Yes, but only if we are baptized in His Identity (that is, His Name), right?Is it not written that we are crucified with Him?
Yes, but only if we are baptized in His Identity (that is, His Name), right?Is it not written that we are crucified with Him?
I do not personally believe all who believe Jesus and have not been baptized are barred from the Kingdom and the KingYes, but only if we are baptized in His Identity (that is, His Name), right?
I recommend all to avoid judging others to condemnation over this baptism bruha, we are not authorized to do such. Perhaps some are, but they know who they are.
Either you believe all books of the whole Holy Bible are Divinely inspired or you don't, it's as simple as that.
Sorry if you believe I have said otherwise. God bless you.I don't see that anyone is authorized to declare anyone 'unbaptized' because there is no evidence of water, especially when there is clear evidence of the spirit. The thief was baptized in Jesus Name, as evidence in his deed of saying, "remember me, when you enter your kingdom." He clearly was fully acknowledged, and was immersed in, the truth of Jesus' Identity as (his) Lord and (his) Saviour.
I do not know which translation/version you are talking about, and you are more interested in lying about it than letting me know.You know exactly what I mean, I read all the books of the whole Holy Bible.
I don't see that anyone is authorized to declare anyone 'unbaptized' because there is no evidence of water, especially when there is clear evidence of the spirit. The thief was baptized in Jesus Name, as evidence in his deed of saying, "remember me, when you enter your kingdom." He clearly was fully acknowledged, and was immersed in, the truth of Jesus' Identity as (his) Lord and (his) Saviour.
Which books? .![]()
It really is interesting, how Jasher, is basically an outline of Genesis, and Genesis, then gives us the full complete details. Almost like the Book of Hebrews outlines the entire Old and New Testaments + Honor Roll Selection of Saints. Kind of odd, how it could not be considered not Inspired. It really is a Book of Hebrews, just Genesis style.Jasher, Enoch to name a couple. There's also a few kings chronicles
Where does the bible say that baptism is symbolicMaking Water Baptism a requirement for Salvation, when the Bible tells us it is Symbolic at best, seems pretty dang WOKE to me!!
You know exactly the whole Bible I am talking about; you claiming to be ignorant when you know better isn't fooling anyone.I do not know which translation/version you are talking about, and you are more interested in lying about it than letting me know.
You know exactly the whole Bible I am talking about; you claiming to be ignorant when you know better isn't fooling anyone.
You feigning ignorance of there being multiple translations, versions, and languages the BibleYou know exactly the whole Bible I am talking about; you claiming to be ignorant when you know better isn't fooling anyone.
There is only 1 whole Holy Bible.You feigning ignorance of there being multiple translations, versions, and languages the Bible
is published in does not fool anyone. Why you wish to pretend otherwise is anyone's guess.
Perhaps you read a Catholic Bible with uninspired books in it. How would I know?
What I do know is that you refuse to be honest about this.
Magenta has an aversion to the whole Holy Bible.I can assure you, Magenta isn't ignorant, nor pretending to be. She's completely honest, direct and above that kind of foolishness. She is more than well versed in the Word. Yes, the Bible is inspired, it contains no errors. But a relative once gave my mother a Bible that had the books Sis. Mag mentioned which are not inspired. That is her point, plain and simple. I don't see what you're not getting.
I think he is being cagey because his motives are deceptive.Which one is that?
There is only 1 whole Holy Bible. All books of the whole Holy Bible are Divinely inspired; my motives are PURE.I think he is being cagey because his motives are deceptive.
I can assure you, Magenta isn't ignorant, nor pretending to be. She's completely honest, direct and above that kind of foolishness. She is more than well versed in the Word. Yes, the Bible is inspired, it contains no errors. But a relative once gave my mother a Bible that had the books Sis. Mag mentioned which are not inspired. That is her point, plain and simple. I don't see what you're not getting.
Which one is that?