Look at the Mountains behind the fire, mountains produce winds I've never experienced in the Midwest.
This was before it jumped into my windbreak and came at my house and buildings.
I never really knew that name before, but I find it interesting.
Job, the bible claims was a Righteous man. so Parham is Wrong on that account!What I find interesting about Parham is the same man who claimed that signs and wonders had resumed in 1901 also wrote in 1902 that if you don't preach signs and wonders as part of the gospel you're in danger of damnation from God.
In the same book (A Voice Crying in the Wilderness, 1902) he makes some truly ridiculous claims. He says Job was a sinner and that's why God sent catastrophe on him. He was dragged down by his godless wife who told him to curse God and die. He says the cyclone hit the house where his children were eating and drinking wine because they were partying and dancing. Then he says—you can't make this stuff up—they would probably belong to a "fashionable" church that allows dancing and theater-going; and surely wouldn't blame their godless behavior for their trouble but would have a rational explanation: it was merely a cyclone.
I wonder what Parham would think of the churches he spawned which permit every form of carnality and sensuality in the churches. But the apple doesn't fall far from the tree: today they make up equally ridiculous stories by twisting the scripture; nothing much has changed there.
It seems to me more people would want to know the origins of the church they attend.
"Some people say to us, was Job a sinner, did he suffer for sin? We answer, Yes; whatsoever a man soweth that shall he also reap. The Word of God says, Be not unequally yoked together with unbelievers. Because of her beauty or some other reason, Job married afoolish and ungodly woman, who told him to curse God and die. She had raised [for] him an ungodly family, who, when the cyclone struck the house were wining and dancing. Truly they may have belonged to a fashionable church where dancing and theatre-going were permitted; the harm was not in these innocent (?) amusements but in that miserable cyclone!"—A Voice Crying in the Wilderness, pg. 42 (underlining added)
I was raised Pentecostal, but Independent, no Denomination Connection. I dated a girl around my age, when I was 20, whose father was and still is an AOG Pastor. Discussing the Bible with him was useless. He reminded me of what I read about Hitler. If your ideas did not match his according to his interpretation of the Word of God, he would scream at you and demean you. I will just say this much, he lost quite a bit in his life since then. Even softened up. But those AoG people in the 1990's were difficult to be around.

No Parham is not the main guy LOL. His work is noted yet Rev. William Seymour was just as influential if not more. Are you a member of aog? because if you are you lack historical information of their founding.If the antichrist and false prophet will perform great lying signs and wonders, what will
Would it surprise you to know Charles Fox Parham is considered by the Assemblies of God to be their main guy in the founding of Pentecostalism? He's also revered by many today who promote signs and wonders. I wonder if they even know the things their hero believed and wrote.
I was raised Pentecostal, but Independent, no Denomination Connection. I dated a girl around my age, when I was 20, whose father was and still is an AOG Pastor. Discussing the Bible with him was useless. He reminded me of what I read about Hitler. If your ideas did not match his according to his interpretation of the Word of God, he would scream at you and demean you. I will just say this much, he lost quite a bit in his life since then. Even softened up. But those AoG people in the 1990's were difficult to be around.
First of All, I attended the AoG Conference held in Indianapolis every years I dated that woman. Secondly, I attended the AoG Bible University in Lakeland, Florida (still going strong and you can look it up). Thirdly, I could have been Ordained through the AoG. I did say, 1990's. And WHO ARE YOU to know the Character of that man?Ridiculous, you use your personal experience to lambast all of the aog? Then like us to Hitler? I think you can disagree but to associate us with a Nazi when we have never even in your disagreement said you were not saved at least I have not. This is way out of line and opinionated and hateful.
You are incapable of making a point biblically you have to mock and scoff. I will report to you to admin.
First of All, I attended the AoG Conference held in Indianapolis every years I dated that woman. Secondly, I attended the AoG Bible University in Lakeland, Florida (still going strong and you can look it up). Thirdly, I could have been Ordained through the AoG. I did say, 1990's. And WHO ARE YOU to know the Character of that man?
You are Nothing to me that I should be concerned by YOUR MISUNDERSTANDING of calling out one single man and making an example of him and his private flock.I don't believe you. Anyone can go to a conference if you could have been ordained then, then you were a certified minister or licensed with AOG. You should know the 16 fundamental truths of AOG. All 16 are biblically supported.
in addition to a positional letter on the topics of tongues and Spiritual Gifts for Ministry.
YOu say every year that "I date that woman", sounds like you have disdain for her.
Men's Conference - Indiana District Assemblies of God
https://www.indianaag.org › ministries › mens-conference
INDIANA DISTRICT ASSEMBLIES OF GOD. 8750 Purdue Road, Indianapolis, Indiana 46268. Phone 317-872-9812 . Fax 317-879-3619. CONTACT US HERE >>.
I don't believe you. Anyone can go to a conference if you could have been ordained then, then you were a certified minister or licensed with AOG. You should know the 16 fundamental truths of AOG. All 16 are biblically supported.
in addition to a positional letter on the topics of tongues and Spiritual Gifts for Ministry.
YOu say every year that "I date that woman", sounds like you have disdain for her.
Both of you calm down and think in other places. Both of you have a point.
In my opinion, there is some truth in what you say.
First, a priest who describes an AOG minister From his point of view.
Second, another thinks that this man has judged all AOG.
Maybe the two of you began to get angry.
No matter which reason touches the bottom line of your anger, please first learn not to be angry, which is taught by the Bible.
we live in peace,and talk in peace .
Then both of you calm down and see if things are as serious as you think.
I think they were back then when the gospel being preached was at it's starting point but for today no
thank you but I am not angry, but the truth is not being told. first off who is Prest? Second, he has used his experience to suggest AOG is teaching things unbiblical. There are people who spoke at an event for the AOG who said things that were wrong and many of them when corrected Left the AOG as did:
Jimmy Swaggart
Jim Baker
Bill Johnson
K Copeland came out of Church of God
as did K. Hagan
those above would not submit to the leadership for correction or biblical truth the AOG has required for all AOG ministers which I am one. They became rebels.
MANY today will not have credentials with the AOG because we have a very strict requirement.
1. you can't pastor and be divorced unless it was before salvation
2. any pornography at all you must step down for no less than two years. Jimmy Swaggart would not do that so he left.
3. we are an assembly of fellowships not a denomination.
4. we have 16 fundamental truths that we hold to and many positional letters on many topics.
With all of this just like judas, we have those who go rogue. The baptist has this issue too as we see the SBC have almost embraced CRT. and many other mainline churches.
The thread topic is
Are miracles a necessary part of the the gospel?
I have answered yes. and provided a biblical answer. I am not the one who attacked those who I disagree with I only responded to the untruthful assertion made by some.
There are many wonderful men and women who disagree and they are saved and welcome to their belief. They were not rude or scoffing or mocking others as some here have. You look at the ones and you will see.