A woman without her man is nothing. (Women are weak and need men to survive).
A woman, without her, man is nothing. (Men are weak and need women to survive).
How about that?!!!
A woman without her man is nothing. (Women are weak and need men to survive).
A woman, without her, man is nothing. (Men are weak and need women to survive).
How about that?!!!![]()
Miri, i just...i don't....
sigh.
![]()
i prefer the third option
A woman, without a man, is a babbling brook. A man, without a woman, is as lonely as a cloud.
A bit of English lit to add some culture to this thread. Or maybe I'm just babbling!
Yes there are other versus, but hardly anyone remembers the rest:
I wandered lonely as a Cloud
That floats on high o'er vales and Hills,
When all at once I saw a crowd,
A host, of golden Daffodils;
Beside the Lake, beneath the trees,
Fluttering and dancing in the breeze.
The other one the babbling brook was Lord Tennyson
http://catrineayrshirecouk.ipage.com/brook.htm
I think I would rather be a babbling brook than a lonely cloudat least that way
you can talk to yourself!
*smacks forehead*
Tennyson, of course! thank you.
perhaps if we read more literature, our grammar, spelling and punctuation might improve?
who knows? i may even begin using capital letters occasionally.![]()
On behalf of myself and others . . .
What the heck does that mean? On behalf of myself? That's just dumb!![]()
Wouldn't it be Leslie and myself? Not Leslie and me.Here's one:
The bank teller gave the money to Leslie and I. WRONG!!! It's not Leslie and I, it's Leslie and me.
Take Leslie out of the equation. I wouldn't say, the bank teller gave the money to I, that's wrong. I would say the bank teller gave the money to me. Having someone else as part of the equation does not alter the first person. The bank teller gave the money to Leslie and me.
I have a headache. Or is it, me have a headache?![]()