Can a Christian believe in Noahs flood not being Universal?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
eternally-gratefull said:
1. Israel was not even created, or a nation yet. At this time, it was not even the focus of the bible
2. The bible says ALL LIFE except life on the ark was destroyed
3. If it was not worldwide, Then how did the water go above above the tallest mountain and not flood the restof the world?
4. After the flood, we have Babel (Again Not Israel) and the movement of men to the rest of the earth (God prety much forced them, which if there was man elswhere he would not have to)

There is just fat to much evidence to prove a world wide flood...
Click to expand...

I have just about decided to not even address the drivel of any poster when it totally contradicts the word...........these people do nothing but cast doubt on the word of God.......very contrary to the truth.....
 
  • Like
Reactions: eternally-gratefull
Hevosmies said:
Is there any evidence for "cavemen"?
Some people who know me sure believe I exist :D
Click to expand...

NONE............zero, nadda, nil, zilch, nothing.............any and all who promote such crap might as well leave this site and go to a website that promotes evolution and or a site that peddles that we came from apes or some electrified protein filled pool of sludge......
 
  • Like
Reactions: eternally-gratefull
Hevosmies said:
Uhh. Paintings in a cave are evidence of cavemen?

I can go into a cave right now and paint something or carve something to the stones. NEXT
Click to expand...

Circular reasoning <-------evolutionists LOVE it...........we can all dance in a circle singing Kum Ba Yah while making conclusions upon nothing factual and then pat ourselves on the back like we know something.......
 
dcontroversal said:
Circular reasoning <-------evolutionists LOVE it...........we can all dance in a circle singing Kum Ba Yah while making conclusions upon nothing factual and then pat ourselves on the back like we know something.......
Click to expand...
You wanna talk about a safe job to have? evolutionary professor is as easy as it gets. Make things up as you go along. Throw in some fancy words to confuse the masses.
 
Hevosmies said:
Oy vey.

The cardon dating has been proven to be INACCURATE at best.
Click to expand...
Thanks for proving you don't have a rebuttal to early human fossils. Nor are you aware of the information contained in the links concerning dating cave art.
 
Lillywolf said:
Thanks for proving you don't have a rebuttal to early human fossils. Nor are you aware of the information contained in the links concerning dating cave art.
Click to expand...
I didnt claim to have a rebuttal now did I?

See thats the difference.

I couldnt care less about what these luciferians come up with. I care about what the Bible teaches about human origins and I WILL STICK WITH THAT. I dont care what ANYONE says.
I'll never back down, not one step back. Until I draw my last breath no matter the condition, I will NEVER believe in evolution and deny creation and biblical human origins.

It does bother me quite a bit that christians are willing to downplay what the Bible teaches because some secular scientists found something somewhere
 
  • Like
Reactions: dcontroversal
Hevosmies said:
I didnt claim to have a rebuttal now did I?

See thats the difference.

I couldnt care less about what these luciferians come up with. I care about what the Bible teaches about human origins and I WILL STICK WITH THAT. I dont care what ANYONE says.
I'll never back down, not one step back. Until I draw my last breath no matter the condition, I will NEVER believe in evolution and deny creation and biblical human origins.

It does bother me quite a bit that christians are willing to downplay what the Bible teaches because some secular scientists found something somewhere
Click to expand...

AMEN.....like a partial tooth or half a jaw bone.....BINGO WE HAVE AN EARLY HOMINID.....and "FER SURE" it is the originator of the HUMAN SPECIES.......have another joint!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
To know where humans come from one needs to study the property's of dirt on earth and what those elements that make up dirt.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dcontroversal
Hevosmies said:
I didnt claim to have a rebuttal now did I?
Click to expand...
Of course you did.

See thats the difference.
Click to expand...
No, actually it is the same ideology that makes for some Christians to appear incredibly backward in their beliefs. You mock archeology and then deny proof that counters your unsubstantiated claims doesn't exist.


I couldnt care less about what these luciferians come up with.
Click to expand...
That's also not true. If that were the case you wouldn't insert yourself into this thread in the way you do so as to assail people with name calling.

I care about what the Bible teaches about human origins and I WILL STICK WITH THAT. I dont care what ANYONE says.
I'll never back down, not one step back. Until I draw my last breath no matter the condition, I will NEVER believe in evolution and deny creation and biblical human origins.

It does bother me quite a bit that christians are willing to downplay what the Bible teaches because some secular scientists found something somewhere
Click to expand...
Actually Christian is Capitalized as a proper noun.

What you are unaware of is that there are Christian Geologists.


"
The age of the earth is a question both of biblical interpretation and scientific investigation. Unfortunately, neither Christian conservative Old Testament scholars nor Christian scientists are in universal agreement. This topic covers a broad spectrum of issues so I am going to try and narrow the focus of the discussion. I will first briefly discuss the biblical aspects of the question, then move on to geology, the flood, and the Grand Canyon.

First, how do the "young-earth" and "old-earth" positions view the Scriptures? Let me emphasize right at the start that both young- earth and old-earth creationists bring a reverent and submissive attitude to Genesis. The difference is a matter of interpretation. Well-known young-earth creationists Henry Morris, Duane Gish, and Steve Austin, from the Institute for Creation Research, interpret the days of Genesis 1 as literal 24-hours days, the genealogies of Genesis 5 and 11 as consecutive or nearly consecutive generations, and the flood as a universal, catastrophic event. This leaves little room for much more than ten to thirty thousand years as the true age of the earth. " Excerpt From:
The Grand Canyon and the Age of the Earth
 
Lillywolf said:
What you are unaware of is that there are Christian Geologists.


"
The age of the earth is a question both of biblical interpretation and scientific investigation. Unfortunately, neither Christian conservative Old Testament scholars nor Christian scientists are in universal agreement. This topic covers a broad spectrum of issues so I am going to try and narrow the focus of the discussion. I will first briefly discuss the biblical aspects of the question, then move on to geology, the flood, and the Grand Canyon.

First, how do the "young-earth" and "old-earth" positions view the Scriptures? Let me emphasize right at the start that both young- earth and old-earth creationists bring a reverent and submissive attitude to Genesis. The difference is a matter of interpretation. Well-known young-earth creationists Henry Morris, Duane Gish, and Steve Austin, from the Institute for Creation Research, interpret the days of Genesis 1 as literal 24-hours days, the genealogies of Genesis 5 and 11 as consecutive or nearly consecutive generations, and the flood as a universal, catastrophic event. This leaves little room for much more than ten to thirty thousand years as the true age of the earth. " Excerpt From:
The Grand Canyon and the Age of the Earth
Click to expand...
Something being Christian isnt saying much today. The last leader of the US of A was a *Christian* and supported abortion. How about that?

I also take the days in Genesis 1 to be literal 24hour days. YOU KNOW WHY? Because of the pattern established there: Rest on the Sabbath.

The sabbath commandment is given to Israel to rest on the final day of the week (Sabbath), just like God rested then.
Now: If we take it to be figurative instead of 24hour days. Are we to work 50 centuries, THEN rest one century?
 
And here we are back in the garden hearing those words again.....did God say?
 
The problem is to assume the Hebrew Adam is the first man ever. He wasn't.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back