They just agreed that JD can never be a pastor again. But that he can repent and be restored to fellowship.
You haven't watched the full video I posted in post #21 or its analysis in post #29.
They just agreed that JD can never be a pastor again. But that he can repent and be restored to fellowship.
People need protection from Pumpkin Spice...not lousy preachers. They can learn about proper doctrines but they are putting pumpkin spice in everything lately
Yes, I have. And I have seen many videos where Christ deals with the fall of a pastor.You haven't watched the full video I posted in post #21 or its analysis in post #29.
And you don't see any parallels?You can't protect people from themselves; you can only educate them.
I could be mistaken but his arguments sounded like those of a cessationist to me.Chris Roseborough has stated many time his is not a cessationist. Lutherans are not necessarily cessationists.
The best way to deal with this issue is to:Man you really don't get it (or maybe you do get it). It's not about trying to get false teachers to repent; that ship has sailed. It's about protecting the flock who still care about truth.
Ok but he has explained his position directly,I could be mistaken but his arguments sounded like those of a cessationist to me.
If you have a video where he does this, I would like to see it. He comes off as a cessationist to me. He said cessationists and continuationists have come to a stalemate in the debate? Really? Cessationists don't have much to draw from, unless your ammo is the language of a specific confession or church doctrinal statement or just plain human reasoning instead of scripture.Ok but he has explained his position directly,
I am Lutheran. All Lutheran churches have crucifixes behind the alter. They are not idols. They arent worshiped or prayed to or touched. They are there as a reminder of the sacrifice of our Lord for our sin
I'll see if I can find the video where he states his beliefs concerning cessation.If you have a video where he does this, I would like to see it. He comes off as a cessationist to me. He said cessationists and continuationists have come to a stalemate in the debate? Really? Cessationists don't have much to draw from, unless your ammo is the language of a specific confession or church doctrinal statement or just plain human reasoning instead of scripture.
I just started watching one of his videos. He takes a clip from Francis Chan, unnecessarily interprets the wording in a negative light, and it felt like he was responding to a big strawman argument instead of what Francis Chan was already saying. His videos are too smarmy and smart-aleck for my liking. Why doesn't he just teach the Bible instead of taking unjustified digs at other people?
A crucifix is not an idol. Its art. Art that depicts the sacrifice of our Lord. If that is an idol all crosses, pictures, and sculptures are idols. I have never been in a single church in all my years that didnt have crosses, and depictions of the crucifixion. Most Christian homes have similar art. In fact I have never been in a home that doesnt have any art, come to think of it. So if you or your church have such art that make you the holder of a double standard.You defend a fellow Lutheran, big surprise. Chris Rosebrough uses double standards: one for people he doesn't like and another for his friends. This makes him a false and unreliable teacher.
If you need an idol to remind you of the Lord, you're already defeated. What will you do when you're not within sight of the idol to remind you?
I think Elijah was a little more than 'snarky' when taunting the priests of Baal about their false god. And perhaps king David was more than a bit 'snarky' when he called Goliath an "uncircumcised philistine".I'll see if I can find the video where he states his beliefs concerning cessation.
I have watched many of his videos. I agree he can be snarky unto off putting. His teaching is sound. I have seen by do a video on mr Chan (not sure if its the same video you watched) his assessment was correct.