Does “Peace” Rejoice in D-Sport?

  • Christian Chat is a moderated online Christian community allowing Christians around the world to fellowship with each other in real time chat via webcam, voice, and text, with the Christian Chat app. You can also start or participate in a Bible-based discussion here in the Christian Chat Forums, where members can also share with each other their own videos, pictures, or favorite Christian music.

    If you are a Christian and need encouragement and fellowship, we're here for you! If you are not a Christian but interested in knowing more about Jesus our Lord, you're also welcome! Want to know what the Bible says, and how you can apply it to your life? Join us!

    To make new Christian friends now around the world, click here to join Christian Chat.
PAC-fit

PAC-fit

Active member
#1
Sep 20, 2018
134
45
28
#1
Does “Peace” really rejoice in Denominational sport?

sport n. Physical activity that is governed by a set of
rules or customs and often engaged in competitively.

“Do not be carried away by all kinds of strange teachings,
for it is good for the heart to be strengthened by grace”

“, , to give his people the knowledge of salvation
through the forgiveness of their sins,
because of the tender mercy of our God,
by which the rising sun will come to us from heaven
to shine on those living in darkness
and in the shadow of death,
to guide our feet into the path of peace.”
(Hebrews 13:9, Luke 1:77-79)

(For the benefit of all those trying to make their way through this issue)

Let’s say a denomination enjoys a full millennium of existence, my question is, does the reduction of Christ honoring participants which have moved on from the gathering of V-77 and proceeded into maturity, , are they truly strengthened in the kingdom of God’s “peace” (Rom 14:7)?
 
NayborBear

NayborBear

Banned Serpent Seed Heresy
#4
Dec 6, 2015
2,626
775
113
A deplorable! (so you know, what "state" I'm in!)
#4
PAC-fit said:
Does “Peace” really rejoice in Denominational sport?

sport n. Physical activity that is governed by a set of
rules or customs and often engaged in competitively.

“Do not be carried away by all kinds of strange teachings,
for it is good for the heart to be strengthened by grace”

“, , to give his people the knowledge of salvation
through the forgiveness of their sins,
because of the tender mercy of our God,
by which the rising sun will come to us from heaven
to shine on those living in darkness
and in the shadow of death,
to guide our feet into the path of peace.”
(Hebrews 13:9, Luke 1:77-79)

(For the benefit of all those trying to make their way through this issue)

Let’s say a denomination enjoys a full millennium of existence, my question is, does the reduction of Christ honoring participants which have moved on from the gathering of V-77 and proceeded into maturity, , are they truly strengthened in the kingdom of God’s “peace” (Rom 14:7)?
Click to expand...

I'll give it a "whirl!" But, doncha dare come back, a saying, "well?....that's not I was talking about!" Seeings how you have stated the "matter" so clearly...:rolleyes:

Ezekiel 34:5

And they were scattered, because there is no shepherd: and they became meat to all the beasts of the field, when they were scattered.

Jeremiah 23:2
Therefore thus saith the Lord God of Israel against the pastors that feed my people; Ye have scattered my flock, and driven them away, and have not visited them: behold, I will visit upon you the evil of your doings, saith the Lord.

Doesn't sound much like peace to me dude!
 
7

7seasrekeyed

Guest
#6
#6
well ok this didn't get very far, so let me ask

in what way, shape, or form could someone possibly proceed in a way that would not be considered arbitrary, while hoping for a substantiated acclaim by another denom, because that is what it would take to satisfy what you seem to understand about 'peace' while applying verses that seriously, have absolutely less than nothing to do with peace between human beings in a world that selfishly seeks to 'use' God for their own ends and purposes, understanding little of His holy character, but sadly, far too much of human personality?

egads man

consider what you wrote and do not bemoan the lack of participation

let me put it to you this way. I don't think people are thinking of Christ's peace that passes all understanding when they read what you wrote

and the indifferent little fellah on your post is the best I could find for my actual response of 'could you possibly be more vague or do you like to present intellectual prowess in a forum where people cannot agree on how salvation is achieved?'

like...whaz up?
 
PAC-fit

PAC-fit

Active member
#7
Sep 20, 2018
134
45
28
#7
7seasrekeyed said:
like...whaz up?
Click to expand...
Oh, low concern eh? Then so it is.

Still, last paragraph redefined:

All those who could be considered mature Christians within an assortment of mainline denominations; should they consider themselves worthy of the Spirit’s peace while occupying and approving of that which we are told is not permissible?

I appeal to you, brothers, in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ,
that all of you agree together, so that there may be no divisions
among you and that you may be united in mind and conviction.

(1 Corinthians 1:10)

Not exactly riddled with uncertainty, oh-yeah, low concern for some. I truly did expect more, even under an understanding of the spirit of understanding.
 
Dino246

Dino246

Senior Member
#8
Jun 30, 2015
25,587
13,857
113
#8
PAC-fit said:
Oh, low concern eh? Then so it is.

Still, last paragraph redefined:

All those who could be considered mature Christians within an assortment of mainline denominations; should they consider themselves worthy of the Spirit’s peace while occupying and approving of that which we are told is not permissible?

I appeal to you, brothers, in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ,
that all of you agree together, so that there may be no divisions
among you and that you may be united in mind and conviction.

(1 Corinthians 1:10)

Not exactly riddled with uncertainty, oh-yeah, low concern for some. I truly did expect more, even under an understanding of the spirit of understanding.
Click to expand...
Respectfully, you have succeeded whether most fail: in taking convoluted bafflegab to new lows. You seem to assume that everyone understands what you’re on about and that they just don’t care about the issues you’ve raised. I can assure you that I am fluent in English and yet I have trouble determining your subject, let alone your concern.
 
PAC-fit

PAC-fit

Active member
#9
Sep 20, 2018
134
45
28
#9
Y’know, that sounds very much like a deflection. Reader be advised, those who keep re-assessing my logic as flawed concerning the Lord’s will are most assuredly those to whom this subject is directed - protecting denominationalism. They have given me little very reason to think otherwise.

Ok then, Since you have such firm hold on the rational deciphering, the only question for you is, how does denominationalism fit in with the NT definition of “unity of the Spirit”?
 
Dino246

Dino246

Senior Member
#10
Jun 30, 2015
25,587
13,857
113
#10
PAC-fit said:
Y’know, that sounds very much like a deflection. Reader be advised, those who keep re-assessing my logic as flawed concerning the Lord’s will are most assuredly those to whom this subject is directed - protecting denominationalism. They have given me little very reason to think otherwise.

Ok then, Since you have such firm hold on the rational deciphering, the only question for you is, how does denominationalism fit in with the NT definition of “unity of the Spirit”?
Click to expand...
If this is a response to my post, then I will answer. It really does help to use the "Reply" button so everyone can see the post to which you're replying.

Mine was not a deflection at all. I was suggesting strongly that you find a way to convey your thoughts in a way that more people can understand. Otherwise, it's like you're speaking through static and only half of your thoughts are making it to the listener.

To answer your now-plain question, it doesn't. Denominationalism is a form of tribalism, which Paul wrote against in a few places. Denominationalism is what you get when people uphold their "tribe" as somehow inherently better and more worthy of God's favour than another "tribe", and are quick to decry not only the doctrines of other "tribes", but the people who hold to them as well.

However, that doesn't stop people who adhere to different denominations from enjoying fellowship with one another. They just may choose to avoid discussing the contentious issues. Most Christians that I have met in real life don't give a whit about denominations, but are content to serve and praise the Lord wherever they find themselves. Denominationalism seems to be more of an American thing.
 
PAC-fit

PAC-fit

Active member
#11
Sep 20, 2018
134
45
28
#11
Dino246 said:
However, that doesn't stop people who adhere to different denominations from enjoying fellowship with one another.
Click to expand...
Deflection, , just with another face.
Dino246 said:
Most Christians that I have met in real life don't give a whit about denominations, but are content to serve and praise the Lord wherever they find themselves. Denominationalism seems to be more of an American thing.
Click to expand...
My point being, doesn't this HS disrespect create spiritual dross and insensitivity?
 
Dino246

Dino246

Senior Member
#12
Jun 30, 2015
25,587
13,857
113
#12
PAC-fit said:
Deflection, , just with another face.
Click to expand...
You complain about nobody responding to your post, and when I do, you respond with this?

You may have some intelligent thoughts, but you don't seem to know how to communicate them clearly or respectfully.
 
7

7seasrekeyed

Guest
#13
#13
Dino246 said:
Respectfully, you have succeeded whether most fail: in taking convoluted bafflegab to new lows. You seem to assume that everyone understands what you’re on about and that they just don’t care about the issues you’ve raised. I can assure you that I am fluent in English and yet I have trouble determining your subject, let alone your concern.
Click to expand...

well that's what I told him in the same manner in which he posted

what you do, is use words in such a way they almost make sense..while sounding like you must be intelligent...and then spank people when they don't applaud you

no worries. he knows what I was saying

but he didn't like it cause he can't sound superior if someone actually points out what he was saying

I mean, has the wallpaper fallen off the walls somewhere and let something out?

so many people lately just make you cringe when you read their posts

like the misogynist in the other thread

sheesh
 
7

7seasrekeyed

Guest
#14
#14
PAC-fit said:
Oh, low concern eh? Then so it is.

Still, last paragraph redefined:

All those who could be considered mature Christians within an assortment of mainline denominations; should they consider themselves worthy of the Spirit’s peace while occupying and approving of that which we are told is not permissible?

I appeal to you, brothers, in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ,
that all of you agree together, so that there may be no divisions
among you and that you may be united in mind and conviction.

(1 Corinthians 1:10)

Not exactly riddled with uncertainty, oh-yeah, low concern for some. I truly did expect more, even under an understanding of the spirit of understanding.
Click to expand...

up up and away in my beautiful my beautiful baloooooooon.............

no hot air needed. already provided :rolleyes:
 
7

7seasrekeyed

Guest
#15
#15
PAC-fit said:
Y’know, that sounds very much like a deflection. Reader be advised, those who keep re-assessing my logic as flawed concerning the Lord’s will are most assuredly those to whom this subject is directed - protecting denominationalism. They have given me little very reason to think otherwise.

Ok then, Since you have such firm hold on the rational deciphering, the only question for you is, how does denominationalism fit in with the NT definition of “unity of the Spirit”?
Click to expand...

I'm thinking y'all got free of the same place o_O
 
7

7seasrekeyed

Guest
#16
#16
Dino246 said:
You complain about nobody responding to your post, and when I do, you respond with this?

You may have some intelligent thoughts, but you don't seem to know how to communicate them clearly or respectfully.
Click to expand...
forget it

the actual point of his op is to prove everyone wrong

which I said in my response, but since I also used convoluted code, it may have been missed

moving on...moving on

nothing to see here
 
PAC-fit

PAC-fit

Active member
#17
Sep 20, 2018
134
45
28
#17
Dino246 said:
You complain about nobody responding to your post, and when I do, you respond with this?
Click to expand...
i'm not complaining, I'm used to it, but okay then, I'll drop what refuses attention.
Dino246 said:
You may have some intelligent thoughts, but you don't seem to know how to communicate them clearly or respectfully.
Click to expand...
Well, you have no way of knowing as I am but a pup here. I'm one of those the Lord has had pity on as one of those survivors of the rebellious-60's. If it was to be countered or coveted, , I could be counted on and among the many things that suffered as a result, my academic competence was no exception.

So, the next time (Lord willing) you see that 'static' quality resurface, just pay him no mind. He's just a struggling soul from somewhere else.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.