Conspiracy Debunker Challenge!!
- Thread starter Deadtosin
- Start date
-
Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.
If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!
To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
Well, firstly, buildings are not sentient beings and don't think. Tell me why the building shown in the clip below started to collapse straight down but then fell toward the camera. In WTC building two the airplane hit the corner, therefore the building should have tilted in that direction (toward the weakest point).
5 story building collapse on construction worker - YouTube
When High tensile steel snaps, you will always have curled/curved edged at the snap site. All of these are even. Even the angle cut piece has no bend marks....because it was cut with high-temp explosives, leaving melted marks instead.
R
RachelBibleStudent
Guest
here is a link to a picture of a fractured steel beam for comparison... 51st Street crane collapse | Arup | A global firm of consulting engineers, designers, planners and project managers
R
RachelBibleStudent
Guest
so anything bright and yellow is now molten steel...it couldn't possibly be some remaining fires in the ruins of a building that had just been on fire...
R
RachelBibleStudent
Guest
well first of all a five story building has much less mass than the world trade center towers had...a five story building would have taken much less horizontal force to cause it to deviate from falling straight down...
and secondly...there actually -was- a slight tilt as the world trade center towers were falling...
the resistance of the lower part of the tower caused the upper part of the tower to 'tumble' slightly...but as i mentioned it was physically impossible for any of the forces involved to cause the path of the falling structure itself to deviate by more than a miniscule amount...
I'm glad you brought that up. The law of conservation of angular momentum decrees that the top of building two should have continued its path of swinging outward. It didn't, due to explosives.
End of story.
R
RachelBibleStudent
Guest
More angle-cut iron with melted edges.
this photo was taken during the cleanup operation...obviously the crews would have done a lot of cutting of the steel beams into manageable pieces that could be hauled away...
R
RachelBibleStudent
Guest
R
RachelBibleStudent
Guest
again you are wrong...the upper part of the building would not have swung outward...it would have simply continued to rotate around its center of mass...which is exactly what we see in some of the footage of the towers' collapse...
if you doubt this then try an experiment...drop a pencil while giving it a slight 'tilting' force...the pencil will still fall straight down but it will rotate as it falls...it will -not- become a horizontal projectile unless you give it a horizontal force...and as i already pointed out the upper part of the tower was far too massive for it to be moved horizontally by anything less than a tremendous force...
Last edited:
You're all over the place.
Regardless...
[video=youtube;EX7CPbIm1qs]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EX7CPbIm1qs[/video]
G
GaryA
Guest
Why they cut 45 degree angel?
I watch professor Niels Video, it said, in demolition they put explosive 45 degree to melt the beam, to make the debris focus in the center.
I don't see any reason cutting 45 degree angle for cleaning purpose.