Charity / welfare

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Alright. This right here is just nuts.

You're putting words into my mouth. I or no-one else has advocated genocide here. So be rational.

The bible verses you have quoted are very nice. But they do not prohibit Christians from using eugenics policies to help people.

Demonic? oh please....

You said in another post that poverty is a social problem, not a genetic one. I mostly agree. Some poverty is clearly inherited. Even if most poverty is a social problem, I still advocate sterilisation.

Why do people see giving birth as a right? And not a priveledge? Something to be respected. Something to be done by responsible people in sustainable situations... Yes I know what you're thinking... Sometimes it just happens, its not planned. Well, try as I might, I can't sympathise with people who find sex/marriage difficult to avoid. Its easy to avoid. You just don't do it. Especially if you don't know what you're going to eat for breakfast tomorrow. See, some of these people don't know what's good for them, they can't make their own decisions. They need our help. So long as we guarantee their breakfast tomorrow with no strings attached, they will go on producing more people who depend on us for food, and generations will be brought up this way. Its unsustainable.

Your threads seem to become more......... morbid as time goes by, HOWEVER i agree with you on this post.

I think there should be a test, if you fail and its been proved your a total retard, you shouldn't be allowed to have kids. I personally dont want retards breeding other retards just to breed even more retards.
People think because they have reproductive organs its okay to have 20 kids and live in a porta potty.
I dont know how things go in Australia luke, but in the u.s. the more kids you have the more you can mooch off the government. You can have 65 children all of you livin undeer a bridge, but your gettin 2,000 dollars worth of food stamps everymonth. I mean you might only have one pair of draws that you been wearin for the past 7 years, but your not gonna be thinkin about the doodoo smell comin from your pants, or the homeless man that lives under the bridge with you, who just defacated next to your 200 dollar steak..... your eaten like the rich and famous now....livin under a bridge with 65 kids all named ed seems like nothing in comparrison to the kinda food you can always have.

I have to go now... i just figured out whats wrong with our government.. i have to write somebody about this.
 
Wow.

Over reactions people.... relax...

Whenever the word 'eugenics' is mentioned, people are so quick to mention the words: Hittler, Stalin, genocide, murder, death, etc. etc..

its their word.

Yes, eugenics can be done in different ways, but never have I advocated actively killing anyone. Zone, you're overreacting. Ask yourself, how many people are YOU letting die right now by sitting there at your computer? That's the same as going into the wilderness and preaching the gospel to starving, dying people and not giving them the apple in your backpack. You're not giving them anything right now. Neither would I be. Except, I'd be giving them a chance to meet Jesus...

sharp....please don't play bait & switch ok?
"letting people" die is not even in the same class as sterilizing them or advocating hard or soft eugencis.

so.....go preach the gospel quickly before the states kill off the people then (?). what's stopping you?
you don't know what i do with my time sharp.

In my opinion, there's "hard" eugenics: genocide, murder, forced sterilisations, abortion, etc., and "soft" eugenics: voluntary or persuaded sterilisations, incentives for breeding or not breeding, selecting gender of babies, IVF, etc....

what you don't get is that NO ONE has the right to make those decisions for anyone else.
history shows where this leads every single time.

if people have themselves voluntarily sterilized that's their business. not yours or the state's.

something else you don't seem to grasp is that there is a 'class' of people keeping 'those imbicles and misfits and poor people' in that condition. so you break the horse's legs then shoot it because it can't get up?

that same class is already sterilizing the masses without their consent or knowledge through a multitude of means (including the anglo american middle classes.....research fertility rates in american males). this is "soft" eugenics. is this what you say is okay?

'incentives' for not 'breeding' - what's with the animal husbandry term?
do you not know man is created in the image of God?

and please tell me what those 'incentives' would be and through whom would they be administered?

you can find old Youtubes/propaganda/'informational' videos made by the eugenics fanatics in the US. they are real, not parody or hollywood.

Hard eugenics is obviously against the bible, for it involves murder/abuse (even though forced sterilisation would be good for people in the long run. Yes, I'm saying that people don't know what's best for themselves sometimes). .

this means forcible arrest and confinement, and criminal assault on the body of another, with permanent damage done.

please tell me: would their be a court decision? how would the ones be chosen for sterilization?
what are the criteria (today...which would rapidly change by tomorrow)?

too many kids? not a high enough IQ? poverty? a criminal record?
who gets forcibly sterilized and who doesn't?

people don't know what's best for them...but you or some unknown council of 'experts' does?
history shows exactly where this goes.

and it can NEVER happen without the consent of people who think like you.

Zone, if any of my family members were considering breeding irresponsibly, I would encourage them not to..

what is "breeding irresponsibly sharp'? can you get really specific on that please?

If they had serious genetic diseases, I would encourage them not to breed...

such as?
what diseases. please be specific.

If they were somehow STARVING to death and had no access to contraception, I would strongly encourage them to sterilise themselves, in fact I would pay for it. .

if they were starving to death your first concern would be sterilization?
how about food?

then a hand out of their condition...like education and training and such?

why would you be so anxious to pay for the sterilization of your OWN starving family?
are you for real?

YES, I could bankroll their irresponsible breeding and pay to feed their children, or I could do something for them with much more long term value. If their situation improved, I would encourage them to adopt an African. Then hopefully one less African would grow up starving, practising voodoo, dying, and going to hell..

this is just bizarre.

you know sharp....i do not know your current living standard.
but the day may come when you lose it ALL...in fact that day is coming.
because there are powers at work ENSURING it happens. and you will regret this kind of mindset.

for by then, enough people may have agreed with eugenics thinking (green-lighting the death cult already hard at it) so that sterilizing you won't be good enough.

you'll given a bullet to the temple.
if you think this is over-reacting, you know ZERO.

Abortion is not compassionate. Everyone knows that..

abortion is gruesome murder.

Genocide is not compassionate. Eugenics can be. Why should we allow people to be born to go straight to hell when they die of malaria at age 29? ..

well i suppose you are very fotunate to have been saved.
now we ought to simply dispense with the rest of mankind.

can't get the gospel to them in time, so soft kill is the next best alternative.

someone might have reached them with the gospel before they were snuffed out...but oh well.

We should stop these people from ever existing. .

please carefully list who "these people" are.

What I believe, is that if God wants a person to be born, they will be born, regardless of what eugenicists do..

um...what?
so God is going to miraculously undo sterilization in order to bring forth a child from someone a eugenicist sterilized by force?

A "person" consists of their soul; their body is the earthly host. God could easily put the soul into another body who is instead born on the other side of the world, in, say, downtown New Jersey, once a body in Africa is prevented from breeding..

THIS IS SICKENING AND DISGRACEFUL AND I END THIS CONVERSATION HERE.

God help you.
 
Jesus did say that the compassion for others will grow cold, i honestly thought that He was speaking about only those in the world not the body of Christ, wow, was i wrong i stand corrected :o

no wonder the world looks at Christians as no better than themselves
 
the difference between "soft eugenics" and "hard eugenics"

is the difference between "soft slavery of a house slave" and "hard slavery of a field slave"

one just has a better mask.

Proverbs 22:2
The rich and the poor have this in common, The LORD is the maker of them all.

Proverbs 28:11
The rich man is wise in his own eyes, But the poor who has understanding searches him out

2 Corinthians 8:9
For you know the grace of our Lord Jesus Christ, that though He was rich, yet for your sakes He became poor, that you through His poverty might become rich.

James 2:5
Listen, my beloved brethren: Has God not chosen the poor of this world to be rich in faith and heirs of the kingdom which He promised to those who love Him?
James 2

Beware of Personal Favoritism

1 My brethren, do not hold the faith of our Lord Jesus Christ, the Lord of glory, with partiality. 2 For if there should come into your assembly a man with gold rings, in fine apparel, and there should also come in a poor man in filthy clothes, 3 and you pay attention to the one wearing the fine clothes and say to him, “You sit here in a good place,” and say to the poor man, “You stand there,” or, “Sit here at my footstool,” 4 have you not shown partiality among yourselves, and become judges with evil thoughts?
5 Listen, my beloved brethren: Has God not chosen the poor of this world to be rich in faith and heirs of the kingdom which He promised to those who love Him? 6 But you have dishonored the poor man. Do not the rich oppress you and drag you into the courts? 7 Do they not blaspheme that noble name by which you are called?
8 If you really fulfill the royal law according to the Scripture, “You shall love your neighbor as yourself,”[a] you do well; 9 but if you show partiality, you commit sin, and are convicted by the law as transgressors.

Clarification:

I am not against educating people and encouraging them to limit their sexual immorality that causes children to be born in horrible conditions. I would advocate marriage and good family values, NOT forced sterilization of the poor. It is wrong to advocate abortion or sterilization of families because of genetic disorders. Did Jesus speak on genetic disorders? do you remember this story? The poor, the blind, the disabled are here as a test and a testimony against this world and its sinful nature. It reveals to the Earth and the Heavens the heart of those who truly seek God and follow His Spirit. Will they be sheep or will they be goats?

John 9

1 Now as Jesus passed by, He saw a man who was blind from birth. 2 And His disciples asked Him, saying, “Rabbi, who sinned, this man or his parents, that he was born blind?”
3 Jesus answered, “Neither this man nor his parents sinned, but that the works of God should be revealed in him. 4 I[a] must work the works of Him who sent Me while it is day; the night is coming when no one can work. 5 As long as I am in the world, I am the light of the world.”
6 When He had said these things, He spat on the ground and made clay with the saliva; and He anointed the eyes of the blind man with the clay. 7 And He said to him, “Go, wash in the pool of Siloam” (which is translated, Sent). So he went and washed, and came back seeing.
 
Jesus did say that the compassion for others will grow cold, i honestly thought that He was speaking about only those in the world not the body of Christ, wow, was i wrong i stand corrected :o

no wonder the world looks at Christians as no better than themselves

keep him in your prayers Consumed

perhaps if he finds a church to attend, he can break free of the lies who ever is pumping his head full of eugenics propoganda is trying to brainwash him to supporting. he posted a prayer request that God help him find a good church in the prayer forum since he hasn't attended in a year.

ok Sharp, I'm sorry if you think I'm over reacting and putting words in your mouth. I don't know what YOU specifically believe but I have heard enough other eugenic supports to be strongly opposed to the idea in whatever form it may try to disguise itself behind.

I see some of your points but I do not think they are eugenics but basic family planning and welfare reform.

I don't think people should get a free meal if they can work. I think there should be a cap on the support any one family has no matter how many kids to prevent people misusing the system and having kids just to get more money. Welfare reform I agree with but the answer is not eugenics.

I believe if we actually had a welfare system based upon the basic tenets in the Bible it would look totally different. For example the concept of working for your daily bread and not being busy bodies and not mooching off of people is found in the Bible. It also tells you not to let people take advantage of you and eat off your hard work that the concept of charity is based upon community and working together and sharing resources not so much an endless give from one party and take from another.

there are lazy poor and lazy rich people, the only difference is education and family connections. both mooch off others instead of working, both are parasites upon society however the lazy rich people like to distract others from them and their actions by villianizing their poor brethren who do exactly like themselves just don't have the family legacy of money and power to enslave others to do their biding as easily.

Why are movie stars paid more than nurses?

who takes care of you when you are ill?
 
November 01, 2011
A dozen nurses have filed a lawsuit against a hospital run by the University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey over a plan that would coerce them to help with abortions, and they want an injunction right away as the hospital has scheduled them to be in the operating rooms as early as Friday.

http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=363081

​
 
Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet.com
Monday, December 6, 2010

Just months after a leaked UN blueprint that revealed climate change alarmists would start pushing “overpopulation” fears in favor of the discredited mantra of global warming as a means of dismantling the middle class, billionaire globalist Ted Turner followed suit during a Cancun luncheon yesterday when he urged the world to adopt China’s brutal one-child policy, and even suggested poor people should be sterilized in return for government handouts.

Following a speech by economist Brian O&#8217;Neill from the U.S.&#8217;s National Center for Atmospheric Research which &#8220;concluded that a rapidly rising global population is contributing to an acceleration of emission growth,&#8221; Uncle Ted stepped in to remind us that mere slaves should not aspire to follow his example of having five children, restricting themselves to one or being made to face the wrath of a Chinese-style one child policy, which sends women who defy its edicts to &#8220;re-education camps,&#8221; once they have been beaten, forcibly injected <SNIPPED...too horrible to post> of course.

&#8220;Mr. Turner &#8211; a long-time advocate of population control &#8211; said the environmental stress on the Earth requires radical solutions, suggesting countries should follow China&#8217;s lead in instituting a one-child policy to reduce global population over time. He added that fertility rights could be sold so that poor people could profit from their decision not to reproduce,&#8221; reports the Globe and Mail.

The secret behind Turner&#8217;s call for western nations to enforce a tyrannical policy that in China is administered by undercover police and &#8220;family planning&#8221; authorities who kidnap, force drug and then forcibly abort babies of pregnant women, has nothing whatsoever to do with his concern for the environment.

Turner himself has five children and owns no less than 2 million acres of land. He is the largest private landowner on the planet, falling short of only the royal families of Europe. Turner has publicly advocated shocking population reduction programs that would cull the human population by a staggering 95%, a figure only achievable by outright genocide, mass abortion and infanticide.

In the third world, Turner has contributed literally billions to population reduction, namely through United Nations programs, leading the way for the likes of Bill & Melinda Gates and Warren Buffet (Gates&#8217; father has long been a leading board member of Planned Parenthood and a top eugenicist). Gates himself has given speeches in which he promotes the use of vaccines and abortion as a means of reducing global population and lowering CO2 emissions.

Quite how an improvement in health care through vaccines that supposedly save lives would lead to a lowering in global population is an oxymoron, unless Gates was referring to vaccines that sterilize people, which is precisely the same method advocated in White House science advisor John P. Holdren&#8217;s 1977 textbook Ecoscience, which calls for a dictatorial &#8220;planetary regime&#8221; to enforce draconian measures of population reduction via all manner of oppressive techniques, including sterilization.

This is what Gates and Turner discussed when they met in secret with the likes of George Soros and David Rockefeller at a private gathering of billionaires in Manhattan last year, a confab focused around how these globalists could use their wealth to &#8220;slow the growth of the world&#8217;s population.&#8221;
As is manifestly provable, the true agenda behind fanning the flames of fears about overpopulation is to reduce living standards globally, by preventing the third world from ever becoming economically prosperous, while also eviscerating the middle classes of western nations. It has nothing whatsoever to do with saving the earth and is merely another convenient trojan horse that globalists invoke to advance their tyranny....

http://www.prisonplanet.com/the-secret-behind-ted-turners-call-for-a-global-one-child-policy.html

oh yes.
we're so concerned about the poor.
and the planet.

people NEVER learn that this plan eventually includes THEM.

the bad guys literally call themselves members of "The Lucky Gene Club".

~

jimmydiggs posted a thread asking if torture was ok.
the very same dialectic: putting the unthinkable on the table (these/antithesis = synthesis) is at work here. convince people the world is overcrowded, and they will agree to dig their neighbours graves.
 
Last edited:
its their word.


sharp....please don't play bait & switch ok?
"letting people" die is not even in the same class as sterilizing them or advocating hard or soft eugencis.

so.....go preach the gospel quickly before the states kill off the people then (?). what's stopping you?
you don't know what i do with my time sharp.

what you don't get is that NO ONE has the right to make those decisions for anyone else.
history shows where this leads every single time.

if people have themselves voluntarily sterilized that's their business. not yours or the state's.

something else you don't seem to grasp is that there is a 'class' of people keeping 'those imbicles and misfits and poor people' in that condition. so you break the horse's legs then shoot it because it can't get up?

that same class is already sterilizing the masses without their consent or knowledge through a multitude of means (including the anglo american middle classes.....research fertility rates in american males). this is "soft" eugenics. is this what you say is okay?

'incentives' for not 'breeding' - what's with the animal husbandry term?
do you not know man is created in the image of God?

and please tell me what those 'incentives' would be and through whom would they be administered?

you can find old Youtubes/propaganda/'informational' videos made by the eugenics fanatics in the US. they are real, not parody or hollywood.

this means forcible arrest and confinement, and criminal assault on the body of another, with permanent damage done.

please tell me: would their be a court decision? how would the ones be chosen for sterilization?
what are the criteria (today...which would rapidly change by tomorrow)?

too many kids? not a high enough IQ? poverty? a criminal record?
who gets forcibly sterilized and who doesn't?

people don't know what's best for them...but you or some unknown council of 'experts' does?
history shows exactly where this goes.

and it can NEVER happen without the consent of people who think like you.

what is "breeding irresponsibly sharp'? can you get really specific on that please?

such as?
what diseases. please be specific.

if they were starving to death your first concern would be sterilization?
how about food?

then a hand out of their condition...like education and training and such?

why would you be so anxious to pay for the sterilization of your OWN starving family?
are you for real?


this is just bizarre.

you know sharp....i do not know your current living standard.
but the day may come when you lose it ALL...in fact that day is coming.
because there are powers at work ENSURING it happens. and you will regret this kind of mindset.

for by then, enough people may have agreed with eugenics thinking (green-lighting the death cult already hard at it) so that sterilizing you won't be good enough.

you'll given a bullet to the temple.
if you think this is over-reacting, you know ZERO.



abortion is gruesome murder.



well i suppose you are very fotunate to have been saved.
now we ought to simply dispense with the rest of mankind.

can't get the gospel to them in time, so soft kill is the next best alternative.

someone might have reached them with the gospel before they were snuffed out...but oh well.



please carefully list who "these people" are.



um...what?
so God is going to miraculously undo sterilization in order to bring forth a child from someone a eugenicist sterilized by force?



THIS IS SICKENING AND DISGRACEFUL AND I END THIS CONVERSATION HERE.

God help you.


God help me? What, because I want people to live decent lives instead of living in poverty? You, on the other hand, would have the population of the world explode unhindered, until such time as we run out of food or destroy eachother with nuclear weapons, just for the sake of everyone having 'equal rights'.

You've responded very naively to some of these points Zone. Prisonplanet.com? Are you serious? I thought we were having a real conversation, not one about conspiracy theories. I'm glad that people with such influence and power as Ted Turner, Bill Gates and Warren Buffet have devoted their time and resources to population control. These are rational men who see a problem and want to solve it, unlike many people, who respond, as you do, only emotionally to such good ideas. China's one child policy is good, but people like you get offended because they think every woman has the right and should be encouraged to have 10 children.

"what you don't get is that NO ONE has the right to make those decisions for anyone else."

I disagree. When uncontrolled population growth impacts on society as a whole, the state, the representative of the people, needs to intervene.

"please tell me what those 'incentives' would be and through whom would they be administered?"

- Food/education in exchange for sterilisation
- Application process for reproduction, demonstrating ability and means to raise a child
- Payment in exchange for sterilisation

You ask how the state would decide who gets to reproduce? There are a number of ways. As with many issues, the government could consult with the people (democracy) as to how they want their society to be. I'm sure this would make some uncomfortable (people who mistrust the state). There are many different possible criteria though:

Murders and rapists should not reproduce
People living in dire poverty should not reproduce
People with debilitating hereditary illnesses should not reproduce

"for by then, enough people may have agreed with eugenics thinking (green-lighting the death cult already hard at it) so that sterilizing you won't be good enough.

you'll given a bullet to the temple.
if you think this is over-reacting, you know ZERO."

Tin foil hats. Go outside and take a breath of fresh air.

"so God is going to miraculously undo sterilization in order to bring forth a child from someone a eugenicist sterilized by force"

No, you misunderstood what I said. I think God primarily is concerned with a person's soul. A person's body is only an earthly host. It is the soul which goes to heaven, not the body. God knew from the beginning of time every soul who would ever exist. Sterilising someone doesn't prevent a soul from existing. It just means that soul won't come into the world as a starving african.

Read this month's Time magazine. Charity food dumping is undercutting african farmers who are actually producing economic growth for Africa. Charity can keep an economy down. It can keep whole nations dependent. I reiterate that having people die as Christians is much more important than having people live happily as healthy atheists.

This is neither sickening nor disgraceful. You're operating under the premise that everyone should have the right to breed uncontrollably and live off the state and private charity. The line has to be drawn somewhere. There are too many people dying needlessly. Eugenics can be very compassionate. It just scares people like you because they think it means that the government wants to kill them.
 
November 01, 2011

A dozen nurses have filed a lawsuit against a hospital run by the University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey over a plan that would coerce them to help with abortions, and they want an injunction right away as the hospital has scheduled them to be in the operating rooms as early as Friday.​





Good! I hope the nurses win! Abortion is a disgrace.

I don't know why there was a need for you to post this article.
 
God help me? What, because I want people to live decent lives instead of living in poverty? .

what a LOAD.
you want people DEAD rather than live in poverty.
at least you're up front about it most of the time.

this is one subject i'll battle til my last breath.

You, on the other hand, would have the population of the world explode unhindered, until such time as we run out of food or destroy eachother with nuclear weapons, just for the sake of everyone having 'equal rights'..

you're totally ignorant of the facts and are toeing the party line every good stazi will.

GOD DECIDES. not you.

you think the GREAT MEN like Rockefeller and Gates have YOUR best interests in mind?
you think they don't control "population science"? John Holdren in charge of SCIENCE at the whitehosue? GIVE ME A BREAK. the guy is a complete monster.

if you have any sense at all you'd do REAL homework instead of swallowing the trash you're fed on tv.

moving populations around via unrestrained immigration, displacing one culture and people group with a mixed wave of another is an ancient WAR technique. its done to dismantle what are perfectly natural tribal and familiar and cultural traditions and units....DIVIDE AND CONQUER.

"multiculturalism" is the word of the day. naturally it doesn't work: people like their own kind and culture and left alone they live side by side quite reasonably. so why do they do it?
to END any culture and make one giant communist state where everyone is exactly the same and obeys the state to the point of spying on the neighbours out of fear of that 2am death squad.

every terrorist regime in the world uses this technique: terrorize the masses into submission via the police state.

they see that death squad arrive and drag out and shoot a family next door for no reason and the message is loud and clear. you may be next, so you better obey.

then that small group of psychos at the top gets the idiots and cowards to do their work for them. in east germany ONE IN FOUR was stazi: private citizen spies who reported their neighbours for insane infractions...suspicions...for nothing at all. many times for money.

eventually these regimes end up with QUOTAS: how many dead today boys? didn't meet your quota? YOU'RE NEXT since you appear DISLOYAL and unwillling to do your duty.

you think that's not coming? GET A CLUE. guys who think like you bring it on.

tony blair made it clear the agenda was to destroy british culture forever. WHY?
because they need a single world govt, and NO individual or family units. but you have NO IDEA what communism or fascism are.

actually...you do. you're promoting them.

if you look at the old Soviet Polit photos, you'll see what were guys who were IN erased from the photos! why? blank spaces where "loyal" stalinist once stood posing.
Stalin or Pol Pot or whichever crackpot was in charge got paranoid and had the guy disappeared. its the same old game.

and it starts by blaming "THOSE PEOPLE" - as long as it is "THOSE PEOPLE" and not me, i'll agree to getting rid of them.

19 islamic extremists did 9-11 (NOT!): therefore....muslims are terrorists....therefore....we now must talk about torture...therefore....is torture okay america?; america says YES - as long as it if for "those people": then what? THE PATRIOT ACT......now YOU are the terroist and you yourself approved your own torture or your neihbour's who cares....as long as it is someone else.

just sickening.

You've responded very naively to some of these points Zone. Prisonplanet.com? Are you serious? I thought we were having a real conversation, not one about conspiracy theories. I'm glad that people with such influence and power as Ted Turner, Bill Gates and Warren Buffet have devoted their time and resources to population control. These are rational men who see a problem and want to solve it, unlike many people, who respond, as you do, only emotionally to such good ideas. China's one child policy is good, but people like you get offended because they think every woman has the right and should be encouraged to have 10 children..

what folly and disgrace.

you just don't get it do you.

you think its about over population. its about haters of God who LOVE DEATH.
but hey: your day is coming. you're making this bed and i GUARANTEE YOU'RE GOING TO SLEEP IN IT.

when the day comes you're lined up next to a mass grave; REMEMBER YOU LOVED THIS IDEA. you were SO GLAD men like Turner and gates were taking control.

"what you don't get is that NO ONE has the right to make those decisions for anyone else."

I disagree. When uncontrolled population growth impacts on society as a whole, the state, the representative of the people, needs to intervene. ..

un controlled population?
WHAT A JOKE!
go get an education.

"please tell me what those 'incentives' would be and through whom would they be administered?"

- Food/education in exchange for sterilisation
- Application process for reproduction, demonstrating ability and means to raise a child
- Payment in exchange for sterilisation.

SATANIC.

You ask how the state would decide who gets to reproduce? There are a number of ways. As with many issues, the government could consult with the people (democracy) as to how they want their society to be. I'm sure this would make some uncomfortable (people who mistrust the state). There are many different possible criteria though:

Murders and rapists should not reproduce
People living in dire poverty should not reproduce
People with debilitating hereditary illnesses should not reproduce.

ya.
it always starts with "those people"

you're on of those people sharp. you'll get your turn.
and all the begging in the world about having agreed with them will do you no good.
they hate you too. they laugh at guys like you: useful idiots they call them.

the useful idiots are the first to go once the power takes hold: unless they prove they are willing to go all the way and be guards in camps that hold their own families.

you'd make a likely candidate. a good obedient fascist.

"for by then, enough people may have agreed with eugenics thinking (green-lighting the death cult already hard at it) so that sterilizing you won't be good enough.

you'll given a bullet to the temple.
if you think this is over-reacting, you know ZERO."

Tin foil hats. Go outside and take a breath of fresh air..

you're wicked. plain and simple.

"so God is going to miraculously undo sterilization in order to bring forth a child from someone a eugenicist sterilized by force"

No, you misunderstood what I said. I think God primarily is concerned with a person's soul. A person's body is only an earthly host. It is the soul which goes to heaven, not the body. God knew from the beginning of time every soul who would ever exist. Sterilising someone doesn't prevent a soul from existing. It just means that soul won't come into the world as a starving african..

who cares what YOU think?
you don't know God.

i posted the NEW JERSEY article to show your sweet choice of axing a black african life in favour of a white american New jersy life means NOTHING to eugenicists.

they hate you. and they are laughing at guys like you.

Read this month's Time magazine. Charity food dumping is undercutting african farmers who are actually producing economic growth for Africa. Charity can keep an economy down. It can keep whole nations dependent. I reiterate that having people die as Christians is much more important than having people live happily as healthy atheists.

This is neither sickening nor disgraceful. You're operating under the premise that everyone should have the right to breed uncontrollably and live off the state and private charity. The line has to be drawn somewhere. There are too many people dying needlessly. Eugenics can be very compassionate. It just scares people like you because they think it means that the government wants to kill them.

ugh.
'scuse me.
i need a bucket to get sick in.

one day you'll be behind barbed wire wondering what happened.
 
Last edited:
You just crossed the line lady.

We can have a discussion, but calling me satanic and telling me I don't know God is going too far.

You must've had some personal experience with this subject to react with this much emotion to it. Maybe that's clouding your views.

Again, you have brought up other things, which I have not even mentioned, such as death - saying I want people dead, genocide, one world government, multiculturalism, etc.

I hate multiculturalism. I've posted about that subject before.

I'm not going to continue this discussion. You're a completely irrational conspiracy theorist.

Goodbye.
 
You just crossed the line lady.

i'm just getting started.

~

Profitable Depopulation Plot Links JP Morgan-Chase
And Goldman Sachs To Vaccination Contaminations
And BigPharma Corruption
By Dr. Leonard Horowitz
4-29-10

A medical investigation into suspicious outbreaks and propaganda used to sell drugs and vaccines has exposed investment bankers at JP Morgan-Chase (JPMC) and Goldman Sachs (GS) for plotting to shock/stress, frighten, poison, and kill billions of people most profitably–pharmaceutically–according to the Editor-in-Chief of Medical Veritas journal.

While researching a powerful Partnership for New York City (PFNYC), uniting Wall Street’s wealthiest industrialists, Harvard-trained public health expert, Dr. Leonard Horowitz, and investigative journalist, Sherri Kane, discovered shocking evidence of a conspiracy to commit global genocide by generating diseases and death to advance profitable pharmaceutical depopulation.

Population planners at the highest levels of government and industry conspired to spread diseases, vaccines, drugs, and death most profitably, according to research published in the latest issue of Medical Veritas.

In a related Special Report posted on YouTube, Dr. Horowitz urged humanitarian organizations and activist groups worldwide to issue investigations, alerts, civil complaints, and criminal charges to stop the pharmaceutical depopulation plot because it risks genetic inheritance, new pandemics, and the possible extinction of the human race.

“Corruption in the drug industry is rampant and transparent,” Dr. Horowitz explains. “Investment bankers at JPMC and GS, who acquired controlling interests in the largest drug firms during mergers and acquisitions, have placed ‘depopulation’ near the top of their list of geopolitical priorites. Their depopulation agents are now in top positions of government, finance, and industry.

The depopulation plan is supported by the world’s wealthiest people, including Bill Gates, who admittedly funds vaccinations to reduce global populations by 10-15%. Leading population planners and economic developers advance identical plans to cull the world’s population to 1 billion.

“Killing 6-out-of-7 people globally, most profitably, requires planning and an unprecedented conspiracy to commit genocide by applying advances in genetic biotechnologies exclusively available and affordable to drug companies controlled by the investment bankers,” Dr. Horowitz adds.

http://birdflu666.wordpress.com/2010/04/30/profitable-depopulation-plot-links-jp-morgan-chase-and-goldman-sachs-to-vaccination-contaminations-by-dr-len-horowitz/
 
UN Calls for Population Control as Global Birthrates Decline

by Bill Saunders | Washington, DC | LifeNews.com | 5/11/11 3:13 PM

At a time when we are experiencing a worldwide decline in birthrates, and many countries find themselves in a demographic crisis that will leave their nations in economic and social ruin if something doesn’t change, the United Nations Populations Fund (UNFPA) continues to call for more population control.

Last week the Population Division of the UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs released a projection that the world population will reach 7 billion on October 31 of this year. The UNFPA used this as an opportunity to call[1] for more family planning services in order to decrease fertility rates worldwide. This is a not so subtle call for more population control.

http://www.lifenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/underpop2.jpgThe call for population control is a false alarm. Birthrates are already dropping worldwide. Many countries have fertility rates that are well below replacement rate.

http://www.lifenews.com/2011/05/11/un-calls-for-population-control-as-global-birthrates-decline/
 
Conclusions
Perinatal exposure to BPA leads to a dose-dependent decline in the reproductive capacity of female mice. The effects on the cumulative number of pups are comparable to those previously reported in mice developmentally exposed to DES, a compound well known to impair reproduction in women. This association suggests the possibility that early BPA exposure may also affect reproductive capacity in women.

.....................

Bisphenol A (BPA) has received heightened attention in the last decade because of its ubiquitous presence. BPA is used in the production of polycarbonate plastics and epoxy resins, including the resins used to coat the inside of food and beverage cans, and for dental composites and sealants (Olea et al. 1996; Vandenberg et al. 2007; Ye et al. 2009). A growing body of evidence supports the chronic nature of human BPA exposure. BPA was detected in the urine of > 92% of Americans tested, with higher levels present in children and adolescents relative to adults (Calafat et al. 2008). BPA has also been detected in maternal (Padmanabhan et al. 2008) and fetal plasma, placenta, and amniotic fluid (Ikezuki et al. 2002; Schönfelder et al. 2002) and in breast milk (Sun et al. 2004). The levels of urinary BPA in premature infants in neonatal intensive care units are approximately 10 times higher than those in the general population (Calafat et al. 2009).

Perinatal Exposure to Environmentally Relevant Levels of Bisphenol A Decreases Fertility and Fecundity in CD-1 Mice

........................

Bisphenol A (BPA) is an organic compound with two phenol functional groups. It is used to make polycarbonate plastic and epoxy resins, along with other applications.

As it has been known to be estrogenic since the mid 1930s, concerns about the use of bisphenol A in consumer products were regularly reported in the news media in 2008, after several governments issued reports questioning its safety, prompting some retailers to remove products containing it from their shelves. A 2010 report from the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) raised further concerns regarding exposure of fetuses, infants and young children.[1] In September 2010, Canada became the first country to declare BPA as a toxic substance.[2][3] In the European Union and Canada, BPA use is banned in baby bottles.[4

Bisphenol A - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
oh yes....
Mr. Gates and Mr. Soros and Mr. Rockefeller et el.
such humanitarians.

such love.
 
Its hard to reason with someone who believes in conspiracy theories.

Because their main argument is "Wake up! Don't you see? This will happen to you! Don't believe the lies! Everyone is trying to kill you!"

It borders on lunacy....
 
In the 1950s, the Rockefellers reorganized the U.S. eugenics movement in their own family offices, with spinoff population-control and abortion groups. The Eugenics Society changed its name to the Society for the Study of Social Biology, its current name.

The Rockefeller Foundation had long financed the eugenics movement in England, apparently repaying Britain for the fact that British capital and an Englishman-partner had started old John D. Rockefeller out in his Oil Trust. In the 1960s, the Eugenics Society of England adopted what they called Crypto-eugenics, stating in their official reports that they would do eugenics through means and instruments not labeled as eugenics.

With support from the Rockefellers, the Eugenics Society (England) set up a sub-committee called the International Planned Parenthood Federation, which for 12 years had no other address than the Eugenics Society. This, then, is the private, international apparatus which has set the world up for a global holocaust, under the UN flag.
ROCKEFELLER AND MASS MURDER
 
Its hard to reason with someone who believes in conspiracy theories.

Because their main argument is "Wake up! Don't you see? This will happen to you! Don't believe the lies! Everyone is trying to kill you!"

It borders on lunacy....

keep talking.
it helps.