I am an old Earth creationist, so would not bet on 6,000 years.Well God made the world - including mosquitoes - but what we have right now is NOT the world the way it was when God made it.
Some things that are most annoying were designed to be an integral part of the world and its functions. But sin messes lots of things up. I'm guessing if scientists were able to trace when that genetic defect in mosquitoes happened, they would trace it back about 6,000 years. =^.^=
Cats.... Atleast they keep pest away. Dogs really don't do anything by nature, except eat and poop.
![]()
i just cannot believe dogs are ahead of cats.
ON THE INTERNET!
Wow. Are you saying you prefer cats to dogs? I do believe this is the end of a beautiful friendship. And I thought you were such a sensible person!
Or, eat poop.... which is a dog thing.
I know how you feel. We once lived with three indoor animals. Two dogs and a cat. A big dog and a little dog. Sometimes I'd come out of my room and catch the big dog eating out of the litter box. Gross indeed.Sorry Stunnedbygrace... I tried to like that post because it was really clever, but I just... I just can't! It was clever though. But every time my mom threw out the litter box our dog would be on point to raid it, and it always disgusted me.
Sorry Stunnedbygrace... I tried to like that post because it was really clever, but I just... I just can't! It was clever though. But every time my mom threw out the litter box our dog would be on point to raid it, and it always disgusted me.
Yeah but that kind of "green" has a tendency to turn human faces green... >.>Its okay, not everyone likes a green dog
I grew up with both cats and dogs, so I like both. I give the edge to dogs because dogs love their people. A dog would die to protect its human, a cat would not. There have been stories of dogs refusing to leave their owners’ graves. This type of devotion and love is not found in cats. I know that dogs are not for everyone. Their affection can be smothery and too much to deal with, cats’ periodic need of affection may be preferable since it is not demanding. Plus, the constant devotion of a dog may be seen as valueless, because it is always there. A cat’s affection is not so reliable, it is more variable, so may be seen as more valuable when the cat deigns to give affection to his human.
I will say that people who prefer cats often think they are more intelligent than the hoi poloi who prefer dogs (I am referring to hipsters).
*Trying to comprehend*
Uhhhhhh...? Ummmm...huh...?
Not trying to sound disrespectful...but why do you think so? :/
I did not impugn WineRose, as far as I know. The only people I dissed were hipsters.This thread just made a strange turn. Again thanks to Galatea. You have an unique way of saying something that provokes and makes a whole new dimension to the discussion.
As for intelligence and pets, I don't really think it matters alot. It is more about personality as intelligence. Like it is no surprise I like Retrievers, and, at least for me, it wasn't a surprise Yahweh is gracious has a Doberman. And Bella to Mailmandan certainly suits him, too. And yes. Cats suits to Winerose. She is intelligent, but did she ever claim to be smarter because of the cat preference? No.