weekly. I knew that he’s not a good driver and God has protected him, and many people on the road have tried to avoid his driving, but that day 10 years ago my mother told me to go with him because she told me he’s not the same behind the wheel.
So I did. He didn’t have to go very far, about 2-3 miles when I noticed that he almost hit the sidewalk. So I told him “stop and let me drive”. I took the wheel and I convinced him to never drive again. So I take him to chess tournaments now or call an uber when I’m busy.
So the question is: How old should we let old people drive? Or maybe not just the age, but a thorough examination of their skills? Because obviously the registry of motor vehicles in Massachusetts didn’t see a problem with my father’s driving when they renewed his license, but I did.
And i knew that not only he'd be a danger to himself but he could cause an accident which could injure a child ... or worse.
What do you think about this? Considering that the public transportation is poor in USA compared to Europe.
This discussion came up because one of my co-workers today went to the funeral of his cousin who was killed by an old driver who was driving a truck.
That is indeed a dilemma, because driving skills can vary regardless of age. My father was a safe driver until he died at 95. And female drivers probably should be tested at 75 :^)
Perhaps our society needs to develop the idea that it is okay and even right to report unsafe drivers to the authorities, just as they should report unsafe gunowners.
Very good point army. Let's blame the women. It's their fault.
Basically what you're telling me with that "report" comment is that it's going to be business as usual.
Alright. Always a pleasure and see you next time on the next topic.![]()
What about this? What is the strongest or most basic argument against allowing illegal immigration?
The fact that you have to make an argument for this is why Trump won!
The left has no common sense anymore and I hope they get a clue from this massive defeat but I guess a basic argument is what I told a liberal who was here in this forum a few months ago.
Do you leave the door of your house open for anyone to come in?
No?
Okay, now apply that to a nation.