Why is it that (some) cops always feel the need to shoot to kill? As opposed to shooting to merely injure? I mean, NINE troopers and cops ALL shot at him. And they killed him. Yes he had a gun, yes he was armed. From the article I read in our newspaper here, it seems Nathan had a long history of being a trouble maker. BUT that doesn't warrant him getting shot by 9 trigger happy cops. Nathan was on school grounds, and there were student and other people nearby on the bike path, and cars going past because the school is right by the highway, so I know the cops had to protect them all, but still..
NINE officers shot NINE guns with however many bullets in each gun? Rather overkill IMO...