She is merging the covenants into her own contract which is exactly what the old covenant butchers do which is why you’re all here supporting her.
To “proclaim” you are saved is a proclamation. If she doesn’t mean what she says then better she not say anything at all.
The old covenant was read into the ears of the people and they acknowledged it with a vocal proclamation. That has nothing to do with the New Covenant. The New Covenant is not read into the ears of the people and it is not acknowledged by a vocal proclamation but by the Holy Spirit… It’s not like magic where one says “hocus-pocus” and they are saved. But many pull the “confess with your lips” scripture out of context and as a result there are millions of deviants running around who think they are saved contrasting the old covenant butchers who think they are saved by their make-believe contracts. I really don’t know which is worse but they both lead to the same end.
I understand people would want the covenants of God in separate categories. I don’t think that is what is being presented in this thread. All the covenants before Christ were broken because “works” never made the grade. Today, covenants can be broken because “words” only will never make the grade either.
I know that it’s a hard thing to comprehend that the new covenant can be broken. It is clear to me now that the OP reveals this. Let’s quote the verse you mentioned and take it out of context to show the human nature you are revealing.
Romans 10:9 (KJV)
[SUP]9 [/SUP]That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved.
It doesn’t say.
Romans 10:9 (KJV)
[SUP]9 [/SUP]That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth that Jesus saves, and shalt say this with an insincere heart even if you know that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved.
They still confess with their mouth, which makes the covenant binding. The covenant always has stipulations in scripture if it s broken. We read in the Bible over and over how covenants were broken. Now neither the Father, or the Son will break the covenant established in Christ, but humans can, and will. If we weren’t involved, this great and final covenant would never be broken, or even necessary. The OP makes it clear that when we voice agreement, we are involved in covenant with whomever we agreed with. I think the truth of it all points toward this.
Matthew 15:8 (KJV)
[SUP]8 [/SUP]This people draweth nigh unto me with their mouth, and honoureth me with
their lips; but their heart is far from me.
Last but not least there is a parable Jesus taught. A man asked his first son to go to work, and the son refused but later repented. The other son said he would go to work and never did. The second son agreed with what the father said, and broke that agreement but not doing what the father asked of him. That is a covenant/agreement that is broken, not buy the father, but by a liar.
Matthew 21:28-31.
Bottom line, the covenant in Christ can be broken, and some (professing only) Christians today refuse to acknowledge this truth. The failure to acknowledge this is due to a proud heart, and a holier than thou attitude. So when we confess that we are saved, we are bound to the covenant despite our insincerity. We have hell to pay without a repentant heart. Salvation is current, not a thing of he past,